Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison of Engineering Students' Learning Performance in Introductory Statistics of Traditional and Real-time Online Class Types

통계학 개론 대면과 실시간 비대면수업에서 공학전공 학생들의 학습 성취도에 대한 비교 연구

  • Choi, Kyungmee (College of Science and Technology, Hongik University)
  • 최경미 (홍익대학교 과학기술대학)
  • Received : 2023.02.22
  • Accepted : 2023.04.10
  • Published : 2023.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We compare engineering students' learning performance in introductory Statistics classes of the two class types, traditional in-classroom classes with a few reports and real-time online classes with quizzes. Rates of missing classes and turning in homeworks are also included to explain learning attitude. Scores of quizzes, midterm test and final test are used to assess performance. Upto the midterm, the class type is not significant, but rates of missing classes and turning in homeworks are significant. Since the midterm, in-classroom class type reveals better final performance than real-time online class type, rate of turning in homeworks is significant, but rate of missing classes is not significant.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2022학년도 홍익대학교 학술연구진흥비에 의하여 지원되었음.

References

  1. 김태수･김병수(2008). 대학수학의 수준별 수업에 따른 학업 성취도 분석. 수학교육논문지, 22(3), 369-383.
  2. 박승빈･서혜영･문원석(1999). 공학교육에서의 웹 기반 학습과 교수방법. 공학교육과 기술, 6(1), 9-12.
  3. 서보억(2021). 수학교과교육학 및 교과내용학 강좌의 대면 및 비대면 운영 결과 비교 분석. 과학교육연구지, 45(2), 257-273. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2021.45.2.257
  4. 송수연･김한경(2020). 언택트 시대의 대학교육: 코로나19에 따른 비대면 강의 만족도와 수강지속 의사에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 아시아교육연구, 21(4), 1099-1126.
  5. 신정철･정지선･신택수(2008). 대학생의 학업성취도와 그 영향 요인들 간의 인과관계 분석. 교육행정학연구, 26(1), 7-313.
  6. 이춘호(2003). 공학교육에서의 수학에 관하여. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E. 수학교육논문집, 223-234.
  7. 이한샘･서은희(2021). 대학의 원격화상수업과 대면수업의 만족도 비교 연구. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 21(7), 440-447. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.07.440
  8. 최경미 외(2007). 중위권 대학 신입생의 수학적 배경과 대학 수학 성취도 사이의 관계. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A. 수학교육, 46(1), 53-67.
  9. 최경미(2014). 미적부학 복습시험을 포함하는 공업수학 수업 모형 연구. 공학교육연구, 17(2), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2014.17.2.3
  10. 최윤희 외(2022). 비대면 강의에서 학습양식유형과 강의태도가 학업성취도에 미치는 영향. 공학교육연구, 25(2), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2022.25.2.22
  11. 황혜연(2021). 대면수업과 비대면수업에서 만족도에 영향을 미치는 요인. 교육종합연구, 19(2), 59-80.
  12. Casella G, & Berger R. B.(2001). Statistical Inference. 2nd ed. Duxbury Press; 2001.
  13. Brown, S. W. & Kulikowich, J. M.(2004). Teaching Statistics From a Distance: What Have We Learned? International Journal of Instructional Media, 31, 19-37.
  14. Franklin, C. & Garfield, J.(2006). "The GAISE Project: Developing Statistics Education Guidelines for Pre-K-12 and College Courses," in Thinking and Reasoning with Data and Chance: 2006 NCTM Yearbook, ed. G. Burrill, Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, p. 435-475.
  15. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, & Friedman J.(2017). The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd ed. Springer.
  16. Hogg, R. & Tanis, E.(1988). Probability and Statistical Inference, 3rd ed. Macmillan Publishing Company.
  17. James G. et al.(2021). An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Application in R, 2nd ed. Springer.
  18. Johnson, H.D. et al.(2009). Internet Approach versus Lecture and Lab-Based Approach for Teaching an Introductory Statistical Methods Course: Students' Opinions. Teaching Statistics, 31, 21-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9639.2009.00335.x
  19. Kartha, C. P.(2006). Learning Business Statistics: Online vs Traditional. The Business Review, 5, 27-32.
  20. Lin, T.C.(2022). Student learnig performance and satisfaction with traditional face-to-face classroom versus online learning: Evidence from teaching statistics for Business. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/204275302110596
  21. Mills, J. D. & Raju D.(2011). Teaching Statistics Online: A Decade's Review of the Literature About What Works. Journal of Statistics Education, 19(2). DOI:10.1080/10691898.2011.11889613
  22. Rice J. A.(2007). Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Cengage Learning.
  23. R Core Team(2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org
  24. Speed, M. F. & Hardin, J.(2001). Teaching Statistics Via Distance: Duplicating the Classroom Experience. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 30, 391-402. https://doi.org/10.1081/SAC-100002374
  25. Suanpang, P., Petocz, P., & Kalceff, W.(2004). Students Attitudes to Learning Business Statistics: Comparison of Online and Traditional Methods. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 9-20.
  26. Summers, J.J., Waigandt, A., & Whittaker, T. A.(2005). A Comparison of Student Achievement and Satisfaction in an Online Versus a Traditional Face-to-Face Statistics Class. Innovative Higher Education, 29, 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-005-1938-x
  27. Utts, J. et al.(2003). A Study Comparing Traditional and Hybrid Internet-Based Instruction in Introductory Statistics Classes. Journal of Statistics Education [online], 11, 3.
  28. Ward, B.(2004). The Best of Both Worlds: A Hybrid Statistics Course. Journal of Statistics Education [online], 12, 3.
  29. Wu, J. Y. & Nian M. W.(2021). The dynamics of an online learning community in a hybrid statistics classroom over time: Implications for the question-oriented problem-solving course design with the social network analysis approach. Computers & Education, 166, 104120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104120
  30. Zhang, J.(2002). Teaching Statistics On-line: Our Experiences and Thoughts. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.