Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Convergence Reading Education on the Convergence Literacy of Adolescents: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Learning Motivation

융합독서교육이 청소년의 융합적 소양에 미치는 영향 - 학습동기의 매개효과를 중심으로 -

  • 조수연 (경기대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 조미아 (경기대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2023.04.21
  • Accepted : 2023.05.17
  • Published : 2023.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of school library reading classes on the convergence literacy of adolescents based on the convergence reading education model. To achieve this, elements of convergence education for future-oriented competence were derived from the level of reading education based on previous studies and literature, and the effectiveness of education was measured by conducting a convergence literacy test targeting 50 general high school students. In this study, reading classes and tests were conducted over 12 sessions from April 2022 to November 2022, and the study participants were divided into two groups, and convergence reading education and self-reading education were applied respectively. The analysis results of this study are as follows. First, It was verified that there was a significant difference in the promotion of convergent literacy of adolescents according to the method of reading education. Second, it was verified that convergence reading education had a significant effect on convergence literacy of adolescents such as convergence, creativity, self-direction and communication ability. Third, as a result of verifying whether learning motivation plays a mediating role in convergence reading education influencing convergent literacy, learning motivation played a partial mediating role and had an indirect effect on creativity, self-direction, and communication ability between convergence reading education and convergence literacy, but showed no significant mediating effect on convergence ability.

이 연구는 융합독서교육모형을 토대로 학교도서관 독서수업을 실시하여 청소년의 융합적 소양에 미치는 효과를 규명하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 선행연구 및 문헌을 바탕으로 미래지향적 역량을 위한 융합적 교육의 요소를 독서교육의 차원에서 도출하였고 일반계 고등학교 학생 50명을 대상으로 융합적 소양 검사를 수행하여 교육의 효과성을 측정하였다. 이 연구에서는 2022년 3월부터 2022년 11월까지 12차시에 걸쳐 독서수업 및 검사를 실시하였으며 연구대상을 두 집단으로 나누어 융합독서교육과 자율독서교육을 각각 적용하였다. 이 연구의 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 청소년의 융합적 소양의 증진에 있어 독서교육에 따른 유의한 차이가 검증되었다. 둘째, 융합독서교육은 융합력, 창의력, 자기주도성 및 소통능력 등 청소년의 융합적 소양에 유의한 효과가 있음이 검증되었다. 셋째, 융합독서교육이 융합적 소양에 영향을 미치는 데 있어 학습동기가 매개적 역할을 하는지 검증한 결과, 학습동기는 융합독서교육과 융합적 소양 사이에서 창의력, 자기주도성, 소통능력에 대해서는 부분매개 역할을 하며 간접효과를 미치는 것으로 나타났고 융합력에 대해서는 유의한 매개효과를 보이지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bak, Byung Gee, Lee, Jong Ug, & Hong, Seung Pyo (2005). Reconstructing the classificatory pattern of learning motivation proposed by self-determination theory. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(3), 699-717.
  2. Cha, Yun-kyung (2008). Multicultural education as an alternative educational model in the era of globalization. Multicultural Education Studies, 1(1), 1-23.
  3. Cha, Yun-kyung, Kim, Sun-ah, Kim, Si-jung, Moon, Jong-eun, Song, Ryun-jin, Park, Youngseok, Park, Joo-ho, Ahn, Sung-ho, Lee, Sam-hyung, Lee, Sun-kyung, Lee, Eun-yeon, Joo, Mi-kyung, Ham, Seung-hwan, & Hwang, Se-young (2014). Theory and Practice of Convergence Education. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  4. Cho, Hyun Chul (2011). The effects of academic motivation, self-determination, goal orientation, self-perception, implicit theory of intelligence and self-regulated learning strategies on learning attitude, behavior and outcomes. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(1), 33-60.
  5. Cho, Soo-Youn & Cho, Miah (2022). The development of education method and model for convergence reading education in school library. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 56(2), 5-33.
  6. Cho, Younsoon & Woo, Jaekyung (2003). The view of knowledge and educational values in the problem-based learning. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 41(3), 571-600.
  7. Cho, Younsoon (2006). Theory and Practice of Problem-Based Learning. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  8. Choi, Yu-Hyun, Noh, Jin-Ah, Lim, Yun-Jin, Lee, Dong-Won, Lee, Eun-Sang, & Noh, Jun-Ho (2013). The development of the STEAM literacy measurement instrument for elementary, junior-high, and high school students. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 177-198.
  9. Jeon, Jae Young (2012). A study on the meanings and implications for moral education of communities of practice. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 23(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.23.1.201203.75
  10. Jung, Joo Yun & Lee, Ji Hae (2021). The mediation effect of 'challenge spirit' on the relationship between the learning motivation and career development competency of Korean high school students: focusing on school types. Studies on Korean Youth, 32(2), 187-212. https://doi.org/10.14816/sky.2021.32.2.187
  11. Kang, Jung-Chan (2015a). The development of instructional design principles for creativity convergence education. Education Method Research, 27(3), 276-305. https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2015.27.3.276
  12. Kang, Jung-Chan (2015b). The development of teaching-learning method and instructional design model for creativity convergence reading education. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 19(3), 713-742. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2015.19.3.713
  13. Kim, Ahyoung (2008). The development of academic motivation among Korean adolescents. Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues, 14(1), 111-134.
  14. Kim, Hyangja, Kim, Sunny, Kim, Heesung, & Song, Sumin (2014). The case studies about educational effects on PBL(problem-based-learning)-focus on problem solving, self-directed learning and collaborative learning. Journal of Parent Education, 6(1), 1-20.
  15. Kim, Jinsoo (2012). STEAM Education Theory. Paju: Yangseowon.
  16. Kim, Jong-chul, Yoon, Yeo-tak, Koo, Bon-gwan, Min, Byung-gon, & Ko, Jung-hee (2015). Korean Language Education for Creativity and Convergence. Seoul: A Social Review.
  17. Kim, Wang-Dong (2012). Building conceptual framework to bring up talents capable of creative fusion: from the perspective of fusion between science and technology and art. The Journal of the Korean Society for Gifted and Talented, 11(1), 97-119.
  18. Lee, Seung-Eun (2020). Possibilities and limitations of creativity education through competencybased curriculum. Korean Journal of Thinking Development, 16(2), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.51636/JOTD.2020.08.16.2.31
  19. Lee, Si-Ye & Lee, Hyeong Cheol (2013). The effects of science lesson applying STEAM education on the creativity and science related attitudes of elementary school students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(1), 60-70.
  20. Lee, Tae San (2019). The mediating effects of learning motivation on the relationship between career development competencies and satisfaction of adolescents' career activity participation. The Journal of Business Education, 33(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.34274/KRABE.2019.33.6.001
  21. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (2022). 2021 National Survey of Reading Status. Available: http://www.mcst.go.kr
  22. Ministry of Education (2015). Notice of Elementary and Secondary School Curriculum Overview and Curriculum. #2015-74.
  23. Ministry of Education (2022). The Main Points of the General Outline in 2022 Revised Educational Curriculum(plan). #2022-33.
  24. Yang, Ji Sun & Yoo, Taemyung (2019). Analysis on reflection characteristics of the key competencies proposed by the OECD education 2030 in the 2015 revised home economics curriculum. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 31(2), 113-135. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2019.06.31.2.113
  25. Yang, Mikyeong (2011). Exploring the principles of collaborative learning for realization of collective intelligence. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 23(2), 457-483. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2011.23.2.457
  26. Aronson, E. (1978). The Jigsaw Classroom. Washinton: Sage.
  27. Banks, J. (2008). An Introduction to Multicultural Education (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  28. Beyer, H. G. (2001). The Theory of Evolution Strategies. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
  29. De Vries, D. L. & Slavin, R. E. (1978). Teams-Games-Tournaments (TGT): review of ten classroom experiments. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12(1), 28-38.
  30. Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. The Educational Forum, 50(3), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764
  31. Gardner, H. (1991). Intelligence in seven steps. In Dickinson, D. eds. Creating the Future: Perspective on Educational Change. Washington, DC: New Horizons for Learning, 395-406.
  32. Gardner, H. (2006). Changing Minds: The Art and Science of Changing Our Own and Other Peoples Minds. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press.
  33. Greenberger, E. (1984). Defining psychosocial maturity in adolescence. Advances in Child Behavioral Analysis & Therapy, 3, 1-37.
  34. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  35. Kim, Y., Deci, E. L., & Zuckerman, M. (2002). The development of the self-regulation of withholding negative emotions questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(2), 316-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164402062002008
  36. Krashen, S. D. (2004). The Power of Reading: Insights from the Research (2nd ed.). London: Libraries Unlimited.
  37. OECD. (2018a). OECD learning compass 2030. Available: https://www.oecd.org
  38. OECD. (2018b). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  39. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
  40. Slavin, R. E. (1978). Student teams and comparison among equals: effects on academic performance and student attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 532.
  41. Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life In Our Times. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  42. UNESCO (1996). Learning: the treasure within; report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the 21st Century. Availble: https://unesdoc.unesco.org
  43. UNESCO (2021). Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. Availble: https://unesdoc.unesco.org