DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Possible power increase in a natural circulation Soluble-Boron-Free Small Modular Reactor using the Truly Optimized PWR lattice

  • Steven Wijaya (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) ;
  • Xuan Ha Nguyen (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) ;
  • Yonghee Kim (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST))
  • Received : 2022.04.27
  • Accepted : 2022.09.04
  • Published : 2023.01.25

Abstract

In this study, impacts of an enhanced-moderation Fuel Assembly (FA) named Truly Optimized PWR (TOP) lattice, which is modified based on the standard 17 × 17 PWR FA, are investigated in a natural circulation Soluble-Boron-Free (SBF) Small Modular Reactor (SMR). Two different TOP lattice designs are considered for the analysis; one is with 1.26 cm pin pitch and 0.38 cm fuel pellet radius, and the other is with 1.40 cm pin pitch and 0.41 cm fuel pellet radius. The NuScale core design is utilized as the base model and assumed to be successfully converted to an SBF core. The analysis is performed following the primary coolant circulation loop, and the reactor is modelled as a single channel for thermal-hydraulic analyses. It is assumed that the ratio of the core pressure drop to the total system pressure drop is around 0.3. The results showed that the reactor power could be increased by 2.5% and 9.8% utilizing 1.26/0.38 cm and 1.40/0.41 cm TOP designs, respectively, under the identical coolant inlet and outlet temperatures as the constraints.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIP) (NRF-2016R1A5A1013919).

References

  1. M.K. Rowinski, T.J. White, J. Zhao, Small and medium-sized reactors (SMR): a review of technology, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 44 (2015) 643-656.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.006
  2. EPRI, Elimination of Soluble Boron for a New PWR Design, Report Document EPRI-NP-6536, 1989. 
  3. M.S. Yahya, H. Yu, Y.H. Kim, Burnable absorber-integrated Guide Thimble (BigT) - I: design concepts and neutronic characterization on the fuel assembly benchmarks, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 53 (7) (2016) 1048-1060.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2015.1090937
  4. A.E. Abdelhameed, H.U. Rehman, Y. Kim, A physics study for passively-autonomous daily load-follow operation in soluble-boron-free SMR, in: International Congress on Advanced Nuclear Power Plants, Fukui & Tokyo, Japan, 2017. 
  5. A.E. Abdelhameed, X.H. Nguyen, Y. Kim, Feasibility of passive autonomous frequency control operation in a Soluble-Boron-Free small PWR, Ann. Nucl. Energy 116 (2018) 319-333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.02.036
  6. J. Liman, Small modular reactors: methodology of economic assessment focused on incremental construction and gradual shutdown option, Prog. Nucl. Energy 108 (2018) 253-259.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.06.002
  7. X.H. Nguyen, S. Jang, Y. Kim, A spectral optimization study of fuel assembly for soluble-boron-free SMR, in: Transaction of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, 2020. Jeju, South Korea. 
  8. X.H. Nguyen, S. Jang, Y. Kim, Impacts of an ATF cladding on neutronic performances of the soluble-boron-free ATOM core, Int. J. Energy Res. 44 (2020) 8193-8207.  https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5322
  9. N.E. Todreas, et al., NUCLEAR SYSTEMS II Elements of Thermal Hydraulic Design, Taylor and Francis, 2001. 
  10. P. Zhao, et al., Code development on steady-state thermal-hydraulic for small modular natural circulation lead-based fast reactor, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52 (12) (2020) 2789-2802.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.05.023
  11. NuScale Inc, Final Safety Analysis Report - Part 02 - Tier 02- Chapter 04-reactor, 2020. 
  12. S. Wijaya, X.H. Nguyen, Y. Kim, A Study on Natural Circulation Soluble-Boron-Free SMR with Long Cycle and High Burnup, Transaction of American Nuclear Society Virtual Annual Meeting, 2021. 
  13. S. Wijaya, X.H. Nguyen, Y. Kim, An Investigation of Three-Batch Fuel Management in a Natural Circulation Soluble Boron Free SMR, Transaction of American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, 2021. 
  14. X.H. Nguyen, S. Jang, Y. Kim, Truly-optimized PWR lattice for innovative soluble-boron-free small modular reactor, Sci. Rep. 11 (2021), 12891. 
  15. S. Wijaya, Y. Kim, Impact of truly optimized PWR lattice on maximum power of natural circulation reactor, in: Transaction of the Korean Nuclear Society Virtual Autumn Meeting, 2020. 
  16. K. Song, K. Jeon, Y. Jang, J. Park, Y. Koo, Progress in nuclear fuel technology in Korea, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 41 (4) (2009) 493-520.  https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.2009.41.4.493
  17. C.F. Colebrook, Turbulent flow in pipes with particular reference to the transition region between the smooth and rough pipe laws, J. Insitute Civil Eng. 11 (4) (1930) 133-156.  https://doi.org/10.1680/ijoti.1939.13150
  18. K. Rehme, Pressure drop correlations for fuel elements spacers, Nucl. Technol. 17 (1973) 15-23.  https://doi.org/10.13182/NT73-A31250
  19. D. Donne, et al., Thermohydraulic optimization of homogeneous and heterogenous advanced pressurized reactors, Nucl. Technol. 80 (1988) 107-132.  https://doi.org/10.13182/NT88-A35553
  20. E.S. Gaddis, V. Gnielinski, Pressure drop of tube bundles in cross flow, Int. Chem. Eng. 25 (1985) 1-15. 
  21. F.W. Dittus, L.M.K. Boelter, Heat Transfer in Automobile Radiators of the Tubular Type, vol. 2, University of California Publications in Engineering, 1930, pp. 443-461. 
  22. W.H. Jens, P.A. Lottes, Analysis of Heat Transfer, Burnout, Pressure Drop and Density Data for High Pressure Water, Argonne National Laboratory, 1951. ANL-4627. 
  23. NuScale Inc., Final safety analysis report - part 02 - tier 02- (chapter 05)-reactor coolant system and connecting system., 2020. 
  24. F. Patrick, Transient Thermal-Hydraulic Simulation of a Small Modular Reactor in Relap 5", Master's Theses, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, 2018. 
  25. J. Leppanen, et al., The Serpent Monte Carlo code: status, development and applications in 2013, Ann. Nucl. Energy 82 (2015) 142-150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.024
  26. M.B. Chadwick, et al., ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data, Nucl. Data Sheets 112 (2011) 2887-2996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002