DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of treatment outcomes based on socioeconomic factors of patients visiting the emergency room

응급실 내원 환자의 사회경제적 요인에 따른 치료 결과 분석

  • Received : 2023.03.01
  • Accepted : 2023.04.27
  • Published : 2023.04.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the treatment outcomes according to the socioeconomic factor of patients who visited the emergency room. Methods: This study conducted frequency analysis, percentage analysis, and Fisher's exact test analysis method, using the R 4.1.2 program based on the 2019 data from the Korea Health Panel. Results: Among the treatment results of 1,648 patients, 392 patients were hospitalized or transferred to other hospitals, 845 were discharged after treatment, 224 were discharged, and 7 died. The Fisher's exact test of treatment outcomes and socioeconomic factors was not statistically significant for status of the worker and employment relationship, but was significant for the housing, household, economic activity, and insurance types, and marital status and education. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that it is necessary to conduct follow up studies on socioeconomic factors to provide basic data that can contribute to fairness and equity in the health care field.

Keywords

References

  1. Gim DY. A study on the effects of socioeconomic status on health level and medical service use. Pukyong National University 2015;16(4):329-69.
  2. Kim HS, Kim HJ. Searching methods about emergency medical informations according to the people who admitted in emergency department. Crisisonomy 2013;9(8):87-93.
  3. Grand J, Vizard P. The National Health service: Crisis, Change, or Continuity?. In Glennerster, Howard and Hills, John (eds.), The State of Welfare: The economics of social spending. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. 75-121.
  4. Lane H, Sarkies M, Martin J, Haines T. Equity in healthcare resource allocation decision making: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2017;175(1):11-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.012
  5. Kolasa K, Lewandowski T. Does it matter whose opinion we seek regarding theallocation of healthcare resources? a case study. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15(1):564-73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1210-8
  6. Baltussen R, Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2006;4(1):14-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-4-14
  7. Lee MS. Structures of health inequalities of korean elderly : analysis of korean longitudinal study of ageing. Korean Association of Health and Medical Sociology 2009;25(0):5-32.
  8. World health organization. The economics of the social determinants of health and health in-equalities: a resource book. 2013.
  9. Shin YH, Jung SW, Kim BK. Relationship between frequency of emergency room visits and socioeconomic factors. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2022;26(1):129-38. https://doi.org/10.14408/KJEMS.2022.26.1.129
  10. Jeong BG. The effects of socioeconomic position and social relationship on the depresson. Korean J Health Educ Promot 2016;33(5):93-105. https://doi.org/10.14367/kjhep.2016.33.5.93
  11. Veenstra G, Jeong BG. The intergenerational production of health in South Korea. Health Sociol Rev 2015;25(3):288-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1198983
  12. Jeong BG, Veenstra G. The intergenerational production of depression in South Korea: Results from a cross-sectional study. Int J Equity Health 2017;16(1):13-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0513-7
  13. Assari S. Social determinants of depression: the intersections of race, gender, and socioeconomic status. Brain Sci 2017;7(12):156-69. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7120156
  14. Hoebel J, Maske U, Zeeb H, Lampert T. Social inequalities and depressive symptoms in adults: the role of objective and subjective socioeconomic status. PloS one 2017;12(1):e0169764 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169764
  15. Park EO. Socioeconomic vulnerability and depressive symptoms among korean adults: based on national representative survey. Health and Social Science 2020;0(55):205-19. https://doi.org/10.37243/kahms.2020.55.205
  16. Jeon YS, Kim CY. The equity of health care utilization depending on injury patients'socio-economic status. The Korean Journal of Health Economics and Policy 2012;18(2):21-45.
  17. National emergency medical center. 2005 National emergency department information system statistical yearbook. 2006.
  18. Moon SY, Kim SJ. The degree of satisfaction with nursing care of pediatric patients visiting emergency center. Child Health Nurs Res 2000;6(1):5-17.
  19. Carlson LC, Zachrison KS, Yun BJ, Ciccolo G, White BA, Camargo CA et al. The Association of Demographic, Socioeconomic, and Geographic Factors with Potentially Preventable Emergency Department Utilization. West J Emerg Med 2021;22(6):1283-90. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.5.50233
  20. Carlson LC, Kim JY, Samuels-kalow ME, Yun BJ, Terry DF, Weilburg JB et al. Comparing neighborhood-based indices of socioeconomic risk factors and potentially preventable emergency department utilization. Am J Emerg Med 2021;44:213-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.03.035
  21. National emergency medical center. 2021 National emergency department information system statistical yearbook. 2022.
  22. Ramos QR, Kim KH, Park JH, Shin SD, Song KJ, Hong KJ. Socioeconomic disparities in Rapid ambulance response for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a public emergency medical service system: A nationwide observational study. Resuscitation 2021;158:143-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.11.029
  23. Kwon YD, Yoon SS, Chang HJ. Impact of an early hospital arrival on treatment outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients. J Prev Med Public Health 2007;40(2):130-6. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.2.130
  24. Hsia RY, Huang D, Mann NC, Colwell C, Mercer MP, Dai M et al. A US national study of the association between income and ambulance response time in cardiac arrest. JAMA Netw Open 2018;1(7):e185202. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5202
  25. Fuda KK, Immekus R. Frequent users of Massachusetts emergency departments: a statewide analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.001
  26. Korea institute for health and social affairs, National health insurance. Korea health panel. Available at: http://www.khp.re.kr/
  27. Kim SJ, Kim BR, Park SJ. Preventable hospitalizations and emergency room visits: focus on medical aid beneficiaries with chronic conditions. Health and Social Welfare Review 2015;35(2):405-28. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2015.35.2.405
  28. Ballard DW, Price M, Fung V, Brand R, Reed ME, Fireman B et al. Validation of an algorithm for categorizing the severity of hospital emergency department visits. Med Care 2010;48(1):58-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181bd49ad
  29. National emergency medical center. 2021 Emergency room visit status report: severe emergency disease. 2022.
  30. Moon JY, Choi YJ, Seo NK. Acomparative study on factors related to the health expenditure of different household types of the elderly with chronic disease. Health and Social Science 2014;0(35):285-307.
  31. Park GR, Tchoe BH. Self-rated health and life-satisfaction among housing vulnerable groups in korea. Health and Social Welfare Review 2019;39(2):500-18. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2019.39.2.500
  32. Carlson LC, Zachrison KS, Yun BJ, Ciccolo G, White BA, Camargo CA et al. The association of demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors with potentially preventable emergency department utilization. West J Emerg Med 2021;22(6):1283-90. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.5.50233