DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

What Influences YouTube Viewers' Job Engagement? The Role of Vlog Content Characteristics, Vlogger Characteristics, and Educational Value

  • Minhee Son (Dept. of Business Administration, Dongguk University-WISE Campus) ;
  • Moon-Yong Kim (College of Business, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • Received : 2023.02.05
  • Accepted : 2023.02.08
  • Published : 2023.05.31

Abstract

YouTube has become a popular platform for vlogs. Among various forms of vlogs, office worker vlogs, in which a person engaged in a specific job shows his/her work environment and daily routine, are gaining popularity. Thus, focusing on office worker vlogs, the present research investigates the effects of office worker vlogs' characteristics (i.e., vlog content characteristics, vlogger characteristics) on the YouTube viewers' educational value of the vlog and their job engagement. Specifically, this research examines whether(1) vlog content characteristics (i.e., usefulness, accessibility, and vividness) and (2) vlogger characteristics (i.e., job similarity, credibility, and expertise) influence the YouTube viewers' educational value of the vlog. Moreover, this research examines how the YouTube viewers' educational value of the vlog affects their job engagement. With a sample of YouTube viewers of office worker vlogs (N = 215), structural equation modelling was implemented to investigate the relationships in the proposed model. The results indicate that (1) perceived usefulness of the office worker vlog is positively associated with the educational value of the vlog; (2) perceived accessibility of the office worker vlog is positively associated with the educational value of the vlog, albeit marginally significant; (3) perceived vividness of the office worker vlog is positively associated with the educational value of the vlog; (4) perceived job similarity to the office worker vlogger is positively associated with the educational value of the vlog; (5) perceived credibility of the office worker vlogger is positively associated with the educational value of the vlog; (6) perceived expertise of the office worker vlogger is positively associated with the educational value of the vlog; and (7) the educational value of the office worker vlog is positively associated with the YouTube viewers' job engagement. The findings provide important implications for the production and use of office worker vlog contents.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Dongguk University-WISE Campus Research Fund. This work was supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund of 2022.

References

  1. R. Batra and K. L. Keller, "Integrating Marketing Communications: New Findings, New Lessons, and New Ideas," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 80, No. 6, pp. 122-145, Nov 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0419 
  2. R. Ladhari, E. Massa, and H. Skandrani, "YouTube Vloggers' Popularity and Influence: The Roles of Homophily, Emotional Attachment, and Expertise," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 54, No. 102027, pp. 1-11, May 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102027 
  3. J. E. Lee and B. Watkins, "YouTube Vloggers' Influence on Consumer Luxury Brand Perceptions and Intentions," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69, No. 12, pp. 5753-5760, Dec 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171 
  4. S. R, Hill, I. Troshani, and D. Chandrasekar, "Signalling Effects of Vlogger Popularity on Online Consumers," Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 76-84, Jan 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2017.1400929 
  5. D. J. Welbourne and J. G. Will, "Science Communication on YouTube: Factors That Affect Channel and Video Popularity," Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 706-718, Aug 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515572068 
  6. I. Dubovi and I. Tabak, "An Empirical Analysis of Knowledge Co-Construction in YouTube Comments," Computers & Education, Vol. 156, 103939, Oct 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103939 
  7. J. Burgess and J. Green, "The Entrepreneurial Vlogger: Participatory Culture beyond the Professional-Amateur Divide," The YouTube Reader, pp. 89-107, Dec 2009. 
  8. S. Sugihandoko, A. Pradhanawati, A. R. Herawati, and A. Purwanti, "Vlog Effectiveness for Public Offers in Socializing the Public Service," International Journal of Social Science Research, Vol. 4, No.4, 350-360, Dec 2022. 
  9. H. Song, Y. Nam, J. Gould, W. S. Sanders, M. McLaughlin, J. Fulk, K. A. Meeske, and K. S. Ruccione, "Cancer Survivor Identity Shared in a Social Media Intervention," Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing: Official Journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses, Vol. 29, No.2, pp. 80-91, Dec 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454212438964 
  10. C. D. Norman and A. L. Yip, "eHealth Promotion and Social Innovation with Youth: Using Social and Visual Media to Engage Diverse Communities," Advancing Cancer Education and Healthy Living in Our Communities, Vol. 172, pp. 54-70, IOS Press, 2012. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-088-8-54 
  11. C. J. Greenberg and L. Wang, "Building Health Literacy among an Urban Teenage Population by Creating Online Health Videos for Public and School Health Curriculum Use," Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 135-146, Apr 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15398285.2012.673459 
  12. S. Chattopadhyay, D. Ford, and T. Zimmermann, "Developers Who Vlog: Dismantling Stereotypes through Community and Identity," Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, No. CSCW2, pp. 1-33, Oct 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3479530 
  13. R. Filieri, F. Acikgoz, and H. Du, "Electronic Word-of-Mouth from Video Bloggers: The Role of Content Quality and Source Homophily across Hedonic and Utilitarian Products," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 160, pp. 113774, May 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113774 
  14. M. Mehmetoglu and M. Engen, "Pine and Gilmore's Concept of Experience Economy and Its Dimensions: An Empirical Examination in Tourism," Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 237-255, Oct 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008x.2011.541847 
  15. J. E. Bailey and S. W. Pearson, "Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction," Management Science, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 530-545, May 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530 
  16. F. D. Davis, "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319-340, Sep 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 
  17. C. M. K. Cheung, K.O. L. Matthew, and N. Rabjohn, "The Impact of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: The Adoption of Online Opinions in Online Customer Communities," Internet Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 229-247, Jun 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810883290 
  18. I. Erkan and C. Evan, "The Influence of eWOM in Social Media on Consumers' Purchase Intentions: An Extended Approach to Information Adoption," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 61, pp. 47-55, Aug 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.003 
  19. S. W. Sussman and W. S. Siegal, "Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption," Information Systems Research, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 47-65, Mar 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.1.47.14767 
  20. Y. Lee and J. Koo, "Athlete Endorsement, Attitudes, and Purchase Intention: The Interaction Effect between Athlete Endorser-Product Congruence and Endorser Credibility," Journal of Sport Management, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 523-538, Sep 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2014-0195 
  21. C. M. K. Cheung, S. X. Bo, and L. B. L. Ivy, "Do Actions Speak Louder than Voices? The Signaling Role of Social Information Cues in Influencing Consumer Purchase Decisions," Decision Support Systems, Vol. 65, pp. 50-58, Sep 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.05.002 
  22. D. D. Gunawan and K. H. Huang, "Viral Effects of Social Network and Media on Consumers' Purchase Intention," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 68, No. 11, pp. 2237-2241, Nov 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.004 
  23. A. Mafael, S. A. Gottschalk, and H. Kreis, "Examining Biased Assimilation of Brand-related Online Reviews," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 91-106, Nov 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.06.002 
  24. J. P. Sampson and J. W. Bloom, "The Potential for Success and Failure of Computer Applications in Counseling and Guidance," In D. C. Locke, J. Myers, and E. L. Herr (Eds.), The Handbook of Counseling, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 613-627, 2001. 
  25. E. T. Loiacono, R. T. Watson, and L. Goodhue, "WebQual: A Measure of Website Quality," Marketing Theory and Applications, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 432-438, 
  26. P. A. Pavlou, H. Liang, and Y. Xue, "Understanding, and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective,"MIS Quarterly, pp. 105-136, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148783 
  27. Y. L. Lee and S. Song, "An Empirical Investigation of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational Motive and Corporate Response Strategy," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 1073-1080, Sep 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.009 
  28. N. Stylos and J. Zwiegelaar, "Big Data as a Game Changer: How Does It Shape Business Intelligence Within a Tourism and Hospitality Industry Context?" Big Data and Innovation in Tourism, Travel, and Hospitality: Managerial Approaches, Techniques, and Applications, pp. 163-181, Feb 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6339-9_11 
  29. H. H. Chang and L. H. Wu, "An Examination of Negative e-WOM Adoption: Brand Commitment as a Moderator," Decision Support Systems, Vol. 59, pp. 206-218, Mar 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.11.008 
  30. Q. Xu, "Should I Trust Him? The Effects of Reviewer Profile Characteristics on eWOM Credibility," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 33, pp.136-144, Apr 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.027 
  31. J. G. Park and J. Lee, "Knowledge Sharing in Information Systems Development Projects: Explicating the Role of Dependence and Trust," International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 153-165, Jan 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.02.004 
  32. D. H. Cheon and H. J. Lee, "A Study of Effect on Trust, Acceptance and Spread of Word-of-Mouth and Purchase Intention by Characteristics of Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Travel Industry," The Academy of Customer Satisfaction Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 83-100, 2012. 
  33. M. C. Gilly, J. L. Graham, M. F. Wolfinbarger, and L. J. Yale, "A Dyadic Study of Interpersonal Information Search," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 83-100, Apr 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398262001 
  34. J. B. Gotlieb and D. Sarel, "Comparative Advertising Effectiveness: The Role of Involvement and Source Credibility," Journal of Advertising, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 38-45, Mar 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1991.10673205 
  35. R. Filieri, F. McLeay, B. Tsui, and Z. Lin, "Consumer Perceptions of Information Helpfulness and Determinants of Purchase Intention in Online Consumer Reviews of Services," Information & Management, Vol. 55, No. 8, pp. 956- 970, Dec 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.04.010 
  36. G. Onofrei, R. Filieri, and L. Kennedy, "Social Media Interactions, Purchase Intention, and Behavioral Engagement: The Mediating Role of Source and Content Factors," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 142, pp. 100-112, Mar 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.031 
  37. B. Zhang, Z. Cao, C. Z. Qin, and X. Yang, "Fashion and Homophily," Operations Research, Vol. 66, No. 6, pp. 1486-1497, Nov 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2018.1744 
  38. E. M. Steffes and L. E. Burgee, "Social Ties, and Online Word of Mouth," Internet Research, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 42-59, Jan 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240910927812 
  39. L. Lu and Y. Yuan, "A Novel TOPSIS Evaluation Scheme for Cloud Service Trustworthiness Combining Objective and Subjective Aspects," Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 143, pp. 71-86, Sep 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.004 
  40. J. Lu and H. Bai, "Information Usefulness and Attitude Formation a Double-Dependent Variable Model (DDV) to Examine the Impacts of Online Reviews on Consumers," Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 1-22, Aug 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.20211101.oa29 
  41. J. T. Cacioppo, R. E. Petty, C. F. Kao, and R. Rodriguez, "Central and Peripheral Routesto Persuasion: An Individual Difference Perspective," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 5, 1032-1043, Nov 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1032 
  42. H. N. Shivaprasad and A. Rani, "Building Web-Analytics System to Measure Perceived Source Credibility in Electronic Word of Mouth Communication," International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 1-13, Apr 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijissc.2020040101 
  43. M. Y. Cheung, C. Luo, C. L. Sia, and H. Chen, "Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-Line Consumer Recommendations," International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 9-38, Jul 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/jec1086-4415130402 
  44. E. Ismagilova, E. L. Slade, N. P. Rana, and Y. K. Dwivedi, "The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth Communications on Intention to Buy: A Meta-Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Vol. 22, pp. 1203-1226, Oct 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09924-y 
  45. R. Ohanian, "Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers' Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness," Journal of Advertising, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 39-52, Oct 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191 
  46. C. I. Hovland, I. L. Janis, and H. Kelley, Communication and Persuasion, 1953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02713272
  47. L. J. Yale and M. C. Gilly, "Dyadic Perceptions in Personal Source Information Search," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 225-237, Mar 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)00048-j 
  48. C. N. Wathen and J. Burkell, "Believe It or Not: Factors Influencing Credibility on the Web," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 134-144, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10016 
  49. D. H. Tien, A. A. A. Rivas, and Y. K. Liao, "Examining the Influence of Customer-to-Customer Electronic Wordof-Mouth on Purchase Intention in Social Networking Sites," Asia Pacific Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 238-249, Sep 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.06.003 
  50. R. R. Harmon and K. A. Coney, "The Persuasive Effects of Source Credibility in Buy and Lease Situations," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 255-260, May 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900209 
  51. C. Pornpitakpan, "The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp.243-281, Feb 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x 
  52. W. B. Schaufeli and A. B. Bakker, "Job Demands, Job Resources, and Their Relationship with Burnout and Engagement: A Multi-Sample Study," Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 293-315, May 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248 
  53. M. M. Mackay, J. A. Allen, and R. S. Landis, "Investigating the Incremental Validity of Employee Engagement in the Prediction of Employee Effectiveness: A Meta-Analytic Path Analysis," Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 108-120, May 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.03.002 
  54. R. Alafeshat and C. Tanova, "Servant Leadership Style and High-Performance Work System Practices: Pathway to a Sustainable Jordanian Airline Industry," Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 22, 6191, Nov 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226191 
  55. M. S. Christian, A. S. Garza, and J. E. Slaughter, "Work Engagement: A Quantitative Review and Test of Its Relations with Task and Contextual Performance," Personnel Psychology, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 89-136, Mar 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x 
  56. G. Caesens, F. Stinglhamber, and M. Ohana, "Perceived Organizational Support and Well-Being: A Weekly Study," Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 7, pp. 1214-1230, Sep 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-01-2016-0002 
  57. A. L. Kristof, "Person-Organization Fit: An Integrative Review of Its Conceptualizations, Measurement, and Implications," Personnel Psychology, Vol.49, No. 1, pp. 1-49, Mar 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x 
  58. R. D. Caplan, "Person-Environment Fit: Past, Present and Future," In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Stress Research, pp. 35-78, Wiley, 1983. 
  59. J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing, "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended TwoStep Approach," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 411-423, May 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411