DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Ventral Midline and Right Flank Approaches of Ovariohysterectomy in Bitches

  • Ishwor Dhakal (Department of Surgery and Pharmacology, FAVF, Agriculture and Forestry University) ;
  • Bharata Regmi (Department of Surgery and Pharmacology, FAVF, Agriculture and Forestry University) ;
  • Bablu Thakur (Department of Surgery and Pharmacology, FAVF, Agriculture and Forestry University) ;
  • Ishwari Tiwari (Department of Surgery and Pharmacology, FAVF, Agriculture and Forestry University) ;
  • Shraddha Tiwari (College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Yeonsu Oh (College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Manoj K. Shah (Department of Surgery and Pharmacology, FAVF, Agriculture and Forestry University)
  • Received : 2022.10.21
  • Accepted : 2023.01.16
  • Published : 2023.02.28

Abstract

The ventral midline approach (VMA) and right flank approach (RFA) are common procedures for the sterilization of bitches. This study compared the different parameters viz. total duration of surgery, recovery time, and length of the incision as well as body temperature, heart rate, respiration rate, and SpO2 in each approach. Twenty (20) bitches were divided randomly for the RFA and VMA. Meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously half an hour before the induction to provide preemptive analgesia. Diazepam and ketamine were administered intravenously at dose rates of 0.25 mg/kg and 2.5 mg/kg, and 0.17 mg/kg and 3.33 mg/kg, respectively to produce and maintain anesthesia. Each parameter was recorded at the pre-operative, operative and post-operative times. The average duration of surgery and length of incision of RFA (16.1 ± 5.13 min and 2.44 ± 0.83 cm) were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the VMA (21.3 ± 5.48 min and 3.53 ± 0.7 cm). The operated bitches showed hypothermia (p < 0.05) at 1 hour compared to baseline and 24 hours of surgery. Heart and respiration rates increased significantly (p < 0.05) during traction and severing of ovarian ligaments in bitches within the RFA group, but there was no significant difference within VMA approaches. The sedation score was significantly higher (p < 0.05) at 1 hour after surgery in both approaches. Based on the duration of surgery and length of incision RFA approach was quick and minimal skin wound. Further studies on bitches considering molecular investigations of surgical stress are imperative.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) through Animal Disease Management Technology Advancement Support Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (Project No. 122013-2).

References

  1. Acharya M, Sah MK, Singh DK, Singh S, Dhakal S. Comparative advantage of keyhole right flank laparotomy and ventral midline celiotomy for ovariohysterectomy in bitches. Int J Appl Sci Biotechnol 2016; 4: 198-202. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijasbt.v4i2.15098
  2. Adin CA. Complications of ovariohysterectomy and orchiectomy in companion animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2011; 41: 1023-1039, viii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2011.05.004
  3. Asrat M, Melkamu S. Review on ovariohysterectomy: surgical approach, post-operative complications and their management in bitches. Int J Adv Multidiscip Res 2018; 5: 20-28.
  4. Babu M, Krishnaswamy A, Nethra R, Narasimhamurthy. Comparison of two different laparotomy techniques for ovariohysterectomy and post-surgical complications in cats. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2019; 8: 331-334. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.805.038
  5. Davidson EB, Moll HD, Payton ME. Comparison of laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy and ovariohysterectomy in dogs. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04003.x
  6. Dutta A, Maiti SK, Ajith P, Kumar N. Evaluation of different laparoscopic sterilization techniques in a canine birth control program. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2010; 34: 393-402. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-0908-24
  7. Fazio E, Medica P, Cravana C, Pupillo A, Ferlazzo A. Effects of ovariohysterectomy in dogs and cats on adrenocortical, haematological and behavioural parameters. Acta Sci Vet 2015; 43: 1339.
  8. Fieni F, Topie E, Gogny A. Medical treatment for pyometra in dogs. Reprod Domest Anim 2014; 49 Suppl 2: 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12302
  9. Hancock R. Comparison of postoperative pain following ovariohysterectomy via harmonic scalpel-assisted laparoscopy versus traditional celiotomy in dogs. Blacksburg: Virginia Tech; 2005. [thesis].
  10. Hancock RB, Lanz OI, Waldron DR, Duncan RB, Broadstone RV, Hendrix PK. Comparison of postoperative pain after ovariohysterectomy by harmonic scalpel-assisted laparoscopy compared with median celiotomy and ligation in dogs. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2005.00041.x
  11. Hardie EM, Hansen BD, Carroll GS. Behavior after ovariohysterectomy in the dog: what's normal? Appl Anim Behav Sci 1997; 51: 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01078-7
  12. Howe LM. Surgical methods of contraception and sterilization. Theriogenology 2006; 66: 500-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.04.005
  13. Hu XY, Luan L, Guan W, Shi J, Zhao YB, Fan HG. Tolfenamic acid and meloxicam both provide an adequate degree of postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Vet Med 2017; 62: 333-341. https://doi.org/10.17221/143/2016-VETMED
  14. Kiani FA, Kachiwal AB, Shah MG, Nizamani ZA, Khand FM, Lochi GM, et al. Comparative study on midline and flank approaches for ovariohystrectomy in cats. J Agric Food Tech 2014; 4: 21-31.
  15. Lascelles BD, Butterworth SJ, Waterman AE. Postoperative analgesic and sedative effects of carprofen and pethidine in dogs. Vet Rec 1994; 134: 187-191. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.134.8.187
  16. Lee JM, Nam TC. Hyperestrogenic dermatitis after ovariohysterectomy in a dog. J Vet Clin 2001; 18: 448-451.
  17. McGrath H, Hardie RJ, Davis E. Lateral flank approach for ovariohysterectomy in small animals. Compendium 2004; 26: 922-930.
  18. Muraro L, White RS. Complications of ovariohysterectomy procedures performed in 1880 dogs. Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2014; 42: 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1623776
  19. Mwangi WE, Mogoa EM, Mwangi JN, Mbuthia PG, Mbugua SW. A systematic review of analgesia practices in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Vet World 2018; 11: 1725-1735. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.1725-1735
  20. Sakundech K, Chompoosan C, Tuchpramuk P, Boonsorn T, Aengwanich W. The influence of duration on pain stress, oxidative stress, and total antioxidant power status in female dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Vet World 2020; 13: 160-164. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.160-164
  21. Sanborn LJ. Long-term health risks and benefits associated with spay / neuter in dogs. New Brunswick: Rutgers University; 2007.
  22. Sharda R, Sahu D, Dewangan R, Panchkhande N, Sidar S, Yadav D. Conventional ventral midline and right flank approach for ovariohysterectomy in female dogs. Indian J Anim Sci 2022; 92: 565-569. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v92i5.111066
  23. Shih AC, Robertson S, Isaza N, Pablo L, Davies W. Comparison between analgesic effects of buprenorphine, carprofen, and buprenorphine with carprofen for canine ovariohysterectomy. Vet Anaesth Analg 2008; 35: 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2007.00352.x
  24. Smith FO. Canine pyometra. Theriogenology 2006; 66: 610-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.04.023
  25. Sorenmo KU, Shofer FS, Goldschmidt MH. Effect of spaying and timing of spaying on survival of dogs with mammary carcinoma. J Vet Intern Med 2000; 14: 266-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2000.tb01165.x
  26. Stampfli HR. MSD veterinary manual. Tetanus in horses. Rahway: Merck & Co., Inc. 2019.
  27. Warne LN, Beths T, Carter JE, Whittem T, Bauquier SH. Evaluation of the influence of atipamezole on the postoperative analgesic effect of buprenorphine in cats undergoing a surgical ovariohysterectomy. Vet Anaesth Analg 2016; 43: 424-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12340
  28. Williamson JA, Johnson JT, Anderson S, Spangler D, Stonerook M, Dascanio JJ. A randomized trial comparing freely moving and zonal instruction of veterinary surgical skills using ovariohysterectomy models. J Vet Med Educ 2019; 46: 195-204. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0817-009r