한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제43권3호
  • /
  • Pages.253-263
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

상호작용적 독해 과정에서 생성된 질문과 답변의 분석을 통한 교사용 지도서와 초등예비교사의 내용지식 사이의 불일치 탐색 -'그림자와 거울' 단원을 중심으로

An Exploration of Discrepancies between Text and Content Knowledge of Pre-service Elementary Teachers through an Analysis of Questions and Answers Created in the Interactive Reading of a Teacher's Guide: Focusing on a 'Shadow and Mirror' Unit

  • Arla Go (Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Jiwon Lee (Korea National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2023.05.01
  • 심사 : 2023.05.16
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 초등학교 과학 빛의 직진과 반사 단원의 교사용 지도서 텍스트와 초등예비교사의 내용 지식 체계 사이의 불일치를 탐색하였다. 이를 위하여 교육대학교에 재학 중인 초등예비교사 279명이 교사용 지도서의 '그림자와 거울' 단원의 정해진 분량을 읽고 생성한 과학 지식에 대한 질문 455개와 답변 543개를 분석하였다. 질문은 과학 개념의 종류와 불일치 유형에 따라 분류하였고, 답변은 정확도를 분석하였다. 질문의 과학 개념을 분석한 결과, 초등예비교사들은 직진 개념에서는 그림자에 대해, 반사에서는 상에 대해, 그 외 개념에서는 광원에 대해 가장 궁금해하였다. 부정확한 답변이나 무응답률이 높아서 정답률이 낮은 질문은 반사에 의한 빛의 중첩, 실험도구의 원리, 렌즈에 의한 상 등으로 초등과학 교육과정에 일부포함되어 있거나 심화된 내용이었다. 불일치 유형에 따라 질문은 분류하면, 지식 충돌에 의한 질문보다 지식 결핍에 의한 질문 빈도가 89.5%로 높게 나타났으며, 지식 결핍 유형 중 현상의 원인에 대한 설명 요구 유형이 45.9%로 질문도 가장 많고, 답변의 정확도도 가장 낮았다. 이를 통해 초등예비교사의 지식 결핍에 의한 인지적 불일치가 해소될 수 있도록 초등교육과정에 현상 중심으로 제시되어 다루지 않는 개념이라도 교사가 알아야 할 개념은 교사용 지도서의 내용을 보강할 필요가 있다는 것을 확인하였다. 또한 교과서에 제시된 실험을 현장의 상황에 맞게 재구성할 때 정확한 실험이 이루어질 수 있도록 실험 설정의 이유와 실험 도구의 작동 원리에 대한 추가 설명을 지도서에 포함해야 할 필요가 있다는 것을 확인하였다. 지식 충돌에 의한 불일치는 현실에서 경험하는 것과 교과용 지도서에 제시된 내용이 충돌하여 생기는 사례가 많았다. 따라서 이를 해소하기 위해 우리 삶의 실제 맥락과 교과서 맥락에 대한 차이를 교사용 지도서에 포함하여 교사용 지도서 텍스트와 초등예비교사의 지식 사이의 불일치를 줄일 필요가 있다.

This study explored the discrepancy between the text of a teacher's guide about straight and reflective light and the content knowledge of pre-service elementary teachers. A total of 455 questions and 543 answers generated by 279 pre-service elementary teachers after reading a 'Shadow and Mirror' unit in the teacher's guide were analyzed. The questions were classified according to the types of concepts and discrepancies, and the answers were analyzed for accuracy. The results of analyzing the concepts of questions revealed that the pre-service elementary teachers were most curious about the shadow in the straight concept, the mirror image in the reflection concept, and the light source in other concepts. The questions with a low correct answer rate due to incorrect- or non-answers, such as those concerning the superposition principle of light by reflection, the principle of experimental tools, and images by lenses, were only partially or not included in the teacher's guide. When the questions were classified according to the type of discrepancy, the frequency of questions due to knowledge deficit was higher than that due to knowledge clash. This demonstrates that the concepts that teachers need to know must be supplemented with the contents of the teacher's guide. Discrepancies due to knowledge clashes are often caused by conflicts between what is experienced in everyday life and what is presented in textbooks. Therefore, it is necessary to reduce the discrepancy between the texts of the teacher's guide and the knowledge of pre-service elementary teachers by including the differences between the actual context of everyday life and the context of the textbook in the teacher's guide.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2020S1A5B5A16083941)

참고문헌

  1. Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge. Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85(4), 426-453.
  2. Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521-549.
  3. Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in science education, 44(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
  4. Dillon, J. T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum studies, 20(3), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027880200301
  5. Galili, I. (1996). Students' conceptual change in geometrical optics. International journal of science education, 18(7), 847-868. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180709
  6. Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000a). Learners' knowledge in optics: interpretation, structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900290000
  7. Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000b). The influence of an historically oriented course on students' content knowledge in optics evaluated by means of facets-schemes analysis. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1), S3-S15. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19518
  8. Galili, I., Bendall, S., & Goldberg, F. (1993). The effects of prior knowledge and instruction on understanding image formation. Journal of research in science teaching, 30(3), 271-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300305
  9. Go, A., & Kim, J. (2018). Development and Application of Tutorials on Image Formation through Convex Lens Based on an Object Image Consisted of Point Light Sources. School Science Journal, 12(2), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.12.2.201806.178
  10. Good, T. L., Slavings, R. L., Harel, K. H., & Emerson, H. (1987). Student passivity: A study of question asking in K-12 classrooms. Sociology of Education, 181-199.
  11. Graesser, A. C., & Olde, B. A. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 524.
  12. Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American educational research journal, 31(1), 104-137. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031001104
  13. Grossnickle, E. M. (2016). Disentangling curiosity: Dimensionality, definitions, and distinctions from interest in educational contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 23-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9294-y
  14. Han, K., & Noh, S. (2003). An Analysis on the Utilization of Teacher's Guides for Science in Elementary School. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 22(1), 51-64.
  15. Jang, M. (2009). Elementary Teachers' Understandings and Instructional Strategies on Students' Science Misconceptions. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(4), 425-439.
  16. Jeon, S., & Shin, A. (2021) Proposal of the Experiments Utilizing the Light Flux Screen for Optics Learning in the Elementary Science Education. New Phys.: Sae Mulli, 71(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.71.49
  17. Jeon, Y. (2006). Understanding American Teachers' Use of Teachers' Manuals: Two Case Studies. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 23(3), 5-24.
  18. Jeong, J., Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2016). A Study on Elementary School Teachers' Understanding of, Certainty in, and Familiarity with Wave Concepts in Textbook and Teacher's Guidebook. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(4), 389-405. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.4.389
  19. Ji, S., & Park, J. (2016). Elementary School Teachers' Difficulties to Suffer in the Science Classes from the Perspective of Content Knowledge and Teaching Method. Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2016.40.2.116
  20. Jirout, J., & Zimmerman, C. (2015). Development of science process skills in the early childhood years. Research in early childhood science education, 143-165.
  21. Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2016). Identifying pre-service physics teachers' misconceptions and conceptual difficulties about geometrical optics. European Journal of Physics, 37(4), 045705.
  22. Kim, D, & Hong, S. (2014). The Study on the Concept of Pre-service Elementary School Teachers Regarding Sedimentary Rock. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 25(2), 227-245.
  23. Kim, K., & Kim, J. (2011). Development and Application of Inquiry Modules for Instruction for the Concept of Straight propagation of Light. Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2011.35.2.173
  24. Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2014). Pre-service Science Teachers' Understanding of Students' Misconceptions in Physics and Perceptions on "Teacher as a Researcher" through the Research Experience. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(5), 449-457.
  25. Kwon, C, & Park, B. (2011). The Teacher's Recognition and Utilization for Subject of New Science Teacher's Guide in the Elementary School. The Journal of Korea elementary education, 21(2) 247-260.
  26. Kwon, G. (2014). An Analysis of Elementary Pre-service Teachers' Understanding of the Illustration of the Straw Reflection Image. Teacher Education Research, 53(4), 815-824. https://doi.org/10.15812/TER.53.4.201412.815
  27. Kwon, G., Bang, S., Lee, S., & Lee, G. (2006). Context-dependency of Students' Conceptions in Optics: Focused on Vision & Mirror Image. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(3), 406-414.
  28. Lee, G., & Kim, J. (2017). Comparison of Understandings on Light Propagation According to Shape of Light Source by Grade of Elementary School Students. School Science Journal, 11(2), 220-235. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.11.2.201706.220
  29. Lee, J. (2018). Collaborative Reading Comprehension of Science Textbook via Students' Knowledge Sharing in an Online Annotation System. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(5), 667-680. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.5.667
  30. Lee, J. (2015). Perspectives on traveling according to light source in students, pre- and in-service teachers. Master Thesis. Korea National University of Education, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
  31. Lee, J. (2021). Analysis of Elementary Pre-Service Teacher's Difficulties in Conceptual Understanding and Instructional Planning of Light Refraction. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 41(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2021.41.1.11
  32. Lee, K. (2013). An Analysis of the Association between Subject Matter Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teachers: The Case of Earth Science Teachers'Lesson on Atmospheric Pressure. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(6), 1219-1236. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2013.33.6.1219
  33. Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2012). Conceptual Changes on Electricity of Elementary Teachers through the Tutorial Emphasizing the Motion of Charges. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(1), 84-98. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2012.31.1.084
  34. Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2013). Development and Application of Peer Instruction Including Interactive Experiments Focused on Reflection of Light. Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 186-202. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2013.37.1.186
  35. Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2022). A Comparative Study on the Concept of Light Presented in Elementary School Science Curriculum and Textbooks in Korea, the US, China, and Japan. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 41(2), 283-294.
  36. Lee, J., Kim, J., Kim, K., Hwang, M., & Kim, J. (2013). Developing Sequential ConcepTests for In-service Science Teachers' Training based on Peer Instruction: Focus on "Principle of Pinhole Camera". Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2), 229-248. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2013.33.2.229
  37. Lee, S., Jhun, Y., Hong, J., Shin, Y., Choi, J., & Lee, I. (2007). Difficulties experienced by elementary school teachers in science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 97-107.
  38. Lee, W., Lee, S., & Lee, S. (2005). The technology teacher's recognition and utilization for subject of technology and home economics teacher's guide in the middle school. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 5(1), 56-70.
  39. Miller, A., Fisch, A., Dodge, J., Karimi, A. H., Bordes, A., & Weston, J. (2016). Key-value memory networks for directly reading documents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03126.
  40. Ministry of Education (2019). A Guide for Science Teachers in Grades 5-6 of Elementary School. Gyeonggi: National Book Compilation Committee.
  41. Miyake, N., & Norman, D. A. (1979). To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not known. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 18(3), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90200-7
  42. Otero, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2001). PREG: Elements of a model of question asking. Cognition and instruction, 19(2), 143-175. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1902_01
  43. Paik, S., & Jung, Y. (2009). A Case Study of Elementary School Teachers' Understanding of "Light and Image" and Change of Perception Related to Learning Contents. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(3), 245-262.
  44. Park, S., Park, J., & Back, N. (2014). An investigation on the conception of the Light and Shadow for the elementary students. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 25(3), 111-126.
  45. Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International journal of science education, 30(10), 1365-1387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187025
  46. Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and teacher Education, 5(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(89)90015-2
  47. Song, H., Lee, J., & Lee, G. (2012). Reflection on an elementary teacher's dilemma in teaching magnetic field. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(1), 95-103.
  48. Song, N., & Yoon, H. (2023). An Analysis of Elementary Pre-service Teachers' Pedagogical Reasoning about Students' Dissolution and Solution Conceptions. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 42(1), 64-81.
  49. Taslidere, E., & Eryilmaz, A. (2015). Assessment of Pre-Service Teachers' Misconceptions in Geometrical Optics via a Three-Tier Misconception/Ogretmen Adaylarinin Geometrik Optik Konusundaki Kavram Yanilgilarinin uc-Asamali Kavram Yanilgisi Testi ile Degerlendirilmesi. Bartin universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 4(1), 269.
  50. White, R., & Gunstone, R. (2014). Probing understanding. New York, NY: Routledge.
  51. Yoon, H., Lee, I., & Park, J. (2021). Pre-Service Elementary Teachers' Visual Modeling Process for Reflection of Light. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 41(1), 19-31.
  52. Zuzovsky, R., Tamir, P., & Chen, D. (1989). Specialized science teachers and general teachers and their impact on student outcomes. Teaching and teacher education, 5(3), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(89)90006-1