DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigating Structural Stability and Constructability of Buildings Relative to the Lap Splice Position of Reinforcing Bars

  • Received : 2023.04.27
  • Accepted : 2023.05.22
  • Published : 2023.06.20

Abstract

The design principles and implementation of rebar lap splice in architectural structures are governed by building regulations. Nevertheless, the minimization of rebar-cutting waste (RCW) is often impeded by the mandatory requirements pertaining to the rebar lapping zone as prescribed in design codes. In real-world construction scenarios, compliance with these rules often falls short due to hurdles concerning productivity, quality, safety, time, and cost. This discrepancy between code stipulations and on-the-ground construction practices necessitates an academic exploration. The goal of this research was to delve into the effect of rebar lap splice placement on the robustness and constructability of building edifices. The study initially took on a review of the computation of rebar lapping length and the rules revolving around the lapping zone. Following this, a structural robustness and constructability examination was undertaken, focusing on adherence to the lap splice zone. The interpretations and deductions of the research led to the following insights: (1) the efficacy of rebar lap splice is not solely contingent on the moment, and (2) the implementation of rebar lap splice beyond the specified zone can match the structural integrity and robustness of those confined within the designated area. As a result, the constraints on the rebar lapping zone ought to be revisited and possibly relaxed. The conclusions drawn from this research are anticipated to reconcile the disconnect between building codes and practical construction conditions, furnishing invaluable academic substantiation to further the endeavor of achieving near-zero RCW.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grants funded by the Korean government(MOE)(No. 2022R1A2C2005276).

References

  1. Swami PS, Javheri SB, Mittapalli DL, Kore PN. Use of mechanical splices for reinforcing steel. International Journal of Innovations in Engineering Research and Technology. 2021 Mar;2016:NITET:1-6. 
  2. Nadoushani ZSM, Hammad AWA, Xiao J, Akbarnezhad A. Minimizing cutting wastes of reinforcing steel bars through optimizing lap splicing within reinforced concrete elements. Construction and Building Materials. 2018 Oct;185:600-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.023 
  3. Chen YH, Yang TK. Lapping pattern, stock length, and shop drawing of beam reinforcements of an RC building. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 2015 Jan;29(1):04014028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000303 
  4. ACI 318-14. Building code requirements for structural concrete. MI: American Concrete Institute; 2014. 519 p. 
  5. KDS 14 20 52. 2021 concrete structure - joint design criteria. Sejong (Korean): Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation; 2022. 18 p. 
  6. Mihai O. Structural use of concrete - part 1: code of practice for design and construction. United Kingdom: British Standard Institute; 1997. 150 p. 
  7. Japan Society of Civil Engineers. Standard specifications for concrete structures - 2007 "Design" in JSCE Guidelines for Concrete. No. 15. Tokyo (Japan): Japan Society of Civil Engineers; 2010. 469 p. 
  8. Kwon KH, Kim DY, Kim SK. Cutting waste minimization of rebar for sustainable structural work: A systematic literature review. Sustainability. 2021 May;13(11):5929. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115929 
  9. Tabsh SW. Comparison between reinforced concrete designs based on the ACI 318 and BS 8110 codes. Structural Engineering and Mechanics. 2013 Nov;48(4):467-77. https://doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2013.48.4.467 
  10. American Concrete Institute. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-14) and commentary on building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318R-14). MI; American Concrete Institute; 2014. 519 p. 
  11. Almeida JP, Prodan O, Tarquini D, Beyer K. Influence of lap splices on the deformation capacity of RC walls. I: database assembly, recent experimental data, and findings for model development. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 2017 Dec;143(12):04017156. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001853 
  12. KDS 14 20 50. 2021 Concrete Structure - Joint Design Criteria. Sejong (Korean): Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation; 2022. 15 p. 
  13. Simitses GJ, Hodges DH. Fundamentals of Structural Stability. 1st edition. MA: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005. 480 p. 
  14. Gilbert RI, Kilpatrick AE. The strength and ductility of lapped splices of reinforcing bars in tension. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering. 2015 Nov;16(1):35-46.  https://doi.org/10.7158/S13-033.2015.16.1
  15. Gillani ASM, Lee SG, Lee SH, Lee H, Hong KJ. Local behavior of lap-spliced deformed rebars in reinforced concrete beams. Materials. 2021 Nov;14(23):7186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237186 
  16. Pul S, Senturk M. An experimental study on effects of lap-spliced joint on structural behavior of RC columns. Fourth Conference on Smart Monitoring, Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures; 2017 Sep 13-15; Zurich, Switzerland. Zurich (Switzerland): Empa & ITU; 2017. P. 1-7 
  17. El-Azab A, Mohamed HM. Effect of tension lap splice on the behavior of high strength concrete (HSC) beams. HBRC Journal. 2014 Jan;10(3):287-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.01.002 
  18. Al Haddad MS, Elsanadedy HM, Iqbal RA. Seismic evaluation of the ACI code provisions for lap splicing of longitudinal bars in R/C rectangular bridge columns. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2014 Sep;39:2495-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-013-0815-7 
  19. Lowes LN, Lehman DE, Birely AC, Kuchma DA, Marley KP, Hart CR. Earthquake response of slender planar concrete walls with modern detailing. Engineering Structures. 2012 Oct;43:31-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.040 
  20. Hardisty JM, Villalobos E, Richter BP, Pujol S. Lap splices in unconfined boundary elements. 318Reference. 2015 Jan;1:51-8. 
  21. Menegon SJ, Wilson JL, Lam NTK, Gad EF. Experimental testing of reinforced concrete walls in regions of lower seismicity. BNZSEE. 2017 Dec;50(4):494-503. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.50.4.494-503 
  22. Birely A. Seismic performance of slender reinforced structural concrete walls [dissertation]. [Washington DC (WA)]: University of Washington; 2012. 923 p. 
  23. Sritharan S, Beyer K, Henry RS, Chai YH, Kowalsky M, Bull D. Understanding poor seismic performance of concrete walls and design implications. Earthquake Spectra. 2014 Feb;30:307-34. https://doi.org/10.1193/021713EQS036M 
  24. Farooq U, Nakamura H, Miura T. Evaluation of failure mechanism in lap splices and role of stirrup confinement using 3D RBSM. Engineering Structures. 2022 Feb;252:113570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113570 
  25. Diab MAM. Lap splices in reinforced concrete beams subjected to bending [master's thesis]. [Alexandria (Egypt)]: Alexandria University Faculty of Engineering; 2008. 163 p. 
  26. Clausen J, Hansson SO, Nilsson F. Generalizing the safety factor approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2006 Aug;91(8):964-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.09.002 
  27. Nawaz W, Yehia S, Elchalakani M. Lap splices in confined self-compacting lightweight concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2020 Dec;263:120619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120619 
  28. Griffith A, Sidwell AC. Development of constructability concepts, principles, and practices. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 1997;4(4):295-310. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021054 
  29. Lee D, Son S, Kim D, Kim S. Special-length-priority algorithm to minimize reinforcing bar-cutting waste for sustainable construction. Sustainability. 2020 Jul;12(15):5950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155950