Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine (대한예방의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Influencing Suicidal Ideation According to the Deprivation Indices of Different Regions in Korea

  • Yun-Young Kim (Department of Social Welfare, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Hyung-Joo Park (Department of Social Welfare, Jeonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2022.08.12
  • Accepted : 2022.12.15
  • Published : 2023.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined how deprivation differed by region and the effect those differences had on suicidal ideation among the local population. Methods: Data collected over 10 years (2012-2021) in the Korea Welfare Panel Study were organized into 3 categories: metropolitan, city, and rural. A panel analysis was conducted on the impact of deprivation indices, socio-demographic characteristics, and life satisfaction on suicidal ideation in each category. Results: Income, divorce status, family relationship satisfaction, and medical deprivation had a significant impact on suicidal ideation in metropolitan areas, whereas these variables did not have significant effects in rural areas. In other words, income, family, and medical support were more impactful in city areas. Conclusions: Although the deprivation index was higher in rural areas than in city areas due to an aging population and reduced income levels, the mental health of rural residents was found to be generally better than that of city residents. The possibility that this is related to the strength of relationships within the respective communities should be considered in light of recent discussions on relational welfare.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by National University Development Project at Jeonbuk National University in 2021.

References

  1. Townsend P. Deprivation. J Soc Policy 1987;16(2):125-146.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279400020341
  2. Salmond C, Crampton P, King P, Waldegrave C. NZiDep: a New Zealand index of socioeconomic deprivation for individuals. Soc Sci Med 2006;62(6):1474-1485.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.008
  3. Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government. National statistics: English indices of deprivation 2015 [cited 2022 Aug 1]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2015. 
  4. Cottam H. Relational welfare. Soundings 2011;48(48):134-144.  https://doi.org/10.3898/136266211797146855
  5. Hyland P, Shevlin M, McBride O, Murphy J, Karatzias T, Bentall RP, et al. Anxiety and depression in the Republic of Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2020;142(3):249-256.  https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13219
  6. Marmot M, Wilkinson RG. Psychosocial and material pathways in the relation between income and health: a response to Lynch et al. BMJ 2001;322(7296):1233-1236.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7296.1233
  7. Wilkinson RG, Pickett KE. The problems of relative deprivation: why some societies do better than others. Soc Sci Med 2007;65(9):1965-1978.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.041
  8. Hawton K, Casanas I Comabella C, Haw C, Saunders K. Risk factors for suicide in individuals with depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 2013;147(1-3):17-28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.004
  9. Ministry of Health and Welfare. COVID-19 national mental health survey in 2021. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2021, p. 69-85 (Korean). 
  10. Beeghley L. Individual and structural explanations of poverty. Popul Res Policy Rev 1988;7(3):201-222.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02456102
  11. Massey DS, Denton NA. Trends in the residential segregation of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians: 1970-1980. Am Sociol Rev 1987;52(6):802-825.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2095836
  12. Klerman GL. Clinical epidemiology of suicide. J Clin Psychiatry 1987;48 Suppl:33-38. 
  13. Yum SO, Moon JW. The effect of socioeconomic deprivation experiences of middle and old age group on depression: focusing on mediating effect of family conflict. Korean J Care Manag 2017;25:53-76 (Korean). 
  14. Gomila R. Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen 2021;150(4):700-709.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000920
  15. Choi M, Lim J, Chang SS, Hwang M, Kim CS, Ki M. Financial hardship and suicide ideation: age and gender difference in a Korean panel study. J Affect Disord 2021;294:889-896.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.102
  16. Castells-Quintana D, Royuela V, Veneri P. Inequality and city size: an analysis for OECD functional urban areas. Pap Reg Sci 2020;99(4):1045-1064.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12520
  17. Kim YY, Choi YJ. Does social protection crowd out social investment? Policy Soc 2020;39(2):208-225.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1677377
  18. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. Korea Welfare Panel Study: user's guide for the 16th year [cited 2023 Jan 18]. Available from: https://www.koweps.re.kr:442/data/guide/list.do (Korean). 
  19. Kim YY, Jeon YH, Kim BY. The deprivation index, suicidal ideation, and social service innovation measures for the elderly in the COVID-19 era. In: 2021 Social Welfare Joint Academic Conference Materials. 2021, p. 119-136 (Korean). 
  20. Baek JW. COVID-19 and Korea's suicide prevention measures; 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 1]. Available from: http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&CONT_SEQ=359730&page=1 (Korean). 
  21. Glaeser EL, Resseger M, Tobio K. Inequality in cities. J Reg Sci 2009;49(4):617-646.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00627.x
  22. Wilkinson RG. Unhealthy societies: the afflictions of inequality. 1st ed. London: Routledge; 1996, p. 72-75. 
  23. Masten AS. Ordinary magic. Resilience processes in development. Am Psychol 2001;56(3):227-238.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227
  24. Wilkinson RG. The impact of inequality: how to make sick societies healthier. London: Routledge; 2005, p. 33-38.