대한영상의학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology)

  • 제84권6호
  • /
  • Pages.1211-1219
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1738-2637(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-2928(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

전립선 생검: 일반적 고려사항 및 체계적 생검

Prostate Biopsy: General Consideration and Systematic Biopsy

  • 안형우 (분당서울대학교병원 영상의학과)
  • Hyungwoo Ahn (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2023.08.04
  • 심사 : 2023.11.16
  • 발행 : 2023.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

한국은 급속하게 고령화 사회로 진입하고 있으며, 이로 인한 전립선암과 관련된 사회경제적 부담 증가는 불가피하다. 따라서, 전립선암의 조기 발견과 정확한 진단의 필요성은 더욱 높아지고 있다. 일반적으로 이상적인 생검은 최소 숫자의 생검 코어만으로 암을 정확히 찾아낼 수 있어야 한다. 그러나 전립선암은 영상에서 뚜렷한 이상 소견으로 드러나지 않을 수 있기 때문에, 이미지 유도 표적 생검만으로 진단에 충분하지 않다. 따라서 수십 년의 시행착오와 변천을 거쳐, 전립선암 진단은 실질 전반에 대한 무작위적이고 반복적인, 이른바 체계적 생검에 의존하고 있다. 이 종설을 통해 전립선암 진단법의 변천사를 살펴보고, 전립선 생검에 있어 일반적으로 고려해야 할 사항들과 생검 전후의 환자 관리에 대해서 다루고자 한다.

Korea is rapidly entering into an aging society, and an increasing socioeconomic burden related to prostate cancer is inevitable. Therefore, the need for early detection and accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer is becoming increasingly critical. Ideally, a biopsy should accurately detect cancers using a minimum number of cores. However, as prostate cancer is often indistinguishable on imaging, image-guided targeted biopsies alone are insufficient for diagnosis. After decades of trial and error, the diagnosis of prostate cancer relies heavily on systematic biopsy, which is characterized by random and repetitive core acquisition throughout the gland. This review will provide an overview of the historical aspects of prostate cancer diagnosis. Moreover, the review will also address the general considerations involved in prostate biopsy, and discuss the periprocedural management of the patients.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim SH, Kim DH, Kim WS. Long-term care needs of the elderly in Korea and elderly long-term care insurance. Soc Work Public Health 2010;25:176-184
  2. Pak S, Jung KW, Park EH, Ko YH, Won YJ, Joung JY. Incidence and mortality projections for major cancers among Korean men until 2034, with a focus on prostate cancer. Investig Clin Urol 2022;63:175-183
  3. Sathianathen NJ, Konety BR, Crook J, Saad F, Lawrentschuk N. Landmarks in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2018;15:627-642
  4. Patch FS. Practice of urology. Can Med Assoc J 1926;16:1298-1300
  5. Barringer BS. Carcinoma of the Prostate. Ann Surg 1931;93:326-335
  6. Parry WL, Finelli JF. Biopsy of prostate. J Urol 1960;84:643-648
  7. Watanabe H, Igari D, Tanahasi Y, Harada K, Saito M. Development and application of new equipment for transrectal ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1974;2:91-98
  8. Merriel SWD, Pocock L, Gilbert E, Creavin S, Walter FM, Spencer A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients. BMC Med 2022;20:54
  9. Wolf AM, Wender RC, Etzioni RB, Thompson IM, D'Amico AV, Volk RJ, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:70-98
  10. Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R, et al. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 2013;64:876-892
  11. Johnson JR, Polgreen PM, Beekmann SE. Transrectal prostate biopsy-associated prophylaxis and infectious complications: report of a query to the emerging infections network of the infectious diseases society of america. Open Forum Infect Dis 2015;2:ofv002
  12. Lee MS, Moon MH, Kim CK, Park SY, Choi MH, Jung SI; Korean Society of Urogenital Radiology (KSUR). Guidelines for transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: Korean Society of Urogenital Radiology Consensus Statement for patient preparation, standard technique, and biopsy-related pain management. Korean J Radiol 2020;21:422-430
  13. Kim DH, Bae SR, Choi WS, Park HK, Paick SH, Kim HG, et al. The real practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for prostate biopsy in Korea where the prevalence of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli is high. Korean J Urol 2014;55:593-598
  14. Pradere B, Veeratterapillay R, Dimitropoulos K, Yuan Y, Omar MI, MacLennan S, et al. Nonantibiotic strategies for the prevention of infectious complications following prostate biopsy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Urol 2021;205:653-663
  15. Basourakos SP, Alshak MN, Lewicki PJ, Cheng E, Tzeng M, DeRosa AP, et al. Role of prophylactic antibiotics in transperineal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Open Sci 2022;37:53-63
  16. Culkin DJ, Exaire EJ, Green D, Soloway MS, Gross AJ, Desai MR, et al. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in urological practice: ICUD/AUA review paper. J Urol 2014;192:1026-1034
  17. Harvey CJ, Pilcher J, Richenberg J, Patel U, Frauscher F. Applications of transrectal ultrasound in prostate cancer. Br J Radiol 2012;85 Spec No 1:S3-S17
  18. van der Slot MA, Leijte JAP, van der Schoot DKE, Oomens EHGM, Roemeling S. End-fire versus side-fire: a randomized controlled study of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies for prostate cancer detection. Scand J Urol 2020;54:101-104
  19. Obek C, Doganca T, Erdal S, Erdogan S, Durak H. Core length in prostate biopsy: size matters. J Urol 2012; 187:2051-2055
  20. Ergun M, Islamoglu E, YalcInkaya S, Tokgoz H, Savas M. Does length of prostate biopsy cores have an impact on diagnosis of prostate cancer? Turk J Urol 2016;42:130-133
  21. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989;142:71-74; discussion 74-75
  22. Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, Myers L, Bachmann LM, Kleijnen J. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol 2006;175:1605-1612
  23. Kuru TH, Wadhwa K, Chang RT, Echeverria LM, Roethke M, Polson A, et al. Definitions of terms, processes and a minimum dataset for transperineal prostate biopsies: a standardization approach of the Ginsburg study group for enhanced prostate diagnostics. BJU Int 2013;112:568-577
  24. Chang DT, Challacombe B, Lawrentschuk N. Transperineal biopsy of the prostate--is this the future? Nat Rev Urol 2013;10:690-702
  25. Ismail MT, Gomella LG. Transrectal prostate biopsy. Urol Clin North Am 2013;40:457-472
  26. Haas GP, Delongchamps NB, Jones RF, Chandan V, Serio AM, Vickers AJ, et al. Needle biopsies on autopsy prostates: sensitivity of cancer detection based on true prevalence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1484-1489
  27. Borghesi M, Ahmed H, Nam R, Schaeffer E, Schiavina R, Taneja S, et al. Complications after systematic, random, and image-guided prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 2017;71:353-365