DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of histamine and antihistamine on the hard tick Haemaphysalis longicornis during blood sucking

  • Mohammad Saiful Islam (Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-safety Research Center, Jeonbuk National University, Specialized Campus) ;
  • Abul Fatah Shah Muhammad Talha (Laboratory of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-safety Research Center, Jeonbuk National University, Specialized Campus) ;
  • Myung-Jo You (Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-safety Research Center, Jeonbuk National University, Specialized Campus)
  • Received : 2022.06.15
  • Accepted : 2023.03.05
  • Published : 2023.05.31

Abstract

At the time of host attachment, ticks are very sensitive to histamine, but during rapid blood sucking they paradoxically require histamine. Using a rabbit model, we studied the effects of histamine and antihistamine during attachment and fast-feeding in different life stages of Haemaphysalis longicorns. We examined how they responded to histamine and antihistamine by analyzing the detachment rate, histology of feeding lesions, and post-feeding behavior. A significant difference (P<0.01) was found in the detachment rate between experimental and control treatments throughout the observation period. Ticks exhibited a higher detachment rate (30.1%) at 12 h after histamine application during attachment time and on antihistamine-treated skin (25.4%) at 96 h during fast-feeding. After feeding on histamine-treated rabbits, the fully engorged body weights of larvae and nymphs were 0.7±0.36 mg and 3.5±0.65 mg, respectively. An average increase in body weight of 0.6±0.05 mg and 3.2±0.30 mg was observed for larvae and nymphs compared to the respective control weights. Nymphs and adults engorged after antihistamine treatment had an average body weight of 1.3±0.54 mg and 54±0.81 mg, respectively. An average decrease in body weight was observed in antihistamine-treated H. longicornis compared with control nymphs (3.3±0.42 mg) and adults (174±1.78 mg). Skin biopsies were collected after treatment, and differential histopathological characteristics were found between the treatment and control groups. Tick-infested skin collected from rabbits in the antihistamine-treated group lacked erythrocytes in the feeding pool, indicating that antihistamine impaired tick fast-feeding stage.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Convergence Technologies Program for Educating Creative Global Leader, funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (grant number: 320005-4).

References

  1. Anderson JF, Magnarelli LA. Biology of ticks. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2008;22(2):195-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2007.12.006
  2. Kemp DH, Bourne A. Boophilus microplus: the effect of histamine on the attachment of cattle-tick larvae--studies in vivo and in vitro. Parasitology 1980;80:487-496. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000000950
  3. Francischetti IM, Sa-Nunes A, Mans BJ, Santos IM, Ribeiro JM. The role of saliva in tick feeding. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2009;14(6):2051-2088. https://doi.org/10.2741/3363
  4. Ribeiro JM, Alarcon-Chaidez F, Francischetti IM, Mans BJ, Mather TN, et al. An annotated catalog of salivary gland transcripts from Ixodes scapularis ticks. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2006;36(2):111-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.11.005
  5. Paine SH, Kemp DH, Allen JR. In vitro feeding of Dermacentor andersoni (Stiles): effects of histamine and other mediators. Parasitology 1983;86(3):419-428. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000050617
  6. Koudstaal D, Kemp DH, Kerr JD. Boophilus microplus: rejection of larvae from British breed cattle. Parasitology 1978; 76(3)379-386. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000048241
  7. Yeh MT, Bak JM, Hu R, Nicholson MC, Kelly C, et al. Determining the duration of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) attachment to tick-bite victims. J Med Entomol 1995;32(6):853-858. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/32.6.853
  8. Tirloni L, Islam MS, Kim TK, Diedrich JK, Yates JR 3rd, et al. Saliva from nymph and adult females of Haemaphysalis longicornis: a proteomic study. Parasit Vectors 2015;8:338. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0918-y
  9. Borkowski R, Karas AZ. Sedation and anesthesia of pet rabbits. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 1999;14(1):44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-2867(99)80026-7
  10. Bancroft JD, Marilyn G. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 1st ed. Elsevier Limited. London, UK. 2013, pp168-173.
  11. Fujisaki K, Kawazu S, Kamio T. The taxonomy of the bovine Theileria spp. Parasitol Today 1994;10(1):31-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4758(94)90355-7
  12. Paesen GC, Adams PL, Harlos K, Nuttall PA, Stuart DI. Tick histamine-binding proteins: isolation, cloning, and three-dimensional structure. Mol Cell 1999;3(5):661-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80359-7
  13. Mans BJ. Tick histamine-binding proteins and related lipocalins: potential as therapeutic agents. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2005;6(11):1131-1135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001205
  14. Dai J, Narasimhan S, Zhang L, Liu L, Wang P, et al. Tick histamine release factor is critical for Ixodes scapularis engorgement and transmission of the lyme disease agent. PLoS Pathog 2010;6(11):e1001205. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001205
  15. Schleger AV, Lincoln DT, McKenna RV, Kemp DH, Roberts JA. Boophilus microplus: cellular responses to larval attachment and their relationship to host resistance. Aust J Biol Sci 1976;29(5-6):499-512. https://doi.org/10.1071/bi9760499
  16. Kemp DH, Koudstaal D, Roberts JA, Kerr JD. Boophilus microplus: the effect of host resistance on larval attachments and growth. Parasitology 1976;73(1):123-136. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000051386
  17. Willadsen P, Williams PG, Roberts JA, Kerr JD. Responses of cattle to allergens from Boophilus microplus. Int J Parasitol 1978;8(2):89-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7519(78)90003-6
  18. Tatchell RJ, Moorhouse DE. The feeding processes of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). II. The sequence of host-tissue changes. Parasitology 1968;58(2):441-459. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000069468
  19. You MJ. Immunization of mice with recombinant P27/30 protein confers protection against hard tick Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) infestation. J Vet Sci 2005;6(1):47-51. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2005.6.1.47
  20. Williams H, Zoller H, Roepke RK, Zschiesche E, Heckeroth AR. Fluralaner activity against life stages of ticks using Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Ornithodoros moubata in vitro contact and feeding assays. Parasit Vectors 2015;8:90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0704-x
  21. Kumar V, Cotran RS, Robbins SL. Basic Pathology. 7th ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, USA. 2002.
  22. Nicholson AN, Pascoe PA, Turner C, Ganellin CR, Greengrass PM, et al. Sedation and histamine H1-receptor antagonism: studies in man with the enantiomers of chlorpheniramine and dimethindene. Br J Pharmacol 1991;104(1):270-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1991.tb12418.x
  23. Chen X, Ji ZL, Chen YZ. TTD: therapeutic target database. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30(1):412-415. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.1.412
  24. Logan TM, Linthicum KJ, Kondig JP, Bailey CL. Biology of Hyalomma impeltatum (Acari: Ixodidae) under laboratory conditions. J Med Entomol 1989;26(5):479-483. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/26.5.479