DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Purchasing Attributes for Consumption Activation of Environment-friendly Agricultural Processed Foods

친환경농산물 가공식품 소비 활성화를 위한 구매속성 분석

  • 황정서 (단국대학교 환경자원경제학과 ) ;
  • 정다은 (단국대학교 환경자원경제학과 )
  • Received : 2022.12.02
  • Accepted : 2023.02.07
  • Published : 2023.02.28

Abstract

The activation of consumption of environment-friendly agricultural processed foods means not only the growth of environment-friendly agriculture, but also the development of related industries. Therefore, it is necessary to identify and apply the needs and purchasing attributes of environment-friendly agricultural processed food consumers. For this, survey was conducted to adult men and women in their 20s and 60s and a total of 200 copies were used for empirical analysis. In this study, the average difference between importance-satisfaction for purchase attributes of environment-friendly agricultural processed food was verified, and the IPA Matrix was prepared based on this. As a result, in terms of purchasing importance and satisfaction, it was found that those with no experience in purchasing environment-friendly agricultural processed foods regarded product, price, place, promotion as more important than those with experience in purchasing. In case of IPA, product and price factors were all important and satisfactory regardless of purchasing experience. On the other hand, it was found that the key factors for promotion were neither important nor satisfied with consumers regardless of their purchasing experience. Therefore, it is mainly necessary to focus on marketing and mass media promotion. At the same time, various domestic and foreign best practices should be benchmarked and a 4P marketing strategy should be established and promoted.

Keywords

References

  1. An, C. S., W. T. Kin, and H. Kin. 2018. Production and Consumption Status of Ecofriendly Agricultural Products and future challenges. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 26(4): 585-597. https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2018.26.4.585
  2. Azzopardi, E. and R. Nash. 2013. A Critical Evaluation of Importance -Performance Analysis. Tourism Management. 35: 222-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.07.007
  3. Bae, J. S. 2022. Effectiveness of marketing mix in participatory sports through metaanalysis. Korean Journal of Sports Science. 31(5): 617-631. https://doi.org/10.35159/kjss.2022.10.31.5.617
  4. Baek, S. W., S. H. KIM, and J. W. Hwang. 2017. The Study on Consumers' Preference and Purchasing Property of Processed Grain Products. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 25(3): 537-554. https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2017.25.3.537
  5. Choi, D. C. 2011. The Improvement of Certification Institution for Small Farming Cycling System. Korean J. Org. Agric. 19: 435-461.
  6. Chong, Y. K., S. Y. Lim, and C. J. Lee. 2014. Effect of Consumers' Perceived Marketing Mix Activities on Brand Image and Brand Loyalty: Focusing on Marketing Mix Activities of Starbucks. Journal of Tourism Sciences. 38(3): 167-189.
  7. Duke, C. R. and M. A Persia. 1996. Consumer-Defined Dimensions for the Escorted Tour Industry Segment: Expectations, Satisfactions, and Importance. Journal of travel & tourism marketing. 5: 77-99. https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v05n01_06
  8. Han, S. D., S. H, Yun, and D. H. Jang. 2016. An importance-performance analysis of using farmers in a rice co-nursery. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science. 43(1): 144-151. https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20160017
  9. Hwang, J. h. 2022. A Study on the Marketing Strategy of Environment-friendly Agricultural Products. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 17(3): 327-345.
  10. Jeong, H. K. and J. H. Han. 2018. An Analysis of the Amount of Willingness to Pay for Environment-friendly Agricultural Processed Foods by the Level of Consumption Intention. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 26(4): 543-558. https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2018.26.4.543
  11. Jeong, H. K., J. H. Sung, and H. J. Lee. 2019. Actual conditions of production and consumption of Eco-friendly agricultural products of domestic/abroad and future issues. KREI Issue Report. Korea Rural Economic Research Institute.
  12. Jeong, H. K., J. H. Sung, and H. J. Lee. 2019. Production and Consumption Status of Eco-friendly Agricultural Products and future challenges. Issue Paper 66. Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  13. Jeong, H. K. and J. J. Kyung. 2012. Analysis of Consumption of Homemade Organically Processed Food. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 20(1): 1-19.
  14. Kim, J. S. and K. S. Ha. 2010. Selection of Attributes and Pursuit Benefits of Processed Fishery Products. Korean Journal of Food Culture. 25(5): 516-524.
  15. Kotler, P. 1999. Marketing management: The millennium edition (Vol. 199). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  16. Lee, C. J., J. H. Kim, J. Lee, and S. J. Kim. 2017. Verification of the usefulness of smartphone for wrist swing motion in VR environments. Journal of Korea Society. 17(3): 53-62. https://doi.org/10.7583/JKGS.2017.17.3.53
  17. Lee, J. H. and W. K. Kim. 2011. An Importance-Satisfaction Analysis on Corporate Social Responsibility of Pro-Baseball Team thorough an IPA Method. Korean Journal of Sport Science. 22(2): 1986-1998. https://doi.org/10.24985/kjss.2011.22.2.1986
  18. Lim, Y. H. 2020. Changes in Food Paradigm and Responses in the Post-Corona Times. Future Horizon. 62-27.
  19. Martilla, J. A. and C. J. James. 1977. Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing. 41(1): 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
  20. McCarthy, E. J., S. J. Shapiro, and W. D. Perreault. 1979. Basic marketing. Toronto, ON, Canada: Irwin-Dorsey.
  21. Park, H. J., N. R. Oh, J. A. Jang, H. R. Yoon, and M. S. Cho. 2016. Study on Importance-Performance Analysis Regarding Selection Attributes of Rice-Convenience Foods. 45(4): 593-601.
  22. Park, J. S. and E. S. Lyu. 2014. Importance and Performance of High School Food service Hygiene in Busan. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition. 43(11): 1757-1765. https://doi.org/10.3746/JKFN.2014.43.11.1757
  23. Park, M. E., H. S. Oh, and S. H. Kim. 2019. Food Related Lifestyle Profiles and Organically Processed Foods buying Behaviors: Applying a Person-centered Approach. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 27(3): 247-269.
  24. Park, M. E. and S. E. you. 2019. Consumer Characteristics Related with Choice of Organically Processed Foods: Focused on Extended Theory of Planned Behavior and Food-Related Lifestyle. 30(6): 143-170. https://doi.org/10.35736/JCS.30.6.7
  25. Ryu, J. M. 2003. The Effect of Marketing Mix elements on brand Equity. Industrial Convergence Research. 1(1): 41-70.
  26. Tonge, J. and S. A. Moore. 2007. Importance-satisfaction Analysis for Marine-park Hinterlands: A Western Austalian Case Study. Tourism Management. 28: 768-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.05.007
  27. Yum, Y. M. 2020. 2020 Survey of Environmentally Friendly Agricultural Products Stores. Distribution Focus. NEWMA. 20(3).