DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sexual Dimorphism and Morphological Characteristics of Pipistrellus abramus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in Korea

한국산 집박쥐의 성적 이형 및 형태학적 특징에 관한 연구

  • 김성철 (동국대학교 생명과학과) ;
  • 전영신 (동국대학교 생명과학과) ;
  • 정철운 (동국대학교 생명과학과)
  • Received : 2023.03.28
  • Accepted : 2023.04.10
  • Published : 2023.04.30

Abstract

Seventy Pipistrellus abramus samples were caught to analyze their sexual dimorphism and mophological characteristics. The mean HB and FA were 50.86 mm and 34.93 mm, respectively, based on external measurements and skull shape. The length of the TL, Hfcu, and Tra were approximately 70%, 55.6%, and 38% of the HB, Tib, and E, respectively. Both the lambdoid crest and the sagittal crest were well developed and the H.BC was approximately 84% of the W.BC. P2 was inside the toothrow and metacone of canine was clearly visible. According to the analysis of sexual dimorphism, the following characteristics were different in between males and females: WS, C-M3, C-C, M3-M3, LOM, LUC, and i-m3. The WS, C-M3, C-C, M3-M3, LOM, and i-m3 were bigger in females than males, whereas the LUC was bigger in males.

Keywords

References

  1. Anthony, E. L. P., 1988, Age determination in bats, in: Kunz, T. H. (ed.), Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats, Washington DC: Smithsonian Institute Press, 533.
  2. Barlow, K. E., Jones, G., Barratt, E. M., 1997, Can skull morphology be used to predict ecological relationships between bat species? A test using two cryptic species of pipistrelle, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B264, 1695-1700. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0235
  3. Briggs, B., King, D., 1998, The Bat Detective: A Field Guide for Bat Detection, Stag Electronics, 14-35.
  4. Campbell, P., Schneider, C. J., Zubaid, A., Adnan, A. M., Kunz, T. H., 2007, Morphological and ecological correlates of coexistence in malaysian fruit bats (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae), J. Mamm., 88, 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-160R1.1
  5. Chung, C. U., 2020, A Field guide to korean bats, Econature Press, Korea, 1-272.
  6. Chung, C. U., Han, S. H., Kim, S. C., Lee, C. I., 2009, Echolocation signals of Pipistrellus abramus in relation to environmental type, Kor. J. Env. Eco., 23, 553-563.
  7. Chung, C. U., Han, S. H., Kim, S. C., Lee, H. J., 2014, External morphology and ultrasound characteristics of the Ussurian tube-nosed bat (Murina Ussuriensis), J. Env. Sci. Int., 23, 521-525. https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2014.23.3.521
  8. Chung, C. U., Han, S. H., Lee, C. I., 2010, Home-range analysis of Pipistrelle Bat (Pipistrellus abramus) in non-reproductive season by using radio-tracking, Kor. J. Env. Eco., 24, 487-492.
  9. Chung, C. U., Kim, S. C., Han, S. H., 2013, Diurnal roosts selection and home range size in the Myotis aurascens (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) inhabiting a rural area, J. Env. Sci. Int., 22, 1227-1234. https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2013.22.9.1227
  10. Herreid, C. F., 1959, Sexual dimorphism in teeth of the Free-Tailed Bat, J. Mamm., 40, 538-541. https://doi.org/10.2307/1376271
  11. Imaizumi, Y., 1955, Systematic notes on the Korean and Japanese bats of Pipistellus savi group, Bull. Nat. Sci. Mus., 2, 54-63.
  12. Jeon, Y. S., Kim, S. C., Han, S. H., Chung, C. U., 2018, Characteristics of the home range and habitat use of the Greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) in an urban landscape, J. Env. Sci. Int., 27, 665-675. https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2018.27.8.665
  13. Kunz, T. H., Kurta, A., 1988, Capture methods and holding devices, in: Kunz, T. H. (ed), Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., 533.
  14. Kuroda, N., 1939, Distribution of mammals in the japanese empire, J. Mamm., 20, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1374490
  15. Menzel, M. A., Menzel, J. M., Castleberry, S. B., Ozier, J., Ford, W. M., Edwards, J. W., 2002, Illustrated key to skins and skulls of bats in the southeastern and mid-atlantic states, USDA Forest Service, 3-6.
  16. Mitchell-Jones, A. J., McLeish, A. P., 2004, Bat worker's manual, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 22-131.
  17. Mori, T., 1928, Four new species of bats (Vespertilionidae) from Korea, Anot. Zool. Jap., 11, 389-395.
  18. Ognev, S. I., 1927, A synopsis of the Russian bats, J. Mamm., 8, 140-157. https://doi.org/10.2307/1373648
  19. Palmeirim, J. M., 1998, Analysis of skull measurements and measurers: Can we use data obtained by various observers?, J. Mamm., 79, 1021-1028. https://doi.org/10.2307/1383111
  20. Popove, V. V., Ivanova, T. I., 2002, Comparative craniometrical analysis and distributional patterns of medium-size horseshoe bats (Chiroptera: Rainolophidae) in Bulgaria, Folia Zool., 51, 187-200.
  21. Yoon, M. H., Han, S. H., Oh, H. S., Kim, J. G., 2004, The mammals of Korea, Dongbangmedia, Seoul, 36-94.
  22. Yoon, M. H., Son, S. W., 1989, Studies on taxonomy and phylogeny of bats inhabiting Korea 1. Taxonomical review of one Rhinolophid and six Vespertilionid bats and the Korean Microchiropteran faunal succession, Korean J. Zool., 32, 374-392.
  23. Yoshiyuki, M., 1985, A Systematic study of the Japanese Chiroptera, Ph. D. Dissertation, Kyushu University, Kyushu, Japan.