Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Proposal of Process Model for Research Data Quality Management

연구데이터 품질관리를 위한 프로세스 모델 제안

  • 한나은 (한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI))
  • Received : 2023.02.14
  • Accepted : 2023.03.15
  • Published : 2023.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed the government data quality management model, big data quality management model, and data lifecycle model for research data management, and analyzed the components common to each data quality management model. Those data quality management models are designed and proposed according to the lifecycle or based on the PDCA model according to the characteristics of target data, which is the object that performs quality management. And commonly, the components of planning, collection and construction, operation and utilization, and preservation and disposal are included. Based on this, the study proposed a process model for research data quality management, in particular, the research data quality management to be performed in a series of processes from collecting to servicing on a research data platform that provides services using research data as target data was discussed in the stages of planning, construction and operation, and utilization. This study has significance in providing knowledge based for research data quality management implementation methods.

본 연구는 공공데이터 품질관리 모델, 빅데이터 품질관리 모델, 그리고 연구데이터 관리를 위한 데이터 생애주기 모델을 분석하여 각 품질관리 모델에서 공통적으로 나타나는 구성 요인을 분석하였다. 품질관리 모델은 품질관리를 수행하는 객체인 대상 데이터의 특성에 따라 생애주기에 맞추어 혹은 PDCA 모델을 바탕으로 구축되고 제안되는데 공통적으로 계획, 수집 및 구축, 운영 및 활용, 보존 및 폐기의 구성요소가 포함된다. 이를 바탕으로 본 연구는 연구데이터를 대상으로 한 품질관리 프로세스 모델을 제안하였는데, 특히 연구데이터를 대상 데이터로 하여 서비스를 제공하는 연구데이터 서비스 플랫폼에서 데이터를 수집하여 서비스하는 일련의 과정에서 수행해야하는 품질관리에 대해 계획, 구축 및 운영, 활용단계로 나누어 논의하였다. 본 연구는 연구데이터 품질관리 수행 방안을 위한 지식 기반을 제공하는데 의의를 갖는다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원 연구사업(과제번호: K-23-L01-C03-S01)의 지원에 의해 이루어진 것임.

References

  1. Framework Act on Science and Technology. No. 18727. 
  2. Han, Na-Eun & Kim, Seong-Hee (2014). Comparative analysis on digital curation process in foreign academic libraries. The Korea Journal of Library and Information Science, 45, 93-116. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.2.201406.93 
  3. Jung, Hye-Jung (2007). A study of the data quality evaluation. Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 8(4), 119-128. 
  4. Kim, Hyung-Sub (2020). A study on the data quality management evaluation model. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 11(7), 217-222. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2020.11.7.217 
  5. Kim, Juseop, Kim, Suntae, & Jeon Yerin (2019). Data life cycle proposal for research data management. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(4), 309-340. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.4.309 
  6. Kim, Sunho & Lee, Changsoo (2013). The process reference model for the data quality management process assessment. The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 18(4), 83-105. https://doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2013.18.4.083 
  7. Korea Data Agency (2006). Data Quality Management Guidelines(Ver 2.1). 
  8. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2019). Establishment of Research Data Sharing and Dissemination System (K-19-L01-C03). 
  9. Ministry of Security and Public Administration (2014). Government Data Management Guidelines, No. 2014-13. 
  10. National Information Society Agency (2015). Government Data Quality Management Level Evaluation Model. Report data of the 13th Open Quality Expert Committee of the National Information Society Agency. 
  11. National Information Society Agency (2018). Open Government Data Quality Management Manual v2.0. 
  12. National Information Society Agency (2021). Big Data Platform and Center Data Quality Management Guide. 
  13. National Research and Development Innovation Act. No. 18645. 
  14. National Research Council of Science and Technology (2019). Research Data Management Guidelines (2019-07). 
  15. Park, Go-Eun & Kim, Chang-Jae (2015). Quality characteristics of public open data. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(10), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.10.135 
  16. Song, Chi-Ho & Yim, Jin-Hee (2022). A study on data quality evaluation of administrative information dataset. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 71, 237-272. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2022.71.237 
  17. Telecommunications Technology Association (2022). Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.1. 
  18. Data quality - Part 1: Overview. ISO 8000-1:2022. 
  19. Eckerson, W. (2002). Data warehousing special report: Data quality and the bottom line. Applications Development Trends, 1(1), 1-9. 
  20. English, L. P. (2009). Information quality applied: Best practices for improving business information, processes and systems. New Jersey: Wiley. 
  21. Kindling, M. & Strecker, D. (2022). Data Quality Assurance at Research Data Repositories. Data Science Journal, 21(1). http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2022-018 
  22. National Science Foundation (2014). Proposal and award policies and procedures guide (nsf15001). 
  23. Wang, R. Y., Ziad, M., & Lee, Y. W. (2006). Data quality. Vol. 23. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.