The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (문화기술의 융합)

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived Fairness of Assessment in an Online Class

비대면 수업의 성적평가에 대한 지각된 공정성의 선행요인 및 결과요인

  • 이성미 (한신대학교 미디어영상광고홍보학부) ;
  • 채희상 (한신대학교 미디어영상광고홍보학부)
  • Received : 2023.04.05
  • Accepted : 2023.05.10
  • Published : 2023.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the antecedents and consequences of perceived fairness of assessment in an online class, such as Google classroom. Based on an extensive literature review, a research model and research questions were designed. We found that the perceived interactivity of contents and social presence were found to be antecedents of perceived fairness of assessment. Further, perceived fairness of assessment was found to have a substantial influence on class satisfaction and achievement.

본 연구는 비대면 수업 환경에서 학생들이 성적평가에 대해 어떻게 인식하고 있는지 구체적으로 이해를 돕고자 Google Classroom에 참여한 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 비대면 수업 성적평가에 대한 지각된 공정성의 선행요인과 결과요인을 탐색하였다. 우리는 콘텐츠 상호작용성 수준에 따라 학생들이 성적평가의 공정성을 인식하는 수준이 달라질 수 있음을 발견하였고 사회적 실재감이 학생들의 지각된 성적평가 공정성을 예측하는 변인임을 검증하였다. 또한, 지각된 성적평가 공정성은 수업에 대한 만족도와 학업 성취도에 유의미한 영향을 주는 것을 발견하였다. 5-8 바랍니다.

Keywords

References

  1. Strage, A. (2008). Traditional and non-traditional college students' descriptions of the "deal" professor and the "ideal" course and perceived strengths and limitations. College Student Journal, 42, 225-231.
  2. Chory-Assad, R. M. (2002). Classroom justice: Perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression. Communication Quarterly, 50(1), 58-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370209385646
  3. Joo, Youngju, Chung, Ae-Kyung, & Choi, Miran. (2016). Identification of the structural relationship between goal orientation, teaching presence, approaches to learning, satisfaction and academic achievement of online continuing education learners. The Journal of The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication, 16(2), 137-144. https:// doi.org/10.7236/JIIBC.2016.16.2.137
  4. Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation: The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26(2), 264-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00758.x
  5. Horan, S. M., & Myers, S. A. (2009). An exploration of college instructors' use of classroom justice, power, and behavior alteration techniques. Communication Education,58(4),483-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903055981
  6. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organization justice,1-55. Stanford University Press.
  7. Koo,Minju and Park,Jongkeun. (2023). The Effect of Types of College Entrance Examination on Academic Achievement of General Chemistry in Face-to-face and Non-face-to-face Teaching-Learning. The International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology , 11(1), 376-388.
  8. Liao, L. (2006). A Learning organization perspective on knowledge-sharing behavior and firm Innovation.Human System Management, 25(4), 227-236. DOI:10.3233/HSM-2006-25401
  9. Park,soyeon and Han,kwanghee. (2023). The Effects of Pedagogical Agent and Redundant Text on Learners' Social Presence and Intention to Continue Learning in Video Learning. The Journal of Convergence on Culture Technology, 9(2), 73-82.
  10. Hyeon-Cheol Kim. (2022). Exploring Social Experience as Mediator of Shopping Behavior in Live Streaming Commerce . The International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence, 11(1), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.7236/IJASC.2022.11.1.76
  11. Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 68-88. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864
  12. Mackey, K. R. M., & Freyberg, D. L. (2010). The effects of social presence on affective and cognitive learning in an international engineering course taught via distance learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 99-1, 23-34.DOI:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01039.x
  13. Radovan, M. (2011). The relation between distance students' motivation, their use of learning strategies, and academic success, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10-1, 216-222. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/53350/.
  14. Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P.(2006). Student engagement and student learning : Testing the linkage. Research in Higher Education, 47-1,1-32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40185882
  15. Price, J. L.; Muel er, C. W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
  16. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556. htps://doi.org/10.2307/256591