과제정보
이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2020S1A3A2A01095782).
참고문헌
- Adey, P. (2004). The professional development of teacher' practice and theory. Kluwer Academic.
- Akerson, V. L., Carter, I., Pongsanon, K., & Nargund-Joshi, V. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of science in elementary classrooms: Research-based strategies for practical implementation. Science & Education, 28, 391-411.
- Allchin, D., Andersen, H. M., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98(3), 461-486.
- Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world's best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Company.
- Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94, 577-616. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20390
- Bouwma-Gearhart, J. (2012). Science faculty improving teaching practice: Identifying needs and finding meaningful professional development. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 180-188.
- Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26(6), 673-782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.10.002
- Davis, K. S. (2003). "Change is hard": What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10037
- Flora, D.B., & Panter, A.T. (1999). Technical report: Analysis of the psychometric structure of the LSC surveys. L.L. Thurstone Psychometric Lab.
- Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfelt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055-2100. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100905
- Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340
- Ha, H. (2014). Critical discussion on practice turn in social theory: Focusing on Anthony Giddens and Pierre Bourdieu. Korean Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 205-233. https://doi.org/10.21562/kjs.2014.02.48.1.205
- Hoban, G. F. (2005). Developing a multi-linked conceptual framework for teacher education design. In G. F. Hoban (Ed.), The missing links in teacher education design: Developing a multi-linked conceptual framework. Springer.
- Jeong, J-S., Park, J., Park, J., Kim, Y., & Park, Y-S. (2014). Developing and applying in-service program for spreading the practical on-site cooperation model(POCoM). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(3), 261-272. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.3.0261
- Joram, E., & Gabriele, A. J. (1998). Preservice teachers' prior beliefs: Transforming obstacles into opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00035-8
- Kang, J., & Jhun, Y. (2019). A comparison of viewpoints on the good lesson between elementary school pre-service teachers and experienced teachers. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 38(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2019.38.1.31
- Kang, N. -H., & Park, Y. (2010). Identification of instructional components to increase students' interest and creativity in American science classrooms. Journal of Science Education (Kyougpook Natioal University), 34(2), 421-431. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2010.34.2.421
- Kellner, E., Gullberg, A., Attorps, I., Thoren, I., & Tarneberg, R. (2011). Prospective teachers' initial concpetions about pupils' difficulties in science and mathematics: A potential resource in teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 843-866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9232-5
- Kemp, E. K., Tzou, C. T., Reiser, B. J., & Spillane, J. P. (2002). Managing dilemmas in inquiry science teaching. In P. Bell, R. Stevens, & T. Satwicz (Eds.), Keeping learning complex: The Proceedings of the fifth international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS) (pp. 206-213). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Kennedy, M. M. (2010). Against boldness. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 16-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347876
- KICE (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation). (2006). Class evaluation manual: Science class evaluation standard. Research Report, 2006-24-7.
- Kim S., & Park, J. (2017). Application of the KTOP(Korean Teaching Observation Protocol) for observing and improving science teaching in teaching practicum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(6), 961-970.
- Kloser, M. (2014). Identifying a core set of science teaching practices: A delphi expert panel approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1185-1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21171
- Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4-17.
- Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002
- Kwak, Y. -S. (2003). Case study of science classroom analysis. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(5), 484-493.
- Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55(2), 178-195. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.55.2.56142234616x4352
- Lampert, M. (1995). Managing the tensions in connecting students' inquiry with learning mathematics in school. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West & M. S. Wiske (Eds.), Software goes to school: Teaching for understanding with new technologies (pp. 213-232). Oxford University Press.
- Lee, B. (2016). Secondary science teachers' concepts of good science teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.1.0103
- Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/1177052
- Mostafa, T., Echazarra, A., & Guillou, H. (2018). The science of teaching science: An exploration of science teaching practices in PISA 2015, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 188, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/f5bd9e57-en
- NRC (1996). National science education standards. National Academy Press.
- Park, J., Kim, Y., Heong, J. -S., Park, Y. -S., Park, J. (2017). Expansive application of the POCoM(Practical On-site Cooperation Model) for practical improvement of science teaching. Journal of Science Education (Kyungpook National University), 41(3), 365-381.
- Park, J., Kim, Y., Park, J., Jeong, J-S., & Park, Y-S. (2016). Korean science teachers' perceptions and actual usage of educational theories and teaching strategies in their teaching. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.411
- Park, J., Kim, Y., Park, Y-S., Park, J., & Jeong, J-S. (2015). Development and application of the practical on-site cooperation model(POCoM) for improving science teaching in secondary schools. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(1), 45-63.
- Park, J., Park, Y-S., Kim, Y., Park, J., & Jeong, J-S. (2014). The development of the Korean teaching observation protocol(KTOP) for improving science teaching and learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(2), 259-275. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/14.13.259
- Piburn, M., & Sawada, D. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol(RTOP) reference manual, ACEPT Technical Report No. IN00-3. Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.
- Roth, K., & Garnier, H. (2007). What science teaching looks like: An international perspective. Educational Leadership, 64(4), 16-23.
- Rouse, J. (2007). Social practices and normativity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393106296542
- Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School Science and Mathematics, 102(6), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17883.x
- Singer, J., Lotter, C., Feller, R., & Gates, H. (2011). Exploring a model of situated professional development: Impact on classroom practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(3), 203-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9229-0
- Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963-980. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-0
- Turner, S. (1994). The social theory of practices. University of Chicago Press.
- Wainwright, C. L., Flick, L., & Morrell, P. (2003). The development of instruments for assessment for instructional practices in standards-based teaching. The Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations, 6, 21-46.
- Weinburgh, M. (2003). Confronting and changing middle school teachers' perceptions of scientific methodology. School Science and Mathematics, 103(5), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18203.x
- Wilson, S. M. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340(6130), 310-313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230725
- Windschitl, M., Thomson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878-903. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21027
- Yoon, H.-G. (2008). Elementary teachers' dilemmas of teaching science practical work. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27(2), 102-116.
- Zion, M., Cohen, S., & Amir, R. (2007). The spectrum of dynamic inquiry teaching practices. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 423-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9034-5
- Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121-169.