DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investment and Firm Performance Variability

  • Hee-Jung Yeo (Dept. of Int'l Commerce, Keimyung University)
  • Received : 2022.09.25
  • Accepted : 2023.02.10
  • Published : 2023.02.28

Abstract

Purpose - The study analyzed 90 online firms worldwise and observed them for ten years to investigate their investments and firm performance variabilities. This study attemped to verify the existence of agency problems in online firms. Through this, the paper intends to expand the scope of research in the fields of investment and firm value both empirically and in theory. This study also attempted to supplement the insufficient logic of previous studies by analyzing the relationship between investment and profitability. Design/methodology - In this study, the investment is subdivided into over-, under-, and neutral investments, and an empirical analysis of the firm performance was conducted. As investment generally has long-term effects, the impact of a firm's investment on future firm performance and variabilities in firm performance was considered over the short-and medium-term period. Findings - It was found that there was a negative relationship between firms with an overinvestment and future firm performance. Underinvestment has no clear statistically significant results on firm performance. This implies that overinvestment causes more reduction in future firm performance than underinvestment. It was also found that underinvestment and overinvestment significantly increased the variability of firm performance. A positive significance was found between under- and over- investment with a variability of 3 years and overinvestment with a variability of 4 years in the future. A negative relationship was found between neutral investment propensity and future performance variabilities. Neutral investment has less effect on the future performance variability of a firm than a firm's overinvestment and underinvestment. For online firms, underinvestment and overinvestment have a greater effect on the firm's future performance variability than neutral investment. Originality/value - The agency theory predicts that information asymmetry and adverse selection problems exacerbate conflicts of interest among stakeholders, thus firm performance. The study contributed to accumulating research on online firms that are currently underexplored by analyzing the investment behavior of major firms in the online industry.

Keywords

References

  1. Biddle, G., and G. Hilary and R. Verdi (2009), "How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency?", Journal of accounting and economics, 48(2-3), 12-131.
  2. Choi, Jeong-Ho (2014), "Facility Investment, Investment Efficiency and Corporate Performance", Journal of Taxation and Accounting, 15(4), 47-74.
  3. Farooq, S., S. Ahmed and K. Saleem (2014), Impact of overinvestment & underinvestment on corporate performance: evidence from Singapore stock marke, Working Paper.
  4. Jensen, M. (1986), "Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers", American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
  5. Jensen, M. and W. Meckling (1976), "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  6. Kerstein, J. and S. Kim (1995), "The Incremental information content of captal expenditures", Accounting Review, 70(3), 513-526.
  7. Kim, Do-Yoon, Won-Seon Baek and Bo-Mi Lee (2017), "he Effect of Debt Ratio and Overinvestment Propensity on Profit Cost Coping", Accounting Studies, 42(3), 1-36.
  8. Lang, L., E. Ofek and R. Stulz (1996), "Leverage, investment and firm growth", Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00842-3
  9. McConnell, J. and C. Muscarella (1985), "Corporate capital expenditure decisions and market value of the firm", Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 399-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90006-6
  10. Miguel, A. and J. Pindado (2001), "Determinants of capital structure: New evidence from Spanish panel data", Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(1), 77-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(00)00020-1
  11. Miller, M. and F. Modigliani (1961), "Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares", Journal of Business, 34, 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1086/294442
  12. Mueller, D. (1969), "A Theory of conglomerate mergers", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 83(4), 642-659. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885454
  13. Myers, S. and N. Majluf (1984), "Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have", Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0
  14. Park, Jin-Hee and Chul-Gyu Hong (2021), "The Effects of Overinvestment, Neutral Investment, Underinvestment, and Industrial Characteristics on Business Performance", Journal of Accounting, 30(1), 1-45.
  15. Richardson, S. (2006), "Over-investment of free cash flows", Review of Accounting Studies, 11 (2-3), 159-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-9012-1
  16. Schrand, C. M. and S. L. C. Zechman (2012), "Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.09.001
  17. Shin, Min-Sik. Su-Eun Kim and Jae-Ik Lee (2014), "Empirical Verification of Underinvestment and Overinvestment Hypothesis", The Korean Society for Business Education, 29(5), 420-442.
  18. Stiglitz, J. and A. Weiss (1981), "Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information", American Economic Review, 71, 393-410.
  19. Titman, S., K. C. Wei and F. Xie (2004), "Capital investments and stock returns", Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39, 677-700. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000003173
  20. Vogt, S. C. (1994), "The cash flow/investment relationship: Evidence from US manufacturing firms", Financial Management, 23(2), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665735