DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation by thickness of a linear accelerator target at 6-20 MeV electron beam in MCNP6

  • Dong-Hee Han (Department of Medical Health Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kyung-Hwan Jung (Department of Medical Health Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Jang-Oh Kim (Department of Radiological Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Da-Eun Kwon (Department of Medical Health Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Ki-Yoon Lee (Department of Radiological Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Chang-Ho Lee (Department of Emergency and Disaster Management, Inje University)
  • Received : 2022.11.02
  • Accepted : 2023.02.17
  • Published : 2023.06.25

Abstract

This study quantitatively evaluated the source term of a linear accelerator according to target thickness for a 6-20 MeV electron beam using MCNP6. The elements of the target were tungsten and copper, and a composite target and single target were simulated by setting different thickness parameters depending on energy. The accumulation of energy generated through interaction with the collided target was evaluated at 0.1-mm intervals, and F6 tally was used. The results indicated that less than 3% reference error was maintained according to the MCNP recommendations. At 6, 8, 10, 15, 18, and 20 MeV, the energy accumulation peaks identified for each target were 0.3 mm in tungsten, 1.3 mm in copper, 1.5 mm in copper, 0.5 mm in tungsten, 0.5 mm in tungsten, and 0.5 mm in tungsten. For 8 and 10 MeV in a single target consisting only of copper, the movement of electrons was confirmed at the end of the target, and the proportion of escaped electrons was 0.00011% and 0.00181%, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Daedeok Innopolis Foundation, Global Market Trend Report - Radiation Therapy Market, 2021, 05. 
  2. D.I. Thwaites, J.B. Tuohy, Back to the future: the history and development of the clinical linear accelerator, Phys. Med. Biol. 51 (2006) R343-R362.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/R20
  3. J.D. Graham, A.E. Nahum, M. Brada, A comparison of techniques for stereotactic radiotherapy by linear accelerator based on 3-dimensional dose distributions, Radiother. Oncol. 22 (1991) 29-35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8140(91)90066-P
  4. C.H. Lee, J.O. Kim, Y.J. Lee, C.H. Jeon, J.E. Lee, B.I. Min, A study on photon characteristics generated from target of electron linear accelerator for container security inspection using MCNP6 code, J. Korean Soc. Radiol. 14 (2020) 193-201. 
  5. C.H. Lee, J.O. Kim, Y.J. Lee, C.H. Jeon, J.E. Lee, B.I. Min, A study on activation characteristics generated by 9 MeV electron linear accelerator for container security inspection, J. Korean Soc. Radiol. 14 (2020) 563-575. 
  6. A. Mesbahi, A. Keshtkar, E. Mohammadi, M. Mohammadzadeh, Effect of wedge filter and field size on photoneutron dose equivalent for an 18 MV photon beam of a medical linear accelerator, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 68 (2010) 84-89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.08.008
  7. H.S. Kim, Y.H. Park, B.C. Koo, J.W. Kwon, J.S. Lee, H.S. Choi, Evaluation of the photoneutron field produced in a medical linear accelerator, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 123 (2007) 323-328.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncl162
  8. L. Montgomery, M. Evans, L. Liang, R. Maglieri, J. Kildea, The effect of the flattening filter on photoneutron production at 10 MV in the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator, Med. Phys. 45 (2018) 4711-4719.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13148
  9. Kjeld J. Olsen, Neutron contamination from medical electron accelerators (NCRP report No. 79), Med. Phys. 13 (1986) 968-969.  https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595800
  10. T. Goorley, M. James, T. Booth, F. Brown, J. Bull, L.J. Cox, J. Durkee, J. Elson, M. Fensin, R.A. Forster, Initial MCNP6 release overview, Nucl 180 (2012) 298-315. 
  11. Q. Gao, H. Zha, H. Chen, J. Shi, Design and optimization of the target in electron linear accelerator, Carbon 1 (2013), 0-05. 
  12. W.L. Huang, Q.F. Li, Y.Z. Lin, Calculation of photoneutrons produced in the targets of electron linear accelerators for radiography and radiotheraphy applications, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B NUCL. 229 (2005) 339-347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2004.12.117
  13. Varian Oncology Systems, MONTE CARLO MODELING - High Energy Accelerator Platform 26. 
  14. F.A.A. Ajaj, N.M. Ghassal, An MCNP-based model of a medical linear accelerator x-ray photon beam, Australas Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 26 (2003) 140-144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178784
  15. Z. Fardi, P. Taherparvar, A Monte Carlo investigation of the dose distribution for new I-125 Low Dose Rate brachytherapy source in water and in different media, Pol. J. Med. Phys. Eng. 25 (2019) 15-22. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2019-0003