DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Obstacle Crossing Training for Improving Balance and Walking Functions After Stroke: Randomized Controlled Trial of Unaffected Limb Leads Versus Affected Limb Leads

  • Gi-Seon Ryu (Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Center, Top Hospital) ;
  • Joon-Hee Lee (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Medical Science, Cheongju University) ;
  • Duck-Won Oh (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Medical Science, Cheongju University)
  • 투고 : 2023.03.14
  • 심사 : 2023.04.11
  • 발행 : 2023.04.30

초록

Purpose: Obstacle crossing training is being used to improve the walking ability of stroke patients, but studies on which method is more effective when performing obstacle crossing training with an unaffected limb lead (OCT-ULL) and an affected limb lead (OCT-ALL) are not well known. As such, this study aims to compare the intervention effects of obstacle crossing training using unaffected limb leads (OCT-ULL) and obstacle crossing training using affected limb leads (OCT-ALL). Methods: In total, 25 patients with chronic stroke were studied and assigned randomly to the obstacle crossing training with unaffected limb leads (OCT-ULL) group or the obstacle crossing training with affected limb leads (OCT-ALL) group. A lower extremity strength test, balance and gait test, and fall efficacy test were conducted as preliminary tests, and all patients participated in the intervention for 30 minutes a day, five days a week for four weeks, and the same preliminary tests were conducted post-intervention. Results: Compared with the OCT-ALL group, the OCT-ULL group showed a significant improvement in the strength of the affected hip abductor muscle and in balance and gait, as well as in fall efficacy (p<.05). Conclusion: This study suggested that applying the OCT-ULL training method in the obstacle crossing training of stroke patients is more effective for improving balance and gait functions than OCT-ALL.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. An SH, Jee YJ, Shin HH, et al. Validity of the original and short versions of the dynamic gait index in predicting falls in stroke survivors. Rehabilitation Nursing Journal. 2016:42(6):325-332. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnj.280
  2. Batchelor FA, Hill KD, Mackintosh SF, et al. Whitehead CH. Effects of a multifactorial falls prevention program for people with stroke returning home after rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2012:93(9):1648-1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.031
  3. Chan PP, Tou JIS, Mimi MT, et al. Reliability and validity of the timed up and go test with a motor task in people with chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2017:98(11):2213-2220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.008
  4. Chou LS, Kaufman KR, Brey RH, et al. Motion of the whole body's center of mass when stepping over obstacles of different heights. Gait & Posture. 2001:13(1):17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(00)00087-4
  5. Denkinger MD, Igl W, Lukas A, et al. Relationship between fear of falling and outcomes of an inpatient geriatric rehabilitation population-fear of the fear of falling. Journal of the American Geriatrics society. 2010:58(4):664-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02759.x
  6. Dubey L, Karthikbabu S, Mohan D. Effects of pelvic stability training on movement control, hip muscles strength, walking speed and daily activities after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Annals of Neurosciences. 2018:25(2):80-89. https://doi.org/10.1159/000486273
  7. Frigotto MF, Cardoso CA, Santos RR dos, et al. Gluteus Medius and Tensor Fascia Latae muscle activation levels during multi-joint strengthening exercises. Motriz Rio Claro. 2019:25(3).
  8. Fujisawa H, Takeda R. A new clinical test of dynamic standing balance in the frontal plane: the side-step test. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2006:20(4):340-346. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215506cr949oa
  9. Iyigun G. The Importance of Obstacle Crossing Task and Considerations After Stroke: A Review of the Literature. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2019:2(1):1-6.
  10. Jeong YG, Koo JW. The effects of treadmill walking combined with obstacle-crossing on walking ability in ambulatory patients after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2016:23(6):406-412. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2016.1168592
  11. Karthikbabu S, Chakrapani M. Hand-held dynamometer is a reliable tool to measure trunk muscle strength in chronic stroke. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research. 2017:11(9):YC09.
  12. Kim HS (2015). The effect of the type of tread plate on muscle activity and balance of trunk and leg muscles during step training in chronic stroke patients. Daegu University.
  13. Lu TW, Yen HC, Chen HL, et al. Symmetrical kinematic changes in highly functioning older patients post-stroke during obstacle-crossing. Gait & Posture. 2010:31(4):511-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.02.012
  14. Muroi D, Ohtera S, Kataoka Y, et al. Obstacle avoidance training for individuals with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019:9(12):e028873.
  15. Park KT, Kim HJ. Effect of the circuit training program using obstacles on the walking and balance abilities of stroke patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2016:28(4):1194-1198. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.1194
  16. Punt M, Bruijn SM, Wittink H, et al. Virtual obstacle crossing: reliability and differences in stroke survivors who prospectively experienced falls or no falls. Gait & Posture. 2017:58:533-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.09.013
  17. Robinson CA, Shumway-Cook A, Ciol MA, et al. Participation in community walking following stroke: subjective versus objective measures and the impact of personal factors. Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal. 2011:91(12):1865-1876.
  18. Roos MA, Reisman DS, Hicks GE, et al. Dev elopment of the Modified Four Square Step Test and its reliability and validity in people with stroke. Journal of rehabilitation Research & Development. 2016:53(3):403.
  19. Said CM, Galea M, Lythgo N. Obstacle crossing following stroke improves over one month when the unaffected limb leads, but not when the affected limb leads. Gait & Posture. 2014:39(1):213-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.07.008
  20. Said CM, Galea MP, Lythgo N. People with stroke who fail an obstacle crossing task have a higher incidence of falls and utilize different gait patterns compared with people who pass the task. Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal. 2013:93(3):334-344.
  21. Said CM, Goldie PA, Patla AE, et al. Effect of stroke on step characteristics of obstacle crossing. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2001:82(12):1712-1719. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.26247
  22. Sakuma K, Ohata K, Izumi K, et al. Relation between abnormal synergy and gait in patients after stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2014:11(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-1
  23. Shumway-Cook A, Matsuda PN, Taylor C. Investigating the validity of the environmental framework underlying the original and modified dynamic gait index. Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal. 2015:95(6):864-870.
  24. van der Krogt MM, Delp SL, Schwartz MH. How robust is human gait to muscle weakness? Gait & Posture. 2012:36(1):113-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.01.017
  25. Walsh M, Galvin R, Horgan NF. Fall-related experiences of stroke survivors: a meta-ethnography. Disabilty and Rehabilitation. 2017:39(7):631-640. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1160445