An Ethical Consideration on the Standard Operating Procedure Operation Status and the Ethical Review of the Vulnerable Research Subjects of Institutional Review Board, a Medical Institution in Korea

우리나라 의료기관 Institutional Review Board의 취약한 연구 대상자 관련 표준운영지침서 운영 현황과 윤리적 고찰

  • Eun Hwa Byun (Human Research Protection Center (QA), Seoul National University of Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Byung In Choe (Department of Institutional Review and Research Ethics, Nicholas Cardinal Cheong Graduate School for Life, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 변은화 (분당서울대학교병원 임상연구윤리센터 QA실) ;
  • 최병인 (가톨릭대학교 생명대학원 임상연구윤리학과 )
  • Received : 2022.02.06
  • Accepted : 2023.02.24
  • Published : 2023.02.28

Abstract

Purspose: The purpose of this study is to examine the meaning and definition of vulnerable subjects in clinical trials in light of domestic and international regulations and guidelines, to analyze the contents of standard operation procedures (SOPs) among advanced general hospitals in Korea that conduct clinical trials, and to examine deliberation procedures for operation plans. Methods: The study examined how vulnerable research subjects were defined and described in related regulations and the classification of vulnerable research subjects presented in the IRB/HRPP SOPs of 18 clinical trial institutions, including 11 AAHRPP-accreditated general hospitals in Korea, as well as the operation of the IRB deliberation. Results: Among all domestic and international regulations and guidelines, only the The Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) guidelines explain why vulnerability is related to judgments on the severity of physical, psychological, and social harm, why individuals are vulnerable, and for what reasons. However, the classification of vulnerable subjects by institutions differed from the classification by the International Conference on Harmonization-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP). A total of the 16 institutions classified children and minors as vulnerable research subjects. 14 institutions classified subjects who cannot consent freely were classified as vulnerable subjects. 15 institutions classified sujects who can be affected by the organizational hierarchy were classified as vulnerable subjects. Subjects in emergency situations were regarded as vulnerable research subjects in 8 of institutions, while people in wards, patients with incurable diseases, and the economically poor including the unemployed were categorized as vulnerable research subjects in 7, 4, and 4 of institutions, respectively. Additionally, some research subjects were not classified as vulnerable by ICH-GCP but were classified as vulnerable by domestic institutions 15 of the institutions classified pregnant women and fetuses as vulnerable, 11 classified the elderly as vulnerable, and 6 classified foreigners as vulnerable. Conclution: The regulations and institutional SOPs classify subjects differently, which may affect subject protection. There is a need to improve IRBs' classifications of vulnerable research subjects. It is also necessary to establish the standards according to the differences in deliberation processes. Further, it is recommended to maintain a consistent review of validity, assessment of risk/benefit, and a review using checklists and spokeperson. The review of IRB is to be carried out in a manner that respects human dignity by taking into account the physical, psychological, and social conditions of the subjects.

Keywords

References

  1. Enforcement Rules: Life Ethics and Safety Act of 2021, Article 2 (Scope of Human Research) [Internet]. Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2022 Dec [cited 2022 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?menuId=1&dt=20201211&query=%EC%83%9D%EB%AA%85%EC%9C%A4%EB%A6%AC+%EB%B0%8F+%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%EC%97%90+%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C+%EB%B2%95%EB%A5%A0&subMenuId=15#undefined.
  2. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. ICH Korean version of Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2) [Internet]. Cheongju (Korea): Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2017 [cited 2022 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.nifds.go.kr/brd/m_105/list.do?page=2&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=&srchTp=&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&multi_itm_seq=0&company_cd=&company_nm=.
  3. Bae H. Re-conceptualization of vulnerability in clinical trials and the role of Institutional Review Board. Korean J Med Ethics 2011;14:55-77. https://doi.org/10.35301/ksme.2011.14.1.55
  4. Yoo SJ, Choi SB, Kim EA. Necessity and directions of changing approach to vulnerability in research involving humans. J Korean Bioethics Assoc 2020;21:1-24. https://doi.org/10.37305/JKBA.2020.06.21.1.1
  5. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Standard Operation Procedures of the Bioethics Committee of Public Institutions, Version 5.3 [Internet]. Cheongju (Korea): Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2022 Mar [cited 2023 Feb 24]. Available from: https://www.irb.or.kr/menu04/ReferenceView.aspx?page=1&id=760.
  6. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Reflet, rights and protection of clinical trial subjects, Article 5 [Internet]. Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2021 Apr [cited 2023 Feb 24]. Available from: https://nedrug.mfds.go.kr/bbs/38/107/.
  7. Korea National Institute Bioethics Policy. Guidelines for protection of vulnerable research subjects [Internet]. Seoul (Korea): Korea National Institute of Bioethics Policy, Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2019 July [cited 2023 Feb 24]. Available from: https://www.irb.or.kr/menu04/ReferenceView.aspx?id=645.
  8. Notice. The 4th period (2021-2023) designated 45 upper-level general hospitals. The 4th period (2021-2023) designated 45 upper-level general hospitals. [Internet]. Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2020 Dec [cited 2022 Oct 25]. Available from: https://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&CONT_SEQ=362710
  9. Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Program, Inc. Find an Accreditation Organization [Internet]. Washington, DC; AAHRPP; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: http://www.aahrpp.org/find-an-accredited-organization.
  10. Regulation: Life Ethics and Safety Act of 2020, Article 3 (basic principles) [Internet]. Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2020 Dec [cited 2022 Dec 25]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?menuId=1&dt=20201211&query=%EC%83%9D%EB%AA%85%EC%9C%A4%EB%A6%AC+%EB%B0%8F+%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%EC%97%90+%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C+%EB%B2%95%EB%A5%A0&subMenuId=15#undefined.
  11. Regulation: Life Ethics and Safety Act of 2020, Article 10 (Organization and operation of IRB, etc.) [Internet]. Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2020 Dec [cited 2022 Dec 25]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?menuId=1&dt=20201211&query=%EC%83%9D%EB%AA%85%EC%9C%A4%EB%A6%AC+%EB%B0%8F+%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%EC%97%90+%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C+%EB%B2%95%EB%A5%A0&subMenuId=15#undefined.
  12. Enforcement Rules: Life Ethics and Safety Act of 2021, Article 2 (A Study on Human Subjects Exempting Deliberation by the Institutional Review Board) [Internet]. Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2022 Dec [cited 2022 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?menuId=1&dt=20201211&query=%EC%83%9D%EB%AA%85%EC%9C%A4%EB%A6%AC+%EB%B0%8F+%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%EC%97%90+%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C+%EB%B2%95%EB%A5%A0&subMenuId=15#undefined.
  13. Rules concerning the safety of medicines, etc.: Korea Good Clinical Practice of 2022, Article 6 (Institutional Review Board) [Internet]. Cheongju (Korea): Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2022 Jan [cited 2022 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?menuId=1&subMenuId=17&tabMenuId=93&query=%EC%9D%98%EC%95%BD%ED%92%88%EB%93%B1%EC%9D%98%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%EC%97%90%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C#J14261863.
  14. US Common Rule 45 CFR 46.111. Criteria for IRB approval of research. (a) In order to approve research covered by this policy the IRB shall determine that all of the following requirements are satisfied... [Internet]. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register; [cited 2022 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-A/part-46/subpart-A/section-46.111.
  15. US Common Rule 45 CFR 46.111. Criteria for IRB approval of research. (b) When some or all of the subjects are likely to be vulnerable to coercion or undue influence,... [Internet]. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register; [cited 2022 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-A/part-46/subpart-A/section-46.111.
  16. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and BehavioralResearch. The Belmont Report. Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. April 1979. Part B, Respertor for persons
  17. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subject, June 1964, No.19 [Internet]. Ferney-Voltaire, France; World Medical Association; 2008 [cited 2022 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/DoH-Oct2008.pdf.
  18. CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences). International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans. Geneva (Switzerland): CIOMS; 2016. p. 61-3.
  19. Regulation: Pharmaceutical Affairs Act of 2022, Article 34-2 (Designation, etc. of institutions conducting clinical trials, etc.) [Internet]. Cheongju (Korea): Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2022 June [cited 2022 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?dt=20201211&subMenuId=15&menuId=1&query=%EC%95%BD%EC%82%AC%EB%B2%95#undefined.
  20. Regulation: Life Ethics and Safety Act of 2020, Article 16 (Consent of Human Research) [Internet]. Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2020 Dec [cited 2022 Dec 25]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?menuId=1&dt=20201211&query=%EC%83%9D%EB%AA%85%EC%9C%A4%EB%A6%AC+%EB%B0%8F+%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%EC%97%90+%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C+%EB%B2%95%EB%A5%A0&subMenuId=15#undefined.
  21. Rules concerning the safety of medicines, etc. : Korea Good Clinical Practice of 2022, Article 7 (Principle Investigator) [Internet]. Cheongju (Korea): Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2022 Jan [cited 2022 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?menuId=1&subMenuId=17&tabMenuId=93&query=%EC%9D%98%EC%95%BD%ED%92%88%EB%93%B1%EC%9D%98%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%EC%97%90%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C#J14261863.
  22. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. National Institute of Korean Language Standard Korean Dictionary [Internet]. Sejong (Korea): National Institute of Korean Language Standard Korean Dictionary; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 25]. Available from: https://stdict.korean.go.kr/search/searchView.do.