DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

FIDIC White Book 일반조건 핵심 리스크 세부조항 도출 - 피딕 클라이언트/컨설턴트 모델 서비스 계약, 2017년 5판 기준으로 -

Deriving Key Risk Sub-Clauses of General Conditions of FIDIC White Book - Based on FIDIC Client/Consultant Model Services Agreement, 5th edition 2017 -

  • 제재용 (충북대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 홍성열 (충북대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 서성철 (충북대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 박형근 (충북대학교 토목공학과)
  • Jei, Jaeyong (School of Civil Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Hong, Seongyeoll (School of Civil Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Seo, Sungchul (School of Civil Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Hyungkeun (School of Civil Engineering, Chungbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.11.16
  • 심사 : 2023.02.20
  • 발행 : 2023.03.31

초록

FIDIC White Book은 클라이언트와 컨설턴트간 모델 서비스 계약조건이다. 본 연구는 델파이 기법을 활용하여 FIDIC White Book 일반조건의 63개 세부조항들 중 핵심 리스크 세부조항 도출을 목표로 하였다. 해외건설 서비스계약 및 FIDIC White Book에 대한 10년 이상의 경험과 전문지식을 보유한 40명의 전문가 패널을 구성하여 총 3회의 델파이 조사 과정을 통해 전문가의 의견 일치성을 높이는 방향으로 신뢰성을 향상시켰다. 델파이 1차 조사에서는 일반조건 63개 세부조항들 중 리스크의 영향력을 리커트 5점 척도로 폐쇄형 설문조사를 수행하였고 26개의 주요 리스크 세부조항들을 도출하였다. 델파이 1차 조사결과의 내용 타당성은 내용타당도 CVR값으로 검증하였다. 델파이 2차 및 3차 조사에서는 26개의 주요 리스크 세부조항들에 대하여 리커트 10점 척도로 폐쇄형 설문조사를 수행하고 각각의 리스크 발생도 및 영향도를 평가하였다. 델파이 3차 조사 결과의 신뢰성은 변이계수 COV값으로 검증하였다. 26개의 주요 리스크 세부조항들 각각의 리스크 발생도와 영향도 평균값을 PI Risk Matrix에 적용하여 총 14개의 핵심 리스크 세부조항들을 도출하였다. 핵심 리스크 세부조항 도출결과는 구체적인 서비스 범위의 합의, 지연관리, 변경관리가 가장 중요한 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과로 실무관점에서는 컨설팅업체의 컨설턴트가 클라이언트와 서비스 계약을 체결할 때 계약적 리스크 최소화를 위해 검토해야 하는 가이드라인을 제공해 주고 있다. 학문적 관점에서는 해외건설에 참여하는 컨설턴트들을 위한 서비스 계약 관련 핵심리스크 도출에 대한 연구의 방향성을 제시하고 있다.

FIDIC White Book is a Model Services Agreement between the Client and the Consultant. This study aimed to derive the Key Risk Sub-Clauses out of 63 Sub-Clauses of General Conditions of the FIDIC White Book by using the Delphi technique. A panel of 40 experts with more than 10 years of experience and expertise in overseas construction services agreements and FIDIC White Book was formed, and the reliability was improved in the direction of increasing the consensus of experts through a total of three Delphi survey processes. In the first Delphi survey, a closed-type survey was conducted on the impact of risk among 63 Sub-Clauses of General Conditions on a Likert 5-point scale, and 26 main risk Sub-Clauses were derived. The Content Validity of the results of the first Delphi survey was verified with the CVR value. In the 2nd and 3rd Delphi surveys, a closed-type survey was conducted on a Likert 10-point scale for 26 main risk Sub-Clauses and the risk possibility and impact of each main risk Sub-Clause were evaluated. The reliability of the 3rd Delphi survey result was verified with the COV value. Total 14 Key Risk Sub-Clauses were derived by applying the average risk possibility and impact of each of the 26 main risk Sub-Clauses to the PI Risk Matrix. The results of deriving Key Risk Sub-Clauses showed that agreement on specific scope of service, delay management, and change management were the most important. As a result of this study, from a practical point of view, consultants of consulting companies provide guidelines that should be reviewed to minimize contractual risks when signing service contracts with clients. From an academic point of view, the direction of research on deriving key risks related to service contracts for consultants participating in overseas construction is presented.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. An B.H., Kim, J.E., and Kim, Y.S. (2013). "The analysis of the weights of country risk by participants of overseas construction projects." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 14(2), pp. 150-159. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2013.14.2.150
  2. Bailey, J., Turrini, M., Robottom, L., and Duncan, C. (2017). "The new FIDIC White Book for Consultancy Services." White & Case Client Alert / Construction.
  3. Construction Industry Institute (CII) (2004). International project risk management: A management approach, Research Summary 181-1, Austin, TX: CII.
  4. Dalkey, N.C. (1969). "An experimental study of group opinion: The Delphi method." Futures, pp. 408-426.
  5. Hyun, H.B. (2016). "Identification of Contractual Risk Factors for Application in the Overseas Construction Projects based on FIDIC Red Book 1999 Edition." Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research, KSCE, 36(6), pp. 1153-1160.
  6. Hong, S.Y., Jei, J.Y., Seo, S.C., and Park, H.K. (2022). "Deriving Key Risk Sub-Clauses of FIDIC Conditions of Standard Subcontract -Based on FIDIC Conditions of Subcontract for Construction, edition 2011-" Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research, KSCE, 42(3), pp. 439-448.
  7. International Contractors Association of Korea (ICAK) (2022). Overseas Construction Comprehensive Information Service,Contract award statistics by construction business type, ICAK Website.
  8. International Federation of Consulting Engineers (2017). Client/Consultant Model Services Agreement, FIDIC, Geneva,Switzerland.
  9. Kim, B.S. (1996a). The Educational Method, Hakjisa, p. 498.
  10. Kim, D.I. (2018a). "Comparison Between FIDIC White Book and Ministry of Strategy and Finance (MOSF) General Conditions on Service Contract." Local Contract Research, KALGC, 9(1), pp. 41-68.
  11. Kim, D.S. (2018b). "A Study on the Improvement of General Conditions in Public Engineering Service Contract." Local Contract Research, KALGC, 9(1), pp. 21-40.
  12. Kim, H.S. (1996b). Forecasting methodologies and utilization of science and technology research, STEPI, p.148.
  13. Kim, J.H., Kim, C.Y., Lee, S.S., and Lee, J.H. (2017). "A Study on Influence Factors for Tunnel Collapse Risk Analysis using Delphi Method." The Journal of Engineering Geology, KSEG, 27(2), pp. 165-172.
  14. Lawshe, C.H. (1975). "A Quantative approach to content validity." Personnel Psychology, 28(4), pp. 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  15. Mulcahy, R. (2003). "Risk management-tricks of the trade for project manager." RMC Publication, Inc., Minnesota, USA, pp. 105-121.
  16. Raj, S., Hillig J.B., Hughes, W. (2009). "Responsiveness to change by Standard-form contract drafters in the construction industry-A Case study of the FIDIC White Book." International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 1(3), pp. 205-220.
  17. Rho, S.Y. (2006). "Delphi Technique : Forecasting the future by technical insight." Planning and Policy, KRIHS, 299, pp. 53-62.
  18. Tochaiwat, K., and Chovichien, V. (2003). The Applicability of Construction Client/Consultant Form of Agreement in Thai Public Construction Projects, conference paper, The Ninth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction (EASEC9).
  19. Yoo, W.H. (2011). "Contractual Risk Evaluation Model for International Construction Projects using FIDIC Silver Book." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 27(11), pp. 159-168.