한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육 (The Mathematical Education)

  • 제62권2호
  • /
  • Pages.269-287
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1225-1380(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9633(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

독일 고등학교 수학에서 행렬 교수·학습 내용 분석

Analysis of teaching and learning contents of matrix in German high school mathematics

  • 투고 : 2023.05.01
  • 심사 : 2023.05.22
  • 발행 : 2023.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

행렬이론은 수학, 자연과학, 공학뿐 아니라 사회과학과 인공지능 분야에까지 다양하게 활용되고 있다. 중·고등학교 수학에서 행렬은 학습 부담 경감을 위해 2009 개정 수학과 교육과정에서 삭제되었다가 인공지능 시대를 맞이하여 2022 개정 교육과정에 재편성될 예정이다. 이에 다른 나라에서 다루고 있는 행렬 내용을 분석함으로써 행렬 지도를 위한 의미 있는 방향을 제시하고 교과서 구성을 위한 시사점을 도출할 필요성이 있다. 이를 위해 본고에서는 독일 수학과 표준교육과정과 독일 헤센주의 수학과 교육과정을 분석하고, 독일 수학 교과서의 행렬 단원의 내용 요소 및 전개 방식의 특징을 분석하였다. 분석 결과 독일 교과서는 선형연립방정식의 풀이를 위한 행렬, 일차변환을 설명하기 위한 행렬, 전환과정을 설명하기 위한 행렬로 나누어 행렬 단원을 다루고 있으며 모두 역행렬을 다루고 있고 수학적 추론 및 수학적 모델링에 중점을 두고 행렬을 학습하는 것으로 나타났다. 분석 결과로부터 학교 수학에 행렬을 재편성할 경우 깊이 있는 개념적 이해와 수학적 추론 및 수학적 모델링에 중점을 두어 교육내용을 구성할 것을 제안하는 바이다.

Matrix theory is widely used not only in mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering, but also in social sciences and artificial intelligence. In the 2009 revised mathematics curriculum, matrices were removed from high school math education to reduce the burden on students, but in anticipation of the age of artificial intelligence, they will be reintegrated into the 2022 revised education curriculum. Therefore, there is a need to analyze the matrix content covered in other countries to suggest a meaningful direction for matrix education and to derive implications for textbook composition. In this study, we analyzed the German mathematics curriculum and standard education curriculum, as well as the matrix units in the German Hesse state mathematics curriculum and textbook, and identified the characteristics of their content elements and development methods. As a result of our analysis, it was found that the German textbooks cover matrices in three categories: matrices for solving linear equations, matrices for explaining linear transformations, and matrices for explaining transition processes. It was also found that the emphasis was on mathematical reasoning and modeling when learning matrices. Based on these findings, we suggest that if matrices are to be reintegrated into school mathematics, the curriculum should focus on deep conceptual understanding, mathematical reasoning, and mathematical modeling in textbook composition.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andreas C. M. & Sarah G. (2016). Introduction to Machine Learning with Python. O'Reilly Media.
  2. Baum, M. et al. (2012). Lambacher Schweizer mathematik analytische geometrie und lineare algebra GK/LK - Bundesausgabe ab 2012. Klett Ernst.
  3. Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer
  4. Choi, E. & Kwon, O. N. (2020). Comparison of trigonometry in mathematics textbooks in Korea, Australia, and Finland. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(3), 393-419. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2020.34.3.393
  5. Choi, H. M. (2010). A comparative analysis of matrix unit in national textbooks by country [Unpublished Master's thesis, Korea University].
  6. Chong, Y. O. (2004). Reflections on mathematics curriculum of germany -Focusing on Nordrhein-Westfalen-, School Mathematics, 6(2), 181-211.
  7. Edge, J., & Wharton, S.(1998). Autonomy and development: Living in the materials world. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 295-310). Cambridge University Press.
  8. Foxman, D. (1999). Mathematics textbooks across the world: Some evidence from the third iInternational mathematics and science study (TIMSS). NFER
  9. Goodfellow, I.., Bengio, Y.., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.
  10. Hessisches Kultusministerium (2016). Kerncurriculum gymnasiale Oberstufe Mathematik. Retrieved from https://kultusministerium.hessen.de/sites/kultusministerium.hessen.de/files/2021-07/kcgo-m.pdf
  11. Heo, N. G. (2020). Analysis of secondary mathematics knowledge for AI learning through the AI related R&E program. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(16), 673-689. http://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.16.673
  12. Huh, E. S. (2005). Study on the teaching of the concepts of linear algebra in the high school mathematics : Focused on the mathematical connections [Unpublished Master's thesis, Graduate School of Seoul National University].
  13. Huh, N., Ahn, E. K., & Ko, H. K. (2011). Comparative analysis of the contents of functions in the middle school mathematics textbooks in Korea and Germany. School Mathematics, 13(2), 323-343.
  14. Kang, H. Y. (2022). A study on digital and AI literacy education to prepare for Future. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 23(6), 1067-1075. http://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2022.23.6.1067
  15. Kim, M. (2011). How are textbooks made? Ewha Womans University Press.
  16. Kim, M. H, &. Kim, G. Y. (2013). The analysis of mathematical tasks in the high school mathematics. School Mathematics, 15(1), 37-59.
  17. Kim, M. J. (2011). A study on Teaching of Matrices in the High School Math [Master's thesis, Graduate School of Education of Pusan National University].
  18. Kim, S. K., & Lee, M. Y. (2021). Analysis of the German mathematics standard curriculum: Focusing on the comparison with the 2015 revised mathematics curriculum of Korea. School Mathematics, 23(1), 147-168. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2021.03.23.1.147
  19. Kim, Y. K. (2002). A study of practical life problems and solutions using the matrix [Unpublished Master's thesis, Suncheon National University].
  20. KMK (2012). Bildungsstandards im Fach Mathematik fur die Allgemeine Hochschulreife. Retrieved from https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2012/2012_10_18-Bildungsstandards-Mathe-Abi.pdf (검색일: 2022.10.25.)
  21. Ko, H. K. (2020). A study on development of school mathematics contents for artificial intelligence (AI) capability. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 23(2), 223-237. http://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2020.23.2.003
  22. Kuem, J. H., Ko, H. K., Kwon, O. N., Kim, M. H., Kim, Y. W., Nam, H. S., Song, S. H., Lee, K. W., Lee, S. H., Lee, Y. H., Jang, J. W. & Hwang, J. M. (2018). An impact analysis of content reduction in high school mathematics curriculum on preparing next generation STEM majors. KAST research report 125.
  23. Lee, K. H., Kim, H. L., & Lee, S. H. (2022). Comparison of matrix in the mathematics textbooks in Korea, Singapore, and Australia. School Mathematics, 24(1), 57-88. http://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2022.3.24.1.57
  24. Lee, S. G., & Ham, Y. M. (2006). J. J. Sylvester, F. Klein and American mathematics in 19th century, Journal for history of mathematics, 19(2). 77-88.
  25. Lee, S. G., Lee, J. H., & Ham, Y. M. (2012). Early history of linear algebra. Communications of mathematical education, 26(4), 351-362. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2012.26.4.351
  26. Lee, S. M. (2012). A case study on the competency-based curriculum development in Hessen. The Korean Society for Curriculum Studies, 30(1), 151-174.
  27. Lee, T. H., & Kim, J. (2017). Understanding textbooks. Hakjisa.
  28. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics and Curriculum. Ministry of Education. Announcement No. 2015-74 [Appendix 8].
  29. Ministry of Education (2022). Mathematics and Curriculum. Ministry of Education. Announcement No. 2022-33 [Appendix 8].
  30. Nam, G. Y., Maeng, U. K., & Ko, H. K. (2012). Korean language, English, and mathematics teachers' perceptions on selecting textbooks. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 16(3), 603-627. http://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2012.16.3.603
  31. Oh, E. J. (2013). A Study of the Efficient Ways to Teach Matrices in High School [Master's thesis, The Graduate School of Education of In-ha University].
  32. Pang, J. S., & Oh, M. Y. (2022). Research trends of mathematics textbooks: An analysis of the journal articles published from 1963 to 2021. The Mathematical Education, 61(3), 457-476. http://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2022.61.3.457
  33. Park, K. M. et al. (2015). Study on development of mathematics curriculum according to 2015 revised curriculum II. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
  34. Park, S. Y., & Han, S. Y. (2018). Reconstruction and application of reforming textbook problems for mathematical modeling process. The Mathematical Education, 57(3), 289-309. http://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2018.57.3.289
  35. Rubdy, R.(2003). Selection of materials. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 37-57). Continuum.
  36. Schmidt, W., & Tatto, M. T. (2017). The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 47, 23-37.
  37. Sheldon, L. E.(1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4). 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.4.237
  38. Shin, Y. S. et al. (2011). A study on mathematics and curriculum based on the 2009 revised national curriculum. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
  39. Stein, M. K.., Remillard, J. T., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. (pp. 319-369). Information Age.
  40. Strang, G. (2019). Linear agebra and its applications (4th edition). Cengage Learning.
  41. Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S. L., Ingvarson, L., Rowley, G., Peck, R., & Rodriguez, M. (2008). Teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-M): Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics: conceptual framework. IEA.
  42. Yoo, B. S. (2008). Comparative study on mathematics textbook of Korea and U.S.A.: Focused on matrix [Unpublished Master's thesis, Hanyang University].