DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Piezoelectric Properties of PMN-PNN-PZT Ceramics and the Simulation of Ultrasonic Cleaner

  • Sujin Kang (Department of Electrical Engineering, Semyung University) ;
  • Ju Hyun Yoo (Department of Electrical Engineering, Semyung University) ;
  • Sun A Whang (Department of Nursing, Semyung University) ;
  • Jae Gyu Lee (Department of Electrical Engineering, Semyung University) ;
  • Jong Hyeon Lee (Department of Electrical Engineering, Semyung University) ;
  • Ji Hoon Lee (Department of Nursing, Semyung University) ;
  • Dae Yeol Hwang (Department of Nursing, Semyung University) ;
  • Sua Kim (Department of Nursing, Semyung University) ;
  • Seong Min Lee (Department of Nursing, Semyung University) ;
  • Han Byeol Kim (Department of Nursing, Semyung University)
  • Received : 2022.12.05
  • Accepted : 2022.12.19
  • Published : 2023.03.01

Abstract

In this paper, for the application of ultrasonic cleaners for cleaning dentures and transparent braces, Pb(Mn1/3Nb2/3)O3-Pb(Ni1/3 Nb2/3)O3-Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 [PMN-PNN-PZT] system ceramics were manufactured and their dielectric and piezoelectric properties were investigated. Overall the best properties suitable for the device applications such as ultrasonic cleaner were obtained from the ceramics sintered at 920℃: bulk density of 7.8 g/cm3, the dielectric constant (εr) of 1,689, piezoelectric charge constant (d33) of 433 pC/N, planar electromechanical coupling factor (kp) of 0.64, mechanical quality factor (Qm) of 835, S11E of 13.37 (10-12 N/m2), and Curie temperature of 315℃ By using the physical properties of this composition, the ultrasonic cleaner was designed and simulated using the commercial ATILA software. For the three-layered ceramics with the dimension of 25 mm × 25 mm × 2.5mm, an excellent displacement of 8.998 10-3 m) and the sound pressure of 147.68 dB were recorded.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by Semyung University's University Innovation Support Project in 2022.

References

  1. H. S. Kim, J. H. Ahn, and R. L. Boyd, Korean J. Orthod., 33, 21 (2003). 
  2. A. Papadimitriou, S. Mousoulea, N. Gkantidis, and D. Kloukos, Prog. Orthod., 19, 37 (2018). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0235-z] 
  3. R. A. Islam and S. Priya, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 89, 3147 (2006). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01205.x] 
  4. H. W. Kim, A. Batra, S. Priya, K. Uchino, D. Markley, R. E. Newnham, and H. F. Hofmann, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 43, 6178 (2004). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.43.6178] 
  5. J. Yoo, K. Yoon, Y. Lee, S. Suh, J. Kim, and C. Yoo, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 39, 2680 (2000). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.39.2680] 
  6. C. Y. Chen and H. L. Lin, Ceram. Int., 30, 2075 (2004). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2003.11.010] 
  7. S. Kang, J. Lee, J. Yoo, S. A. Whang, S. Lee, S. Kee, I. Im, and C. Oh, Crystals, 12, 738 (2022). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12050738] 
  8. J. Yoo, S. Min, C. Park, S. Suh, H. Yoon, J. Kim, and S. Lee, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 41, 7011 (2002). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.41.7011]