Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

  • 제56권1호
  • /
  • Pages.12-20
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1975-8375(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-4521(eISSN)
대한예방의학회 (The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Qualitative Research in Healthcare: Necessity and Characteristics

  • Jeehee Pyo (Department of Preventive Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Won Lee (Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Eun Young Choi (College of Nursing, Sungshin Women's University) ;
  • Seung Gyeong Jang (Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Minsu Ock (Department of Preventive Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2022.10.30
  • 심사 : 2022.12.23
  • 발행 : 2023.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Quantitative and qualitative research explore various social phenomena using different methods. However, there has been a tendency to treat quantitative studies using complicated statistical techniques as more scientific and superior, whereas relatively few qualitative studies have been conducted in the medical and healthcare fields. This review aimed to provide a proper understanding of qualitative research. This review examined the characteristics of quantitative and qualitative research to help researchers select the appropriate qualitative research methodology. Qualitative research is applicable in following cases: (1) when an exploratory approach is required on a topic that is not well known, (2) when something cannot be explained fully with quantitative research, (3) when it is necessary to newly present a specific view on a research topic that is difficult to explain with existing views, (4) when it is inappropriate to present the rationale or theoretical proposition for designing hypotheses, as in quantitative research, and (5) when conducting research that requires detailed descriptive writing with literary expressions. Qualitative research is conducted in the following order: (1) selection of a research topic and question, (2) selection of a theoretical framework and methods, (3) literature analysis, (4) selection of the research participants and data collection methods, (5) data analysis and description of findings, and (6) research validation. This review can contribute to the more active use of qualitative research in healthcare, and the findings are expected to instill a proper understanding of qualitative research in researchers who review qualitative research reports and papers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Oxford Learner's Dictionaries. Research [cited 2022 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/research_1?q=research. 
  2. Merriam-Webster. Research [cited 2022 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/research. 
  3. Less JS. Educational, psychological, social research methodology. Seoul: Kyoyookbook; 2009 (Korean). 
  4. Chung J, Cho JJ. Use of qualitative research in the field of health. Korean J Fam Med 2008;29(8):553-562 (Korean). 
  5. Lee HY, Park JH, Choi YJ. Current status of health services research in primary care in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2016;59(11):888-895 (Korean).  https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2016.59.11.888
  6. Bae JK, Kim YY, Lee JS. Trend of social medicine researches of Korea. Health Soc Sci 2016;43(1):115-138 (Korean).  https://doi.org/10.21489/hass.2016.12.43.115
  7. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2015. 
  8. Jo SN, Lee HJ, Joo YJ, Kim NY. Qualitative research method and practice. Seoul: Greenpress; 2011 (Korean). 
  9. Baek SY. The meaning and limitation of qualitative research: comparing with quantitative research. J Inf Syst 2006;15(1):239-254 (Korean). 
  10. Pyo J, Lee M, Ock M, Lee J. Quality of life and health in patients with chronic periodontitis: a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17(13):4895. 
  11. Pyo J, Ock M, Lee M, Kim J, Cheon J, Cho J, et al. Unmet needs related to the quality of life of advanced cancer patients in Korea: a qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care 2021;20(1):58. 
  12. Pyo J, Ock M, Park B, Kim NE, Choi EJ, Park H, et al. Meaning and status of health-related quality of life recognized by medical professionals: a qualitative study. J Korean Med Sci 2021;36(3):e20. 
  13. Pyo J, Lee M, Ock M, Park G, Yang D, Park J, et al. Bus workers' experiences with and perceptions of a health promotion program: a qualitative study using a focus group discussion. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17(6):1992. 
  14. Ock M, Pyo J, Kim OH, Chae C, Ye BJ, Kim SH, et al. Experience and awareness of health managers, administrators, and workers on a hearing conservation program in Korea: a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17(7):2302. 
  15. Ock M, Kim JE, Jo MW, Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Lee JY. Perceptions of primary care in Korea: a comparison of patient and physician focus group discussions. BMC Fam Pract 2014;15:178.
  16. Lazzerini M, Semenzato C, Kaur J, Covi B, Argentini G. Women's suggestions on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn hospital care: a qualitative study in Italy using the WHO standards as framework for the analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20(1):200. 
  17. Sion KY, Verbeek H, de Boer B, Zwakhalen SM, Odekerken-Schroder G, Schols JM, et al. How to assess experienced quality of care in nursing homes from the client's perspective: results of a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr 2020;20(1):67. 
  18. Maula A, LaFond N, Orton E, Iliffe S, Audsley S, Vedhara K, et al. Use it or lose it: a qualitative study of the maintenance of physical activity in older adults. BMC Geriatr 2019;19(1):349. 
  19. Luchtenberg ML, Maeckelberghe EL, Locock L, Verhagen AA. Understanding the child-doctor relationship in research participation: a qualitative study. BMC Pediatr 2020;20(1):353. 
  20. Della Vecchia C, Preau M, Carpentier C, Viprey M, Haesebaert J, Termoz A, et al. Illness beliefs and emotional responses in mildly disabled stroke survivors: a qualitative study. PLoS One 2019;14(10):e0223681. 
  21. Pyo J, Ock M, Han YJ. Medical litigation experience of the victim of medical accident: a qualitative case study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2019;14(1):1595958. 
  22. Kim JY. Mental health in LGBTs resulting from family rejection: consensual qualitative research. Korean Psychol J Cult Soc Issues 2017;23(4):605-634 (Korean).  https://doi.org/10.20406/kjcs.2017.11.23.4.605
  23. Ock M, Kim JH, Lee SI. A legal framework for improving patient safety in Korea. Health Policy Manag 2015;25(3):174-184 (Korean).  https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2015.25.3.174
  24. Pyo J, Han YJ, Ock M. A qualitative case study on the medical litigation experience of bereaved families due to medical accident. Korean J Couns 2018;19(5):25-49 (Korean).  https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.19.5.201810.25
  25. Lee W, Pyo J, Jang SG, Choi JE, Ock M. Experiences and responses of second victims of patient safety incidents in Korea: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2019;19(1):100. 
  26. Pyo J, Lee W, Jang SG, Choi EY, Ock M, Lee SI. Does the disclosure of patient safety incidents satisfy those who have been harmed? Korean J Med Ethics 2019;22(4):321-340 (Korean).  https://doi.org/10.35301/ksme.2019.22.4.321
  27. Pyo J, Choi EY, Lee W, Jang SG, Park YK, Ock M, et al. Physicians' difficulties due to patient safety incidents in Korea: a cross-sectional study. J Korean Med Sci 2020;35(17):e118. 
  28. Choi EY, Pyo J, Lee W, Jang SG, Park YK, Ock M, et al. Nurses' experiences of patient safety incidents in Korea: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2020;10(10):e037741. 
  29. Tariq S, Woodman J. Using mixed methods in health research. JRSM Short Rep 2013;4(6):2042533313479197. 
  30. Yoo KW, Jeong JW, Kim YS, Kim HB. Understanding qualitative research methods. 2nd ed. Seoul: Pakyoungsa; 2018 (Korean). 
  31. Kim YC. Qualitative research methodology. 1: Bricoleur. 3rd ed. Seoul: Academypress; 2016 (Korean). 
  32. Seidman I. Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press; 2006. 
  33. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2015.