DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Model of Artificial Intelligence in Cyber Security of SCADA to Enhance Public Safety in UAE

  • Received : 2023.02.05
  • Published : 2023.02.28

Abstract

The UAE government has set its sights on creating a smart, electronic-based government system that utilizes AI. The country's collaboration with India aims to bring substantial returns through AI innovation, with a target of over $20 billion in the coming years. To achieve this goal, the UAE launched its AI strategy in 2017, focused on improving performance in key sectors and becoming a leader in AI investment. To ensure public safety as the role of AI in government grows, the country is working on developing integrated cyber security solutions for SCADA systems. A questionnaire-based study was conducted, using the AI IQ Threat Scale to measure the variables in the research model. The sample consisted of 200 individuals from the UAE government, private sector, and academia, and data was collected through online surveys and analyzed using descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling. The results indicate that the AI IQ Threat Scale was effective in measuring the four main attacks and defense applications of AI. Additionally, the study reveals that AI governance and cyber defense have a positive impact on the resilience of AI systems. This study makes a valuable contribution to the UAE government's efforts to remain at the forefront of AI and technology exploitation. The results emphasize the need for appropriate evaluation models to ensure a resilient economy and improved public safety in the face of automation. The findings can inform future AI governance and cyber defense strategies for the UAE and other countries.

Keywords

References

  1. Government.ae, 'UAE strategy for artificial intelligence.', 2017.
  2. E. Wilson, 'Artificial Intelligence and Human Security: AI Strategy Analysis', 2019.
  3. 2018 Ryan, P., 'The UAE will save billions thanks to artificial intelligence, says AI minister'.
  4. E. Azar and M. A. N. Haddad, 'Artificial Intelligence in the Gulf: Prospects and Challenges', 2019.
  5. 2016 Government of Dubai, 'AI and Robotics Award for good', 2016.
  6. J. Ahokas, 'Secure and Reliable Communications Solution for SCADA and PPDR Use', 2013.
  7. A. RULE and Y. G. WORKFLOW, 'TOGETHER AT LAST'.
  8. T. Macaulay and B. L. Singer, Cybersecurity for industrial control systems: SCADA, DCS, PLC, HMI, and SIS. CRC Press, 2011.
  9. U. P. D. Ani, H. He, and A. Tiwari, 'Review of cybersecurity issues in industrial critical infrastructure: manufacturing in perspective', J. Cyber Secur. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 32-74, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/23742917.2016.1252211
  10. X. You, C. Zhang, X. Tan, S. Jin, and H. Wu, 'AI for 5G: Research directions and paradigms', arXiv, pp. 1-12, 2018, doi: 10.1360/n112018-00174.
  11. P. Dickens, Capital and the Cosmos: War, Society and the Quest for Profit. Springer Nature, 2023.
  12. A. Aloisi and V. De Stefano, 'Between risk mitigation and labour rights enforcement: assessing the transatlantic race to govern AI-driven decision-making through a comparative lens', Eur. Labour Law J., 2023.
  13. C. Ganguli, S. K. Shandilya, M. Nehrey, and M. Havryliuk, 'Adaptive Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Nature-Inspired Cyber Defense', Systems, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 27, 2023.
  14. T. Mazhar et al., 'Analysis of Challenges and Solutions of IoT in Smart Grids Using AI and Machine Learning Techniques: A Review', Electronics, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 242, 2023.
  15. P. Hazell, P. Novitzky, and S. van den Oord, 'Socio-technical system analysis of responsible data sharing in water systems as critical infrastructure', Front. Big Data, vol. 5, 2023.
  16. R. C. Swallow, 'Considering the cost of cyber warfare: advancing cyber warfare analytics to better assess tradeoffs in system destruction warfare', J. Def. Model. Simul., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 3-37, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/15485129221114354
  17. M. Halaweh, 'Artificial intelligence government (Gov. 3.0): The UAE leading model', J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 62, pp. 269-272, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11210
  18. F. Liu, Y. Liu, and Y. Shi, 'Three IQs of AI systems and their testing methods', J. Eng., vol. 2020, no. 13, pp. 566-571, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1049/joe.2019.1135
  19. P. Shah et al., 'Artificial intelligence and machine learning in clinical development: a translational perspective', NPJ Digit. Med., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 69, 2019.
  20. A. Dafoe, 'AI governance: a research agenda', Gov. AI Program, Futur. Humanit. Institute, Univ. Oxford Oxford, UK, vol. 1442, p. 1443, 2018.
  21. K. Grace-Martin, 'Can Likert scale data ever be continuous', Artic. Alley, 2008.
  22. M. Jouini, L. B. A. Rabai, and A. Ben Aissa, 'Classification of security threats in information systems', Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 32, pp. 489-496, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.452
  23. M. AlHashmi, G. Chhipi-Shrestha, K. M. Nahiduzzaman, K. Hewage, and R. Sadiq, 'Framework for Developing a Low-Carbon Energy Demand in Residential Buildings Using Community-Government Partnership: An Application in Saudi Arabia', Energies, vol. 14, no. 16, p. 4954, 2021.