Human Ecology Research

The Korean Home Economics Association (대한가정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study on Portfolio Assessment in a Home Economics Cohousing Class for Process-based Assessment

과정 중심 평가를 위한 가정교과 코하우징 수업의 포트폴리오 평가 사례연구

  • Seong Youn Choi (Department of Home Economics Education, Chonnam National University)
  • 최성연 (전남대학교 가정교육과)
  • Received : 2023.03.06
  • Accepted : 2023.03.23
  • Published : 2023.05.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to present a class case that verified the validity, reliability, and usefulness of a portfolio assessment in a cohousing class in the housing area of home economics. To achieve this objective, 241 male and female students in eight classes of the third grade of a junior high school in Gyeonggi-do, Korea, were enrolled in a project class on establishing a cohousing village in which the portfolio assessment method was applied for a total of 10 sessions for approximately four weeks from May 24 to June 16, 2021. To ensure the validity of the portfolio assessment, we designed the lesson after presenting the curriculum goals in detail using the backward design model and developed a specific rubric and conducted all evaluations and feedback based on the rubric to ensure objectivity and reliability. The online tool Padlet was used as a portfolio, which allowed students to easily upload their work, receive feedback from the teacher, and interact with their peers. After the class, the students reflected on the rubric and were generally satisfied with the class using portfolio assessment. This study is expected to facilitate the use of the portfolio assessment method in the classroom, while also supporting student growth and development.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, H. S. (1997). An explolative review of quality control on portfolio evaluation. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 10(1), 75-104.
  2. Baek, S. G., & Yoon, S. H. (2011). The effect of video portfolio assessment and feedback methods on teacher's practical teaching competence. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 24(4), 849-871.
  3. Byun, J. H.(2013). A case study on general English writing class using portfolio keeping and peer feedback. English21, 26(1), 203-232. https://doi.org/10.35771/ENGDOI.2013.26.1.010
  4. Cho, J. H., & Choi, J. S. (2009). A case on residens' participation workshop for cohousing plan. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 27(6), 155-169.
  5. Cho, J. S. (2017). Differences in motivation to move in, participation in common activities, and life satisfaction of Swedish +40 cohousing residents according to intention to move. Journal of Korean Home Management Association. 35 (4), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2017.35.4.43
  6. Cho, J. W., & Cho, J. S. (2020). Development and evaluation of the PBL teaching/learning process plan of 'housing culture and practical space use' for home economics in middle school. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 32(2), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2020.06.32.2.59
  7. Cho, W. J., Choi, I. S., & Kim, E. Y. (2011). Developing rubrics for assessment for a teaching portfolio in kindergarten. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 15(6), 213-235.
  8. Cho, Y. G. (2009). A study on a tentative plan of the teaching portfolio development model and rubric for qualitative improvement of instruction in instructors. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(2), 47-73. https://doi.org/10.24211/TJKTE.2009.26.2.47
  9. Cho, Y. H., Park, H. J., Kim, J. Y., Suk, Y. M., & Lee, S. H. (2015). Exploring roles of feedback to facilitate online discussion. Asian Journal of Education, 16(2), 289-313.
  10. Choi, M. S., Lee, A. H., & Jung, M. A. (2020). Interaction Teaching Method Using Edutech. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  11. Columba, L., & Dolgos, K. A. (1995). Portfolio assessment in mathematics. Reading Improvement, 32(3), 174-176.
  12. Han, J. Y. (2006). The influence of student-generated rubrics on reliability of grade result in technology education assessment. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 25(3), 87-110.
  13. Jeon, Y. J., & Lee, J. H. (2019). A practice of process-focused assessment for mathematical subject competency in elementary mathematics classroom. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 22(3), 199-219. https://doi.org/10.30807/KSMS.2019.22.3.002
  14. Ju, S. E., & Yang, J. S. (2021). Development and application of online teaching and learning activities for home economics curriculum and instructions using flipped learning. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 25(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2021.25.1.1
  15. Jung, H. J. (2016). A study on mathematics process-based assessment: Focused on the application case of the second grade of elementary mathematics. Studies in Mathematical Education, 2016(3), 40-46.
  16. Jung, W. J., & Kim, Y. J. (2022). A comparative study on student achievement of paper-assessment and process-focused assessment in middle school science class. Biology Education, 50(2), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2022.50.2.265
  17. Kang, E. Y., & Park, M. J. (2020). Development and implementation of a process-based evaluation program on school space design: focusing on the housing life area of home economics curriculum in middle school. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 32(4), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2020.12.32.4.81
  18. Kim, C. J. (2012). Portfolio instruction and portfolio assessment : focused on science education. Paju: Kyoyookbook.
  19. Kim, C. J., & Choi, M. A. (2002). Developing scoring rubric and the reliability of elementary science portfolio assessment. Journal of the Korean association for science education, 22(1), 176-189.
  20. Kim, C. J., & Yoon, S. A. (2002). Contents validity of and information from elementary students' science portfolio assessment. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(1), 190-203.
  21. Kim, J. I., & Chae, J. H. (2009). Effect of instruction for the learner-involved development of analytical rubrics on the learning motivation of middle school students: focusing on the unit of 'housing'. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 21(1), 35-49.
  22. Kim, J. S., & Yi, S. B. (2016). Development of instructional process plan and performance assessment instrument for 'understanding of adolescents' unit at the subject 'technology - home economics' in middle school. The Journal of Practical Arts Education Research, 22(1), 241-260.
  23. Kim, M. H., & Cho, J. S. (2011). Development and evaluation of the cohousing teaching.learning plan. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 23(2), 55-69.
  24. Kim, S. H. (2018). Development of clothing life education to cultivate subject competencies based on 2015 revised technology & home economics curriculum : focusing on integration of the curriculum-class-evaluation. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 30(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2018.03.30.1.115
  25. Kim, S. N. (2020). The concept analysis and application proposal of process based assessment. Journal of Education & Culture, 26(5), 317-334.
  26. Kim, S. S. (2017). Understanding and applying process-based assessment. KICE Educational Plaza, 64, 12-15.
  27. Ko, E. M., Heo, Y. S., & Chae, J. H. (2021). Development of the teaching-learning process plan for process-based assessment in home economics of middle school: Focusing on the life design unit. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 33(1), 101-127. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.3.33.1.101
  28. Ko, H. G. (2020). A study on the application of process-fortified assessment in art subject based on 2015 revised national art curriculum. Journal of Art Education, 60, 79-106.
  29. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. (2018). A study on the improvement of school-level student assessment system by process-based assessment(2018 KICE issue paper: ORM 2018-39-7). Jincheon : Author.
  30. Kwak, Y. S., & Ha, J. H. (2020). Analysis of application status of process-centered assessment in elementary school science classes. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(5), 463-471.
  31. Kwon, E. M., & Kang, M. K. (2019). A study on process-based assessment using google classroom. English Language & Literature Teaching, 25(4), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.35828/etak.2019.25.4.61
  32. Lee, G. S., Yoo, T. M., & Yang, J. S. (2018). Development of process-centered performance task for curriculum.Instruction.assessment alignment based on 2015 revised home economics curriculum. Journal of Korean Home Economics Association, 30(4), 165-185. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2018.12.30.4.165
  33. Lee, H. J., & Cho, B. E. (2014). The effect of using portfolio-based lessons on the development of self-identity of female middle school students and itstwo-year follow up - Focusing on the 'understanding adolescents' unit in middle school technology and home economics -. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 26(1), 119-134.
  34. Lee, H. J., & Lee, H. J. (2007). Development of portfolio material and analysis of instruction effect. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 19(1), 15-33.
  35. Lee, H. S., & Seo, E. H. (2021). Developing the evaluation method and teaching portfolio criteria for the innovational instruction in university. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(3), 353-372.
  36. Lee, M. J., & Cho, J. S. (2012). Development and implementation of teaching-learning plan for 'residence and living environment' of home economics applied with portfolio assessment. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 24(3), 225-239.
  37. Lee, M. Y. (2019). A case study of process-based evaluation and capacity enhancement on moral education. Paper presented at the 2019 winter conference of the Korea Society for Moral & Ethics Education Association, Seoul, Korea.
  38. Lee, S. J., & Kim, J. S. (2003). Development of portfolio assessment instrument of electrical.electronic unit in the elementary practical arts subject. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 9(2), 91-105.
  39. McCamant, K., & Durrett, C. (1994). Cohousing, a contemporary approach to housing ourselves. Baltimore: Ten speed press.
  40. Ministry of Education. (2015). General guidelines of 2015 Revised curriculum. Ministry of education notice 2015-74, Sejong: Author
  41. Ministry of Education. (2021a). Feedback competency enhancement program for Process-based assessment teacher. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
  42. Ministry of Education. (2021b). General guidelines of 2022 revised curriculum for elementary and secondary education. Ministry of Education Notice 2022-33, Sejong: Author.
  43. Na, J. M., & Cho, J. S. (2016). Development and application of the teaching-learning process plan of senior cohousing for independent later life. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 28(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2016.09.28.3.1
  44. Oh, J. G. (2021). Experience in the operation of middle school physical education process fortified assessment. Educational Research, 80, 353-368. https://doi.org/10.17253/swueri.2021.80..017
  45. Park, H. M., & Paik, S. H. (2000). A study of portfolio assessment regarding feedback fitted into elementary school science classes. Chungram Science Education Research, 10(1), 214-227.
  46. Park, H. M., & Paik, S. H. (2001). The effects of lessons adopting portfolio assessment regarding feedback on elementary school student's scientific knowledge, inquiry ability, and their perception. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(1), 22-29.
  47. Park, H. S., & Ha, M. K. (2013). A study on the characteristics and the preferences for the type of cohousing-Focus on the classification by architectural characteristics. Journal of Korean Design Knowledge, 27, 33-42.
  48. Shin, H. J. (2021). Discussion on teacher-specific/process-oriented moral education evaluation for the high school credit system. Journal of Moral & Ethics Education, 73 , 81-106. https://doi.org/10.18338/kojmee.2021..73.81
  49. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve students performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  50. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
  51. Yang, J. S., & Lee, G. S. (2020). Strengthening the instruction-assessment alignment: development of items for essay-type assessment based on the achievement standards. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association , 32 (3), 135-159. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2020.09.32.3.135
  52. Yoo, Y. S. (2017). Process-oriented assessment. Seoul: Tekville.