DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A preliminary study on laryngeal and supralaryngeal articulatory distinction of the three-way contrast of Korean velar stops

  • Jiyeon Song (Hanyang Institute for Phonetics and Cognitive Sciences of Language, Hanyang University) ;
  • Sahyang Kim (Department of English Education, Hongik University) ;
  • Taehong Cho (Hanyang Institute for Phonetics and Cognitive Sciences of Language, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2023.02.15
  • 심사 : 2023.03.20
  • 발행 : 2023.03.31

초록

This study investigated acoustic (VOT) and articulatory characteristics of Korean velar stops in monosyllabic CV structures to examine how the three-way distinction is realized in the laryngeal and supralaryngeal domains and how the distinction is manifested in male versus female speakers' speech production. EMA data were collected from 22 speakers. In line with previous studies, male speakers preserved the three-way differentiation of velar stops (/k*/</k/</kh/) in terms of VOT while female speakers showed only a two-way distinction (/k*/</k/=/kh/). As for the kinematic characteristics, a clear three-way distinction was found only in male speakers' peak velocity measure in the C-to-V opening movement (/kh/</k/</k*/). For the other kinematic measures (i.e., articulatory closure duration, deceleration duration of the opening movement and the entire opening movement duration), male speakers showed only a two-way distinction between fortis and the other two stops. Female speakers did not show a three-way contrast in any kinematic measure. They showed a two-way distinction between lenis and the other two stops in C-to-V deceleration duration (/k*/=/kh/</k/), and a two-way distinction between fortis and lenis stops in the opening movement duration. An overall comparison of VOT and articulatory analyses revealed that the lenis-aspirated kinematic distinction is diminishing, driven by female speakers, in line with the loss of the lenis-aspirated distinction in VOT that could influence supralaryngeal articulation.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021S1A5C2A02086884).

참고문헌

  1. Bang, H. Y., Sonderegger, M., Kang, Y., Clayards, M., & Yoon, T. J. (2018). The emergence, progress, and impact of sound change in progress in Seoul Korean: Implications for mechanisms of tonogenesis. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 120-144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.09.005
  2. Bates, D., Machler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. 
  3. Brunner, J., Fuchs, S., & Perrier, P. (2011). Supralaryngeal control in Korean velar stops. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 178-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.01.003
  4. Cho, T. (1996). Vowel correlates to consonant phonation: An acoustic-perceptual study of Korean obstruents (Master's thesis). University of Texas, Arlington, TX. 
  5. Cho, T., Jun, S. A., & Ladefoged, P. (2002). Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics, 30(2), 193-228.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0153
  6. Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P. (1999). Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27(2), 207-229.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0094
  7. Cho, T., Son, M., & Kim, S. (2016). Articulatory reflexes of the three-way contrast in labial stops and kinematic evidence for domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of the Inter- national Phonetic Association, 46(2), 129-155.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100315000481
  8. Choi, J., Kim, S., & Cho, T. (2020). An apparent-time study of an ongoing sound change in Seoul Korean: A prosodic account. PLOS ONE, 15(10), e0240682. 
  9. Kang, Y. (2014). Voice onset time merger and development of tonal contrast in Seoul Korean stops: A corpus study. Journal of Phonetics, 45, 76-90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.03.005
  10. Kim, M. R. (2013, June). Interspeaker variation on VOT merger and shortening in Seoul Korean. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA2013 (p. 060212). Acoustical Society of America. 
  11. Ladefoged, P., & Cho, T. (2001). Linking linguistic contrasts to reality: The case of VOT. In N. Gronnum, & J. Rischel (Eds.), Travaux Du Cercle Linguistique De Copenhague vol. XXXI (pp. 212-225). Copenhagen, Denmark: C.A. Reitzel. 
  12. Lenth, R. V. (2022). Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means [R package emmeans version 1.8.3]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans 
  13. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384-422.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
  14. Maddieson, I. (1997). Phonetic universals. In J. Laver, & W. J. Hardcastle (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 619-639). Oxford: Blackwell. 
  15. R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/ 
  16. Silva, D. J. (2006). Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology, 23(2), 287-308.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675706000911
  17. The Hanyang Institute for Phonetics and Cognitive Sciences of Language (HIPCS). (2022). Dynamics of speech production through articulatory DB construction.