DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Encountering Peritoneo-Cutaneous Perforators in Microsurgical DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

  • Duncan Loi (Department Surgery, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University) ;
  • Justin L. Easton (Department Surgery, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University) ;
  • Warren M. Rozen (Department Surgery, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University)
  • Received : 2022.07.02
  • Accepted : 2022.12.28
  • Published : 2023.03.15

Abstract

The vascular anatomy of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has been well studied in the planning for autologous breast reconstruction. Preoperative imaging with computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides accurate assessment of this vascular anatomy, which varies widely across patients. Several papers to date have described their encounter with an anomalous "epiperitoneal" or "peritoneo-cutaneous" perforator during flap harvest, a perforator that pierces the posterior rectus sheath from a peritoneal origin, to traverse rectus abdominis and supply the DIEP flap integument. In the course of over 3,000 CTA assessments of the vascular anatomy of the abdominal wall, we have encountered dominant peritoneo-cutaneous perforators in 1% of cases, and smaller perforators seen in many more cases, approaching 5% of cases. With increasing sensitivity of imaging, we also describe a unique case of multiple large bilateral peritoneo-cutaneous perforators, and present these findings in the context of DIEP flap harvest. It is critical to recognize these peritoneo-cutaneous perforators preoperatively to avoid mistaking them for a DIEP during the raising of a DIEP flap. The routine use of preoperative CTA enables the safe identification of individual vascular anatomy, including significant peritoneo-cutaneous perforators.

Keywords

References

  1. Ireton JE, Lakhiani C, Saint-Cyr M. Vascular anatomy of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134(05):810e-821e  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000625
  2. Ohkuma R, Mohan R, Baltodano PA, et al. Abdominally based free flap planning in breast reconstruction with computed tomographic angiography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133(03):483-494  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000438058.44505.d8
  3. Rozen WM, Anavekar NS, Ashton MW, et al. Does the preoperative imaging of perforators with CT angiography improve operative outcomes in breast reconstruction? Microsurgery 2008;28(07):516-523  https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20526
  4. Lasso JM, Sancho M, Campo V, Jimenez E, Perez Cano R. Epiperitoneal vessels: more resources to perform DIEP flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61(07):826-829  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.03.004
  5. Taek Jong L, Sung Chan K, Jin Sup E, et al. Atypical patterns of deep inferior epigastric artery: clinical implication of preoperative CT angiography. J Korean Soc Microsurg 2012;21(01):8-13 
  6. Whitaker IS, Rozen WM, Smit JM, Dimopoulou A, Ashton MW, Acosta R. Peritoneo-cutaneous perforators in deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps: a cadaveric dissection and computed tomographic angiography study. Microsurgery 2009;29(02):124-127  https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20600
  7. Winters HA, Bouman MB, Boom F, Prose LP. The peritoneal free flap: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100(05):1168-1171  https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199710000-00015
  8. Hockel M. The transversus and rectus abdominis musculoperitoneal (TRAMP) composite flap for vulvovaginal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;97(02):455-459  https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199602000-00029
  9. Boyd JB, Taylor GI, Corlett R. The vascular territories of the superior epigastric and the deep inferior epigastric systems. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;73(01):1-16  https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198401000-00001
  10. Stokes RB, Whetzel TP, Sommerhaug E, Saunders CJ. Arterial vascular anatomy of the umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102(03):761-764 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199809010-00021