한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

도서관 ESG 경영평가지표 개발에 관한 연구

A Study on the Development of ESG Management Evaluation Index for Library

  • 노영희 (건국대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2023.01.16
  • 심사 : 2023.02.15
  • 발행 : 2023.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

사회적·환경적 이슈에 대한 인식이 증가함에 따라 ESG 경영에 대한 관심이 높아지고, ESG 경영평가의 영향력은 점점 더 강해지고 있으며, 도서관도 ESG 경영평가에 참여할 필요가 있다. ESG 경영을 도서관에 적용하기 위해서는 도서관에 적용 가능한 ESG 경영을 정의하고 범주를 확인한 후, 먼저 적용과 지속적인 환류를 전제로 평가지표 개발이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 기업을 포함하여 공공기관 ESG 경영평가지표를 포괄적으로 살펴보고 이로부터 도서관에 적용가능한 ESG 경영평가지표를 제안하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 ESG 관련 선행연구 조사·분석, 선행연구 기반 도서관 ESG 예비경영평가지표 도출, 예비경영평가지표에 대한 전문가 FGI 의견 수렴, 전문가 FGI 의견 수렴 기반 1차 도서관 ESG 경영평가지표 개발, 1차 도서관 ESG 경영평가지표의 적합도 조사과정을 거쳤다. 최종적으로 환경 영역은 총 25개 항목, 사회 영역은 총 56개 항목, 지배구조 영역은 총 32개 항목을 선정하였다. 향후 연구에서는 이 지표를 기반으로 도서관을 대상으로 ESG 경영평가를 수행할 필요가 있다고 본다.

As awareness of social and environmental issues increases due to the gust of ESG management, interest in ESG management is increasing, and the influence of ESG evaluation is getting stronger, and libraries need to participate in ESG management evaluation. In order to apply ESG management to libraries, library ESG evaluation indicators must be developed. Therefore, this study attempted to comprehensively examine ESG management evaluation indicators of public institutions, including companies, and propose ESG management evaluation indicators applicable to libraries. To this end, it went through the process of investigating and analyzing ESG-related prior research, deriving preliminary evaluation indicators for libraries, collecting expert FGI opinions, developing primary library ESG evaluation indicators based on expert FGI opinions, and) examining the suitability of primary library ESG evaluation indicators. Finally, a total of 25 items were selected in the environmental area, a total of 56 items in the social area, and a total of 32 items in the governance area. In future studies, it is necessary to conduct ESG management evaluation for libraries based on this indicator.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Byun, Young-Jo & Woo, Seung-Han (2022). Research trend on ESG management of corporation. Clean Technology, 28(2), 193-20. https://doi.org/10.7464/ksct.2022.28.2.193 
  2. Hwang, Su-Deok, Kim, Hee-Beom, & Lee, Young-Jae (2022). A study on the improvement of evaluation system for ESG management in public institutions. Journal of the Korean Society of Cadastre, 38(2), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.22988/ksc.2022.38.2.008 
  3. Jeong, Geyo-Un (2022). A study on the development of consumer based ESG Scale. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Business Administration, Graduate School of Chosun University. http://chosun.dcollection.net/public_resource/pdf/200000638437_20230109025849.pdf 
  4. Joint Government Offices (2021). K-ESG Guidelines V1.0. Sejong: Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. 
  5. Kang, Won & Jung, Moo-Kwon (2020). Effect of ESG activities and firm's financial characteristics. Korean Journal of Final Studies, 49(5), 681-707. https://doi.org/10.26845/KJFS.2020.10.49.5.681 
  6. Kim, Eun-Hye & Ma, Hee-Young (2020). A study on the value relevance of corporate sustainability management. Review of Accounting and Policy Studies, 2020 25(2), 251-277. https://doi.org/10.21737/RAPS.2020.05.25.2.251 
  7. Kim, Ik-Seung (2022). ESG management status and strategic implications of Korean retailers. Koreanische Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften, 40(3), 43-61.  https://doi.org/10.18237/KDGW.2022.40.3.043
  8. Kim, Ji-Yeon (2021). A Study on ESG Evaluation Indicators for Corporate-led Public Design. Master's thesis, Public Design Major, The Graduate School of Industrial Arts Hongik University. https://dcoll.hongik.ac.kr/public_resource/pdf/000000027508_20230109021533.pdf 
  9. Korea Economic Daily (2021). ESG Concept to Practice: K Corporate Survival Plan. Seoul: Korea Economic Daily. 
  10. KPMG (2021). ESG management, corporate answers for a sustainable world and business. SAMJONG KPMG Newsletter. 
  11. Lee, Jeong-Ki & Rhee, Jay-Hyuk (2020). Current status and future directions of research on sustainable management: focusing on the ESG measurement index. Journal of Strategic Management, 23(2), 65-92. https://doi.org/10.17786/jsm.2020.23.2.06 
  12. Lee, Ji-Hye (2022). A study on the necessity of promoting ESG management of SMEs through empirical analysis of ESG ratings. The Journal of Humanties and Social Sciences 21, 13(2), 2787-2802. http://dx.doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.13.2.195 
  13. LEE. Jeong-Seon (2021). A successful case of ESG response by foreign companies(Global Market Report; 21-026). KOSTA, Office of Trade and Cooperation. 
  14. Lim, Hyung-Chul & Jung, Moo-Sup (2021). Strategies to expand SMEs ESG management through Domestic and Foreign ESG Cases. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business, 12(4), 179-192. https://doi.org/10.32599/apjb.12.4.202112.179 
  15. Lim, Jong-Ok (2016). Effects of business value of ESG evaluation information and earnings management. Korean Business Education Review, 31(1), 111-139. 
  16. Oh, Seo-Pyeong (2022. 3. 5.). ESG 101 Feat. Zelkova Library for Entrepreneurs. Slowly and calmly. Available: https://blog.naver.com/slowpeaceful/222664254913 
  17. SEE (2022.7.20). Small library in Namsan Library_Lotte Home Shopping Signed a business agreement for resource circulation and ESG management practice. Availavle: https://blog.naver.com/tdp0806/222744234548 
  18. Sejong the Law Firm (2022). The main contents and implications of the new government's national agenda. Seoul: Sejong the Law Firm. 
  19. Stella. (2022. 6. 12.) ESG Management Company Case SK Telecom Introduction: Meaning, necessity, etc. Dreaming PositivityStella. Available: https://m.blog.naver.com/greenher/222770101308 
  20. Suh, Yong-Gu & Kim, Ta-mmy (2022). A study on coupang's ESG management: centering on rocket delivery. Journal of Product Research, 40(1), 67-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.36345/kacst.2022.40.1.009 
  21. Suk, Jeong-Il (2021). A study on the influence of ESG indicators on the continuous socially responsible investment of financial consumers. Doctoral dissertation, Major of Asset Management Service, Graduate School of Service Business Kyonggi University. http://dcollection.kyonggi.ac.kr/public_resource/pdf/000000056255_20230109024543.pdf 
  22. Sustinvest (2021). Sustin Best Company ESG Analysis Report. Seoul: Sustinvest. 
  23. Keller, S. (2015). Chancen und Grenzen von ESG-Rating. University of Zurich.
  24. Knecht, F. & S. Reich (2014). Wertschopfungsketten: ESG als kritischer Erfolgsfaktor fur das Management des gesamten Lebenszyklus, in CSR und Finance: Beitrag und Rolle des CFO fur eine Nachhaltige Unternehmensfuhrung.
  25. Mayer, K. (2017). Nachhaltigkeit: 111 Fragen und Antworten: Nachschlagewerk zur Umsetzung von CSR im Unternehmen. Springer Gabler.
  26. Schaltegger, S. & J. Horisch (2017), In search of the dominant rationale in sustainability management: legitimacy-or profit-seeking?. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 259-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2854-3
  27. Sparkes, R. & Cowton, C. J. (2004). The maturing of socially responsible investment: a review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 52, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033106.43260.99
  28. WCED, S. W. S. (1987), World commission on environment and development. Our Common Future, 17(1), 1-91.
  29. Werner, G. & Romeike, F. (2020). ESG-Risiken und ihre Quantifizierung. in Social Credit Rating: Reputation und Vertrauen Beurteilen. 
  30. Windolph, S. E. (2013). Assessing corporate sustainability through ratings: challenges and their causes. Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 37-57.