DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Relationship between Participative Leadership and Subordinates' Innovative Behavior: The Serial Multiple Mediating Effects of Knowledge Sharing and Creativity

참여적 리더십이 구성원의 혁신행위에 미치는 영향: 지식공유와 창의성의 직렬다중 매개효과

  • Le Wang (Department of Business Administration, Gachon University) ;
  • Xiu, Jin (Department of Business Administration, Gachon University)
  • 왕러 (가천대학교 일반대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 김수 (가천대학교 경영학부)
  • Received : 2022.12.09
  • Accepted : 2023.04.20
  • Published : 2023.04.28

Abstract

Organizational members' innovative behavior is a key element that promotes organizational growth and sustainability. With today's unstable environment of economic and market , the importance of employees' innovative behavior is being emphasized. The reason is that employees' innovative behaviors play an important role in securing a organizational competitiveness. Based on this, this study focused on ways to improve employees' innovation behavior. Specifically, the causal relationship between participatory leadership and employees' innovative behavior was identified and the influence of innovative behavior was also verified. Furthermore, in the process of participatory leadership influencing employees' innovative behavior, the serial multiple mediating effect of knowledge sharing and creativity was verified. In order to demonstrate the hyphotheses, this study focused on 237 employees who work in Chinese SMEs. The results of the empirical analysis showed that participatory leadership had a positive effect on knowledge sharing, creativity, and innovative behavior. In addition, the serial multiple mediating effects of knowledge sharing and creativity on the relationship between participatory leadership and innovative behavior was significant. Overall, this study verified the positive role of participatory leadership that enhances employees' innovative behavior in Chinese SMEs and contributed to expanding the research field related to employees' innovative behavior through serial multiple mediating model.

조직구성원의 혁신행동은 기업의 성장과 지속가능성을 촉진할 수 있는 중요한 요소이다. 오늘날 경제 시장 환경이 불안정함에 따라 조직구성원들의 혁신행동의 중요성이 날로 강조되고 있는 실정이며 이러한 혁신행동이 기업의 경쟁력을 확보하는데 중요한 역할을 한다. 이를 바탕으로 본 연구는 혁신행동의 향상 방안에 초점을 맞추었다. 구체적으로 참여적 리더십과 구성원의 혁신행동 간의 인과관계를 규명하고 영향력을 검증하였다. 더 나아가 참여적 리더십이 혁신행동에 영향을 미치는 과정에서 지식공유와 창의성의 직렬다중 매개효과도 검증하였다. 이를 검증하기 위해 중국 중소기업에 종사하는 구성원 237명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 실증분석 결과에서 참여적 리더십은 지식공유, 창의성, 혁신행동에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 참여적 리더십과 혁신행동 간의 관계에서 지식공유와 창의성의 유의한 직렬다중매개효과가 검증되었다. 전반적으로 본 연구는 중국 중소기업 조직에서 혁신행동을 이끌어 낼 수 있는 참여적 리더십의 긍정적인 역할을 검증하였으며 직렬다중매개효과를 통해 혁신행동에 대한 연구 영역을 확장하는데 기여하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Li, L., Tao, H. Y., & Song, H. (2022). Multilevel Influence of Platform Leadership on Employee Proactive Innovative Behavior. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 39(13), 132-140. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.C202107411
  2. Lin, X. Q., Luan, Y. X., Zhao, K., & Zhao, G. L. (2022). A meta-analysis of the relationship between leadership styles and employee creative performance: A self-determination perspective. Advances in Psychological Science, 30(4), 781-801. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00781
  3. Ge, Y. H., & Zhao, H. (2022). On Relationship between Intensity of Human Resource Management and Employee Innovative Behavior. West Forum on Economy and Management, 33(1), 87-96. DOI:10.12181/jjgl.2022.01.09
  4. Xu, S., Yang, Z., Liu, P. Q., Yang, F., & Zhao, L. (2022). Intimacy for Innovation: the Stimulating Mechanism of Authentic Leadership Style on New Employees' Innovative Behavior. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 39(19), 132-140. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.2021050491
  5. Fatima, T., Majeed, M., & Saeed, I. (2017). Does participative leadership promote innovative work behavior: the moderated mediation model. Business & Economic Review, 9(4), 139-156. DOI:dx.doi.org/10.22547/BER/9.4.7
  6. Zhang, Z. G., Yu, C. P., & Li, Y. J. (2016). The Relationship among Proactive Personality, Knowledge Sharing and Employee's Innovation Behavior. Management Review, 28(4), 123-133. DOI:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2016.04.013
  7. Peng, J., Zou, Y. C., Kang, Y. J., & Zhang, X. (2021). The Paradoxical Effect of Participative Leadership on Employee Job Well-Being: Perceived Co-Worker Support as a Boundary Condition. Journal of Psychological science, 44(4), 873-880. DOI:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20210415
  8. Zhang, C., Zhu, J., Duan, J. Y., & Tian, X. M. (2016). Participative Leadership and Employee Voice: The Moderating Role of Self-Construal. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 22(1), 26-36.
  9. Koopman, P. L., & Wierdsma, A. F. M. (1998). Participative management. Handbook of work and organizational psychology, 3, 297-324.
  10. Li, S. L., Long, L. R., & Zhu, Q. Q. (2015). Pursuing Change Collaboratively: The Influence Mechanism of Participative Leadership on Employees'Taking Charge. FORECASTING, 34(3), 1-7. DOI:10.11847/fj.34.3.1
  11. Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in organizational behavior, 28, 3-34. DOI:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
  12. Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of management, 36(4), 827-856. DOI: 10.1177/0149206310363732
  13. Chen, Y. F., & Tjosvold, D. (2006). Participative leadership by American and Chinese managers in China: The role of relationships. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1727-1752. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00657.x
  14. House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1975). Path-goal theory of leadership. Washington Univ Seattle Dept Of Psychology.
  15. Spreitzer, G. (2007). Participative organizational leadership, empowerment, and sustainable peace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 1077-1096. DOI:10.1002/job.487
  16. Rok, B. (2009). Ethical context of the participative leadership model: taking people into account. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 9(4), 461-472. DOI:10.1108/14720700910985007
  17. Dorfmann, P. W., Hanges, P. J., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2004). Leadership and Cultural Variation: The Identification of Culturally Endorsed Leadership Profiles. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. The GLOBE Study of, 62(1), 669-719.
  18. Huang, X., Iun, J., Liu, A., & Gong, Y. (2010). Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non managerial subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 122-143. DOI:10.1002/job.636
  19. Somech, A. (2005). Directive versus participative leadership: Two complementary approaches to managing school effectiveness. Educational administration quarterly, 41(5), 777-800. DOI:10.1177/0013161X05279448
  20. Kim, S. (2002). Participative management and job satisfaction: Lessons for management leadership. Public administration review, 62(2), 231-241. DOI:10.1111/0033-3352.00173
  21. Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 9(1), 64-76. DOI:10.1177/107179190200900105
  22. Liebowitz, J. (1999). Knowledge management handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 999, 1-3.
  23. Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human resource development review, 2(4), 337-359. DOI:10.1177/1534484303257985
  24. Trivellas, P., Akrivouli, Z., Tsifora, E., & Tsoutsa, P. (2015). The impact of knowledge sharing culture on job satisfaction in accounting firms. The mediating effect of general competencies. Procedia Economics and Finance, 19, 238-247. DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00025-8
  25. Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and process management, 6(2), 91-100. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1441(199906)6:2<91::AID-KPM54>3.0.CO;2-M
  26. Lin, H. F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of information science, 33(2), 135-149. DOI:10.1177/0165551506068174
  27. Wu, S. Q., Huang, P. P., & Cao, X. Y. (2021). Enterprise Relational Capital, Knowledge Sharing and Enterprise Innovation Capability-Empirical research based on Advanced manufacturing industry technology alliance. Scientific Management Research, 39(1), 123-131. DOI:10.19445/j.cnki.15-1103/g3.2021.01.020
  28. Xu, H., Guo, P. B., & Bao, L. Y. (2021). Influence of Organizational Innovation Support on Innovative Behavior of Researchers: Chain Intermediary Effect of Creative Self-efficacy and Knowledge Sharing. Science and Technology Management Research, 8, 124-131. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2021.08.017
  29. Yang, H., Peng, C., Li, R. X., Yang, X. N., & Lv, C. L. (2021). Transformational Leadership, Knowledge Sharing and the Creativity of the R&D Team: A∩ Moderating Role of Team's Membership Heterogeneity. Operations research and management science, 30(1), 217-224. DOI:10.12005/orms.2021.0031
  30. Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of management journal, 43(2), 215-223. DOI:10.5465/1556378
  31. Lei, X. H., Shan, Z. W., Su, T. Y., & Yang, Y. F. (2015). Impacts of humble leadership behavior on employee creativity. Journal of Management Science, 28(2), 115-125. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2015.02.011
  32. Kampylis, P. G., & Valtanen, J. (2010). Redefining creativity-analyzing definitions, collocations, and consequences. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(3), 191-214. DOI:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01333.x
  33. Somech, A., & Khalaili, A. (2014). Team boundary activity: Its mediating role in the relationship between structural conditions and team innovation. Group & Organization Management, 39(3), 274-299. DOI:10.1177/1059601114525437
  34. Zhu, Y. Q., Gardner, D. G., & Chen, H. G. (2018). Relationships between work team climate, individual motivation, and creativity. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2094-2115. DOI:10.1177/0149206316638161
  35. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. Minneapolis, MN: West Publishing Company. The Academy of Management, 22(3), 802-805.
  36. Chen, L., Bai, S. J., & Wang, Y. M. (2016). CEO transformational leadership and TMT creativity: a moderated mediating model. Nankai Business Review, 19(2), 63-74.
  37. Wu, S. J., Gao, W. C., & Quan, Y. (2021). The Impact of Work Pressureon Employees Creativity: The Chain Mediating Effect of Regulatory Focus and Creative Self-efficacy. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 38(2), 132-140. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.2020070800
  38. Bai, J., & Wang, M. L. (2020). The Influence of Empowering Leadership on Creativity:From the Perspective of Work Meaningfulness. East China Economic Management, 34(7), 109-117. DOI:10.19629/j.cnki.34-1014/f.200211009
  39. Anderson, N., Potocnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of management, 40(5), 1297-1333. DOI:10.1177/0149206314527128
  40. Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International journal of manpower, 27(1), 75-90. DOI:10.1108/01437720610652853
  41. Kamasak, R., & Bulutlar, F.(2010). The influence of knowledge sharing on innovation. European Business Review, 22(3), 306-317. DOI:10.1108/09555341011040994
  42. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and organizational psychology, 73(3), 287-302. DOI:10.1348/096317900167038
  43. Gu, Y. D., & Peng, J. S. (2010). The effect of organizational creative climate on employees' creative behavior: The moderating effect of creative self-efficacy. Nankai Business Review, 13(1),
  44. Han, Y., & Yang, B. Y. (2011). The authentic leadership, the psychological capital and employees' innovative behavior: the mediating of the leading members. Manage. World, 12, 78-86. DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2011.12.008
  45. Gu, Y. D., Zhou, W. L., & Peng, J. S. (2014). Study on Influencing Mechanism of Perceived Organizational Support on R&D Staffs' Innovative Behaviors. Journal of Management Science, 27(1), 109-119. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2014.01.011
  46. Chang, Y. Y., Chang, C. Y., Chen, Y. C. K., Seih, Y. T., & Chang, S. Y. (2021). Participative leadership and unit performance: evidence for intermediate linkages. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(3), 355-369. DOI:10.1080/14778238.2020.1755208
  47. Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of management journal, 49(6), 1239-1251. DOI:10.5465/amj.2006.23478718
  48. Cunningham, J., Seaman, C., & McGuire, D. (2017). Perceptions of knowledge sharing among small family firm leaders: a structural equation model. Family Business Review, 30(2), 160-181. DOI:10.1177/0894486516682667
  49. Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The leadership quarterly, 15(1), 55-77. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.005
  50. Cai, W., Lin-Schilstra, L., Yang, C., & Fan, X. (2021). Does participation generate creativity? A dual-mechanism of creative self-efficacy and supervisor-subordinate guanxi. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(4), 541-554. DOI:10.1080/1359432X.2020.1864329
  51. Miao, Q., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Xu, L. (2013). Participative Leadership and the Organizational Commitment of Civil Servants in C hina: The Mediating Effects of Trust in Supervisor. British Journal of Management, 24, S76-S92. DOI:10.1111/1467-8551.12025
  52. Burpitt, W. J., & Bigoness, W. J. (1997). Leadership and innovation among teams: The impact of empowerment. Small group research, 28(3), 414-423. DOI:10.1177/1046496497283005
  53. Krause, D. E., Gebert, D., & Kearney, E. (2007). Implementing process innovations: The benefits of combining delegative-participative with consultative-advisory leadership. Journal of leadership & Organizational studies, 14(1), 16-25. DOI:10.1177/1071791907304224
  54. Chang, Y. Y., Chang, C. Y., Chen, C. W., Chen, Y. C. K., & Chang, S. Y. (2019). Firm-level participative leadership and individual-level employee ambidexterity: A multilevel moderated mediation analysis. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(5), 561-582. DOI:10.1108/LODJ-08-2018-0308
  55. Gardner, H. K., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. (2012). Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 998-1022. DOI:10.5465/amj.2010.0604
  56. Dong, Y., Bartol, K. M., Zhang, Z. X., & Li, C. (2017). Enhancing employee creativity via individual skill development and team knowledge sharing: Influences of dual-focused transformational leadership. Journal of organizational behavior, 38(3), 439-458. DOI:10.1002/job.2134
  57. Tu, X. Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, Z. Y., Zhao, Z. W., & He, X. (2017). Knowledge workers'intrinsic motivation,knowledge sharing intention and creativity. Science Research Management, 38 (10), 111-118. DOI:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2017.10.013
  58. Kim, T. T., & Lee, G. (2013). Hospitality employee knowledge-sharing behaviors in the relationship between goal orientations and service innovative behavior. International journal of hospitality management, 34, 324-337. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.04.009
  59. Pian, Q. Y., Jin, H., & Li, H. (2019). Linking knowledge sharing to innovative behavior: the moderating role of collectivism. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(8), 1652-1672. DOI:10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0753
  60. Jin, H., Sheng, Y. X., & Luo, X. F.(2020). The Transformation from Knowledge Sharing to Innovative Behavior: The Moderating Role of Collectivism. Soft Science, 34(2), 92-97. DOI:10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2020.02.15
  61. Shang, J., & Wang, J. G.(2021). Research on the Effects of Cross-Level Matching of Knowledge Sharing and Team Organizational Atmosphere on Innovative Behaviors. Journal of Jangsu University of Science and Technology, 21(4), 90-97. DOI:10.16148/j.cnki.cn32-1743/c.2021.04.001
  62. Jiang, W., & Gu, Q. (2017). Leader creativity expectations motivate employee creativity: A moderated mediation examination. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(5), 724-749. DOI:10.1080/09585192.2015.1109535
  63. Wang, L., Fang, L., & Luo, J. L. (2011). Customer knowledge, creativity and innovation behavior in product innovation. Studies in Science of Science, 29(5), 777-784. DOI:10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2011.05.019
  64. Zhou, W. L., Gu, Y. D. & Tang, T. Z.(2020). Influence of R&D personnel's positive emotion on their creative behavior: The mediating effect of self-creativity efficacy and job involvement. Science Research Management, 41(8), 268-276. DOI:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2020.08.028
  65. Abdullah, I., Rozeyta, O. M. A. R., & Panatik, S. A. (2016). A literature review on personality, creativity and innovative behavior. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(1), 177-182.
  66. Shahatha, A. F., & Ahmad, R. (2018). The moderating effect of virtual leadership behaviors towards knowledge sharing in online programming communities. Journal of Information System and Technology Management, 3(7), 97-112.
  67. Chang, Y. Y., Hodgkinson, I., Hughes, P. & Chang, C. Y.(2019). The mediation between participative leadership and employee exploratory innovation: Examining intermediate knowledge mechanisms. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 40(3), 334-355. DOI:10.1108/LODJ-07-2018-0245
  68. Ali, A., Wang, H., & Johnson, R. E. (2020). Empirical analysis of shared leadership promotion and team creativity: An adaptive leadership perspective. Journal of organizational behavior, 41(5), 405-423. DOI:10.1002/job.2437
  69. West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied psychology, 51(3), 355-387. DOI:10.1111/1464-0597.00951
  70. Miao, Q., Newman, A., & Huang, X. (2014). The impact of participative leadership on job performance and organizational citizenship behavior: Distinguishing between the mediating effects of affective and cognitive trust. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(20), 2796-2810. DOI:10.1080/09585192.2014.934890
  71. Lam, C. K., Huang, X., & Chan, S. C. (2015). The threshold effect of participative leadership and the role of leader information sharing. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 836-855. DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.0427
  72. Huang, X., Shi, K., Zhang, Z., & Cheung, Y. L. (2006). The impact of participative leadership behavior on psychological empowerment and organizational commitment in Chinese stateowned enterprises: The moderating role of organizational tenure. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(3), 345-367. DOI:10.1007/s10490-006-9006-3
  73. Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of organizational behavior, 21(3), 249-269. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<249::AID-JOB10>3.0.CO;2-%23
  74. Bock, G. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 15(2), 14-21. DOI:10.4018/irmj.2002040102
  75. Jaiswal, N. K., & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational leadership, innovation climate, creative self-efficacy and employee creativity: A multilevel study. International journal of hospitality management, 51, 30-41. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.07.002
  76. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607. DOI:10.5465/256701
  77. Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. Handbook of structural equation modeling, 361, 379.
  78. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (Vol. 210). John Wiley & Sons.
  79. Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. Psychology Press.
  80. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.
  81. Peterson, R. A., & Kim, Y. (2013). On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. Journal of applied psychology, 98(1), 194. DOI:10.1037/a0030767
  82. Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.
  83. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. DOI:10.1007/bf02310555
  84. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of applied psychology, 78(1), 98. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
  85. Fisher, M. J., & Marshall, A. P. (2009). Understanding descriptive statistics. Australian critical care, 22(2), 93-97. DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2008.11.003
  86. Hardoon, D. R., Szedmak, S., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2004). Canonical correlation analysis: An overview with application to learning methods. Neural computation, 16(12), 2639-2664. DOI:10.1162/0899766042321814
  87. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI:10.1177/002224378101800104
  88. Al-Mashhadani, A. F. S., Ahmad, R., & Yahya, N. I. (2018). Together We Are Stronger: Examining Virtual Leadership Behavior Towards Knowledge Sharing in Online Programming Communities. Knowledge Management International Conference, 180-187.
  89. Chen, L., Wadei, K. A., Bai, S., & Liu, J. (2020). Participative leadership and employee creativity: a sequential mediation model of psychological safety and creative process engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 741-759. DOI:10.1108/LODJ-07-2019-0319
  90. Feng, Y. J., & Xing, Z. C. (2022). The Impact of Safety Incentive on Safety Innovation Behavior: The Roles of Knowledge Sharing and Safety Climate. Soft Science, 36(4), 110-117. DOI:10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2022.04.15
  91. Wang, G. M., Sun, W. Y., Zheng, Q. Q., & Zhao, S. M. (2016). The Effect of Emotional Creativity on Employees' Innovative Behavior: Social Constructivist View of Emotion Perspective. Journal of Psychological Science, 39(1), 124-130. DOI:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20160119
  92. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach.
  93. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  94. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Selfreports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544. DOI:10.1177/014920638601200408
  95. Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., & Chiva, R. (2006). A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European journal of innovation management, 9(4), 333-346 DOI:10.1108/14601060610707812
  96. Zhou, X., Shan, M., & Li, J. (2018). R&D strategy and innovation performance: the role of standardization. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(7), 778-792. DOI:10.1080/09537325.2017.1378319