The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A 10-year retrospective study on the risk factors affecting the success rate of internal connection implants after prosthetic restoration

내부연결 임플란트의 보철 수복 후 성공률에 미치는 위험요소에 관한 10년간의 후향적 연구

  • Seoin Lee (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Min-Jeong Kim (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 이서인 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김민정 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2023.02.06
  • Accepted : 2023.03.27
  • Published : 2023.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to help increase the success rate by analyzing the types and characteristics of implant prosthesis and the survival rate. Materials and methods. Among implants placed between 2011 and 2020 at Sanbon Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, a case restored by a prosthetic surgeon was investigated for the characteristics and correlation of failure. The causes of failure were classified as failure of osseointegration, peri-implantitis, fixture fracture, abutment fracture, screw fracture, screw loosening, prosthesis fracture, and loss of prosthesis retention. Prosthetic method, cantilever presence, placement location, etc. were analyzed for their correlation with implant failure. Results analysis was derived through Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using SPSS ver 25.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Results. A total of 2587 implants were placed, of which 1141 implants were restored with Single Crown and 1446 implants with Fixed Partial Denture, and the cumulative survival rate was 88.1%. The success rate of SC was 86.2% (984) and the success rate of FPD was 89.6% (1295), showing statistically significant differences, among which factors that had significant differences were abutment fracture, screw fracture, and screw loosening (P < .05). Conclusion. As a result of the 10-year follow-up, more failures occurred due to biomechanical factors than biological factors. Further studies on the success of implants will be needed in the future.

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 임플란트 보철물의 종류 및 특성과 생존율 분석을 통해 성공률을 높이는데 도움이 되는 데에 있다. 대상 및 방법: 원광대학교 치과대학 산본치과병원에서 2011~2020년에 식립한 임플란트 중 한 명의 보철전문의에 의해 수복된 사례에 대하여 그 특성과 실패에 대한 상관관계 등을 조사하였다. 실패의 원인은 골유착 실패, 임플란트주위염, 고정체 파절, 지대주 파절, 나사 파절, 나사 풀림, 보철물 파절, 보철물 유지력 상실 등으로 분류했다. 보철방식, 캔틸레버 여부, 식립 위치 등과 임플란트 실패와의 연관성을 분석했다. 결과 분석은 SPSS ver 25.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA)을 이용하여 Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier 생존분석 등을 통하여 도출했다. 결과: 총 2587개의 임플란트가 식립되었으며, 그 중 1141개의 임플란트가 단일관(Single Crown)으로, 1446개의 임플란트가 고정성 국소의치(Fixed Partial Denture)로 수복되었고 누적생존율은 88.1%이었다. SC의 성공률은 86.2% (984개), FPD의 성공률은 89.6% (1295개)로 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였으며 그 중 유의한 차이가 있었던 요인은 지대주 파절, 나사 파절, 나사 풀림 등이었다 (P < .05). 결론: 10년간의 추적조사 결과 생물학적인 요인보다는 생역학적인 요인으로 인한 실패가 더 많이 발생했고 임플란트의 성공률은 보철방식 별로 상이했으며 영향을 미치는 요인도 상이했다. 추후 임플란트의 성공에 관한 추가적인 연구가 더 필요할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Levin L, Laviv A, Schwartz-Arad D. Long-term success of implants replacing a single molar. J Periodontol 2006;77:1528-32. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.060005
  2. Levin L, Pathael S, Dolev E, Schwartz-Arad D. Aesthetic versus surgical success of single dental implants: 1- to 9-year follow-up. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2005;17:533-8; quiz 540, 566.
  3. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
  4. Greenstein G, Cavallaro J. Failed dental implants: diagnosis, removal and survival of reimplantations. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:835-42. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.2014.28
  5. Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:567-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90081-4
  6. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  7. Wittneben JG, Buser D, Salvi GE, Burgin W, Hicklin S, Bragger U. Complication and failure rates with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and single crowns: a 10-year retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:356-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12066
  8. Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:569-77.
  9. Jemt T, Nilsson M, Olsson M, Stenport VF. Associations between early implant failure, patient age, and patient mortality: a 15-year follow-up study on 2,566 patients treated with implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:189-97. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4933
  10. Manor Y, Oubaid S, Mardinger O, Chaushu G, Nissan J. Characteristics of early versus late implant failure: a retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2649-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.050
  11. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:220-30.
  12. Bragger U, Karoussis I, Persson R, Pjetursson B, Salvi G, Lang N. Technical and biological complications/failures with single crowns and fixed partial dentures on implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:326-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01105.x
  13. Pjetursson BE, Lang NP. Prosthetic treatment planning on the basis of scientific evidence. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:72-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01824.x
  14. Gothberg C, Bergendal T, Magnusson T. Complications after treatment with implant-supported fixed prostheses: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:201-7.
  15. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9
  16. Moheng P, Feryn JM. Clinical and biologic factors related to oral implant failure: a 2-year follow-up study. Implant Dent 2005;14:281-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000173626.00889.15
  17. Busenlechner D, Furhauser R, Haas R, Watzek G, Mailath G, Pommer B. Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2014;44:102-8. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2014.44.3.102
  18. Muley N, Prithviraj DR, Gupta V. Evolution of external and internal implant to abutment connection. Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res 2012;3:122-9. https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-Journals-10012-1079
  19. Prithviraj DR, Muley N, Gupta V. The evolution of external and internal implant-abutment connections: A review. International Dental Research 2012;2:37-42. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2012.vol2.no2.3
  20. Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Bonfante EA, Santiago Junior JF, Pellizzer EP. Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2018;70:14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.001
  21. Yi Y, Koak JY, Kim SK, Lee SJ, Heo SJ. Comparison of implant component fractures in external and internal type: A 12-year retrospective study. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:155-62. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.155
  22. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:9-17.
  23. Howe MS, Keys W, Richards D. Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: A systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis. J Dent 2019;84:9-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.008
  24. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Linden U, Bergstrom C, van Steenberghe D. Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:639-45.
  25. Kapoor R, Singh K, Kaur S, Arora A. Retention of implant supported metal crowns cemented with different luting agents: a comparative invitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:ZC61-4. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/15912.7635
  26. Misch CE. Consideration of biomechanical stress in treatment with dental implants. Dent Today 2006;25: 80, 82, 84-5; quiz 85.
  27. Bidez MW, Misch CE. Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:264-74.
  28. Abou-Ayash S, Strasding M, Rucker G, Att W. Impact of prosthetic material on mid- and long-term outcome of dental implants supporting single crowns and fixed partial dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017;10:47-65.
  29. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:493-502.
  30. Bryant SR. The effects of age, jaw site, and bone condition on oral implant outcomes. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:470-90.
  31. Levin L, Ofec R, Grossmann Y, Anner R. Periodontal disease as a risk for dental implant failure over time: a long-term historical cohort study. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:732-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01745.x
  32. Jemt T. Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A five-year follow-up report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:142-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050304.x
  33. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-6.
  34. Misch CE, Bidez MW. Implant-protected occlusion: a biomechanical rationale. Compendium 1994;15:1330, 1332, 1334 passim; quiz 1344.
  35. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, Felton DA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:633-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90442-4
  36. Soliman TA, Tamam RA, Yousief SA, El-Anwar MI. Assessment of stress distribution around implant fixture with three different crown materials. Tanta Dent J 2015;12:249-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tdj.2015.08.001
  37. Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, Konvickova S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:20-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.008
  38. Chuang SK, Tian L, Wei LJ, Dodson TB. Kaplan-Meier analysis of dental implant survival: a strategy for estimating survival with clustered observations. J Dent Res 2001;80:2016-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800111301
  39. Lin CL, Wang JC, Chang WJ. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:107-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01363.x
  40. Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, Ohyama T. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:234-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.12.017
  41. Simonis P, Dufour T, Tenenbaum H. Long-term implant survival and success: a 10-16-year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:772-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01912.x