DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suicide Prevention Policy Guideline Model Considering Privacy Law in Korea

  • Do-Hyun Kwon (Department of Social Welfare, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • Received : 2022.09.22
  • Accepted : 2022.11.14
  • Published : 2023.04.30

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to review the Korean Constitution articles 14 and 20 of the "Law on suicide prevention" and investigate public perceptions of specific improvements to suicide prevention policies using results from the Korean 2018 National Survey on Suicide. Methods The questionnaire was designed to analyzing the act restricts sharing of patient information between hospitals, making it difficult to track suicide attempts. The questionnaire was also designed to suggest further medical and normative criteria for objective judgment of continuous follow-up utilizing suicide risk evaluations and proportional principle review that consider patients' and medical staff's basic rights. Results This study identified the result of the 1500 respondents, 79.1% believed that Korea should allow suicide prevention management to be implemented without requiring individual consent to protect suicide attempters. Conclusions According the results, I propose the following criteria for policy improvement: use of anonymized information and non-profit research for technical and ethical considerations, access to medical information only for therapeutic purposes, and use of surgical severity assessment criteria appropriate for Korea.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The Author received survey data support costs from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea in 2020 and having no conflicts to declare.

References

  1. www.oecd.org [homepage on the Internet]. Paris: OECD [cited 2019 Nov 21]. Available from: https://data.oecd.org/healthstat/sui-cide-rates.htm.
  2. www.abs.gov.au [homepage on the Internet]. Belconnen: Australian Bureau of Statistics [cited 2018 Sep 26]. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/3303.0Main+Features12017?OpenDocument=.
  3. www.abs.gov.au [homepage on the Internet]. Belconnen: Australian Bureau of Statistics [cited 2019 Sep 25]. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/causesdeath-australia/2018.
  4. Seoul National University College of Medicine. 2018 national survey on suicide. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2019.
  5. National Human Rights Commission of Korea. Annual Report 2018. Seoul: National Human Rights Commission of Korea;2019.
  6. National Human Rights Commission of Korea. Annual Report 2019. Seoul: National Human Rights Commission of Korea;2020.
  7. National Human Rights Commission of Korea. Annual Report 2020. Seoul: National Human Rights Commission of Korea;2021.
  8. National Human Rights Commission of Korea. Annual Report 2021. Seoul: National Human Rights Commission of Korea;2022.
  9. Yun YH, Kim KN, Sim JA, Yoo SH, Kim M, Kim YA, et al. Correction: Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e020519corr1.
  10. Jung JH. Introduction to the new constitution. Seoul: PakYoungSa; 2010.
  11. Constitutional Court of Korea. Dismissal decision; Court's Order of Attachment Electronic Device to Specific Crime Offenders and Imposition of Other Duties [2016 Hun-Ma453]. Seoul: Constitutional Court of Korea;2016.
  12. Constitutional Court of Korea. Decision of constitutional inconsistency; Case on Elec tronic Monitoring device of Prisoners When They Appear in Court [2016 Hun-Ma191, 2016 Hun-Ma330, 2017Hun-Ma171]. Seoul: Constitutional Court of Korea;2016.
  13. http://ncmh.go.kr [homepage on the Internet]. Seoul: National Center for Mental Health [cited 2016 May 30]. Available from: http://ncmh.go.kr/ncmh/board/boardView.do?no=8078&fno=106&bn=newsView&menu_cd=04_02_00_03&bno=&pageIndex=1&search_item=&search_content=.
  14. www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org [homepage on the Internet]. Arlington: TREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER [cited 2016 Sep 4]. Available from: https://www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org/evidence-and-research/learn-more-about/3632-schizophrenia-bipolardisorder-and-suicide.
  15. SSC.go.kr [homepage on the Internet]. Sejong: Social Security Committee [cited 2013 Jan 27]. Available from: https://www.ssc.go.kr/menuEn/Commi/Commi110100.do.
  16. Knaak S, Mantler E, Szeto A. Mental illness-related stigma in healthcare: barriers to access and care and evidence-based solutions. Healthc Manage Forum 2017;30:111-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470416679413
  17. UN.org [homepage on the Internet]. New York: United Nations [updated 1993; cited 1994 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/standard-rules-on-theequal-ization-of-pportunities-for-personswith-disabilities.html.