DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measurement of Residual Stress Distribution in the Depth Direction of Annealed Materials of Lapped Bearing Steel Using Weighted Averaging Analysis Method

가중평균 해석법을 이용한 래핑된 베어링강 어닐링재료의 깊이방향에 대한 잔류응력분포 측정

  • Chang-Suk Han (Department of ICT Automotive Engineering, Hoseo University) ;
  • Chan-Woo Lee (Department of ICT Automotive Engineering, Hoseo University)
  • 한창석 (호서대학교 자동차ICT공학과) ;
  • 이찬우 (호서대학교 자동차ICT공학과)
  • Received : 2023.02.09
  • Accepted : 2023.04.20
  • Published : 2023.05.27

Abstract

This paper reports the results of an experimental examination using X-rays to test annealing materials for lapped bearing steel (STB2), to confirm the validity of the weighted averaging analysis method. The distribution behavior for the α𝜓-sin2𝜓 diagram and the presence or absence of differences in the peak method, half-value breadth method, and centroid method were investigated. When lapping the annealed bearing steel (STB2) material, a residual stress state with a non-directional steep gradient appeared in the surface layer, and it was found that the weighted averaging analysis method was effective. If there is a steep stress gradient, the sin2𝜓 diagram is curved and the diffraction intensity distribution curve becomes asymmetric, resulting in a difference between the peak method, half-value breadth method, and centroid method. This phenomenon was evident when the stress gradient was more than 2~3 kg/mm2/㎛. In this case, if the position of the diffraction line is determined using the centroid method and the weighted averaging analysis method is applied, the stress value on the surface and the stress gradient under the surface can be obtained more accurately. When the stress gradient becomes a problem, since the curvature of the sin2𝜓 diagram appears clearly in the region of sin2𝜓 > 0.5, it is necessary to increase the inclination angle 𝜓 as much as possible. In the case of a lapping layer, a more accurate value can be obtained by considering 𝜎3 in the weighted averaging analysis method. In an isotropic biaxial residual stress state, the presence or absence of 𝜎3 can be determined as the presence or absence of strain for sin2𝜓≈0.4.

Keywords

References

  1. C. S. Han and C. W. Lee, Korean J. Mater. Res., 33, 54 (2023). in press.
  2. S. K. Sen, T. C. Paul, S. Dutta, M. N. Hossain and M. N. H. Mia, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron., 31, 1768 (2020).
  3. D. Nath and R. Das, Phys. E, 144, 115376 (2022).
  4. T. Sasaki, S. Takahashi, Y. Kobayashi, Y. Morii and N. Metoki, Mater. Sci. Forum, 571/572, 255 (2008).
  5. Y. Kawabe and S. Kiriyama, J. Soc. Mater. Sci., Jpn., 27, 221 (1978).
  6. V. P. Nguyen, A. V. H. Nguyen, C. C. Le and T. N. Dang, Appl. Sci., 11, 9523 (2021).
  7. T. G. Kim, T. H. Kim, J. G. Kim, S. J. Kim and S. J. Im, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 12428 (2014).
  8. V. G. Getmanov, R. V. Sidorov and R. A. Dabagyan, Meas. Tech., 58, 1029 (2015).
  9. J. L. Yuan, K. F. Tang, Z. W. Wang, B. H. Lv and X. H. He, Adv. Mater. Res., 69/70, 287 (2009).
  10. I. G. McDonald, W. M. Moehlenkamp, D. Arola and J. Wang, Exp. Mech., 59, 111 (2019).
  11. V. Honkimaki, J. Appl. Cryst., 29, 625 (1996).
  12. A. N. Wang, C. P. Chuang, G. P. Yu and J. H. Huang, Surf. Coat. Technol., 262, 40 (2015).
  13. T. Sakakibara and Y. Sato, Powder Diffr., 20, 117 (2005).
  14. S. Iwanaga, H. Namikawa and S. Aoyama, J. Soc. Mater. Sci., Jpn., 21, 1106 (1972).
  15. S. Ejiri, H. Ohba and T. Sasaki, Mater. Sci. Forum, 1016, 423 (2021).
  16. W. Huang, D. Sun and S. W. Sloan, Int. J. Solids Struct., 44, 1423 (2007).