DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the mesh size selectivity by alternate haul method of trawl using the SELECT model

SELECT 모델을 이용한 트롤 비교 시험조업법에 의한 망목 선택성에 관한 연구

  • Seonghun KIM (Department of Marine Production System Management, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Hyungseok KIM (Department of Marine Production System Management, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Sena BAEK (Department of Fisheries Physics, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Jaehyung KIM (Department of Fisheries Physics, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Pyungkwan KIM (Fisheries Engineering Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science)
  • 김성훈 (부경대학교 해양생산시스템관리학부) ;
  • 김형석 (부경대학교 해양생산시스템관리학부) ;
  • 백세나 (부경대학교 대학원 수산물리학과) ;
  • 김재형 (부경대학교 대학원 수산물리학과) ;
  • 김병관 (국립수산과학원 수산공학과)
  • Received : 2023.01.31
  • Accepted : 2023.04.25
  • Published : 2023.05.31

Abstract

In this study, a comparative test operation was conducted through the alternate haul method to examine the selectivity of the four mesh sizes (60 mm, 90 mm, 110 mm, and 130 mm) of the trawl codend. The selectivity was analyzed using the SELECT model considering the fishing efficiency (split parameter) of each fishing gear in the comparative test fishing operation in the trawl and the maximum likelihood method for parameter estimation. A selectivity master curve was estimated for several mesh sizes using the extended-SELECT model. As a result of analyzing the selectivity for silver croaker based on the results of three times hauls for each experimental gear, it was found that the size of the fish caught increased as the size of the mesh size increased. When the selectivity for each mesh size analyzed by the SELECT model considering the split ratio was evaluated based on the size of the AIC value, the estimated split model was superior to the equal split model. Based on the master curve, the 50% selection length value was 2.893, which was estimated to be 136 mm based on the mesh size of 60 mm. In some selectivity models, there was a large deviance between observed and theoretical values due to the non-uniformity of the distribution of fished length classes. As a result, it is considered that appropriate sea trials and selectivity evaluation methods with high reliability should be applied to present trawl fishery resource management methods.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국립수산과학원 수산시험연구사업(R2023008)의 지원에 의해 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Contr AC-19, 716-723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
  2. Aoyama T. 1965. Selective action of trawl nets on fish. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 31, 10.
  3. Erzini K, Goncalves JMS, Bentes L, Moutopoulos DK, Casal JAH, Soriguer MC, Puente E, Errazkin LA and Stergiou K. 2006. Size selectivity of trammel nets in southern European small-scale fisheries. Fish Res 79, 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2006.03.004.
  4. Fujimori Y and Tokai T. 2001. Estimation of gill net selectivity curves by maximum likelihood method. Fish Sci 67, 644-654. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2001.00301.x.
  5. Hiramatsu K. 1992. A statistical study of fish population dynamics using maximum likelihood method -parameter estimation and model selection. Bull Natl Inst Far Seas Fish 29, 57-114.
  6. Kim S, Lee JH, Kim HS and Park SW. 2010. Optimal design of escape vent for the dome type coonstrip shrimp (Pandalus hypsinotus) pot. J Korean Soc Fish Ocean Technol 46, 115-125. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2010.46.2.115.
  7. Kim S, Jeong SJ, Park CD and Kim P. 2020. Study on the mesh selectivity of a drum shaped pot for finely-striate buccinum (Buccinum striatissimum) in the eastern coastal waters of Korea. J Korean Soc Fish Ocean Technol 56, 193-201. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFOT.2020.56.3.193.
  8. Kim S, Jung JJ and Baek S. 2022. An experimental study on the mesh size selectivity for whelk (Buccinum opisthoplectum). Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology 58, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFOT.2022.58.1.001.
  9. Kwon IY and Kim TH. 2021. Entering behavior and fishing capacity on pot for Octopus minor by mesh size. J Korean Soc Fish Ocean Technol 57, 185-193. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFOT.2021.57.3.185.
  10. Millar RB and Walsh DJ. 1992. Analysis of trawl selectivity studies with an application to trouser trawls. Fish Res 13, 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(92)90077-7.
  11. Millar RB and Fryer RJ. 1999. Estimating the size-selection curves of towed gears, traps, nets and hooks. Rev Fish Biol Fish 9, 89-116. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008838220001
  12. Nabeshima Y, Abe T, Yamamoto S, Omoto S and Tokai T. 1995. Establishment of minimum permissible capture length and selection of its appropriate mesh sizes of basket trap targeting white-spotted conger eel Conger myriaster (Brevoort) for fisheries oriented resource management, and its estimated effect. Bull Osaka Pref Fish Exp Stn 9, 41-55.
  13. Nishiuchi S. 1999. Mesh selectivity of hair crab pots for male hair crabs (Erimacrus isenbeckii). Sci Rep Hokkaido Fish Exp Stn 55, 131-139.
  14. NFRDI (National Fisheries Research and Development Institute). 2004. Commercial fishes of the coastal & offshore waters in Korea. Nati Fish Res Dev Inst, Busan, Korea, 333.
  15. O'Neill FG and Kynoch RJ. 1996. The effect of cover mesh size and cod-end catch size on cod-end selectivity. Fish Res 28, 291-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(96)00501-2.
  16. Pope JA, Margetts AR, Hamley JM and Akyuz EF. 1975. Manual of methods for fish stock assessment part III. Selectivity of fishing gear. FAO Fish Techn Paper 41, 3-6.
  17. Reeves SA, Armstrong DW, Fryer RJ and Coull KA. 1992. The effects of mesh size, cod-end extension length and cod-end diameter on the selectivity of Scottish trawls and seines. ICES J of Mar Sci 49, 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.3.279.
  18. Tokai T. 1997. Maximum likelihood parameter estimates of a mesh selectivity logistic model through SOLVER on MS-Excel. Bull Jpn Soc Fish Oceanogr 61, 288-298.
  19. Uchida K, Tokai T, Mituhashi T, Fuxiang H and Matuda K. 2000. Size selectivity of net-pot for white-spotted conger eel estimated from paired-gear tests with change in sampling effort. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 66, 228-235. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.66.228
  20. Wileman DA, Ferro RST, Fonteyne R and Millar RB (Eds.). 1996. Manual of methods of measuring the selectivity of towed fishing gears. ICES Cooperative Research report 215, 132. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.4628.
  21. Xu X and Millar RB. 1993. Estimation of trap selectivity for male snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) and using the SELECT modeling approach with unequal sampling effort. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50, 2485-2490. https://doi.org/10.1139/f93-273.