Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Derivation of Data Demand through Analysis of Agreed Terms and Conditions on Environmental Impact Assessment - Focusing on the Water Environment -

환경영향평가 협의 내용 분석을 통한 데이터 수요 도출방안 - 수환경 분야를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2022.10.17
  • Accepted : 2023.01.03
  • Published : 2023.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The need for improvement is raised due to limitations with environmental impact assessment, and the importance for data-based environmental impact assessment is increasing. In this study, data demand was derived by analyzing Agreed Terms and Conditions in the Water Environment field (Water Quality, Hydraulic & Hydrologic Conditions, and Marine Environment) of environmental impact assessment. Agreed Terms and Conditions on environmental impact assessment in the water environment field were classified and categorized by environmental impact assessment stage (addition to status survey, impact prediction and evaluation, establishment of reduction measures, post-environmental impact survey), and data demand for each type of consultation opinion was linked. As a result of the categorization of Agreed Terms and Conditions, it was classified into 18 types in the water quality, 15 types in the hydraulic & hydrologic conditions, and 17 types in the marine environment. As a result of linking data demand, the total number of data demand was 236 in the water quality, 98 in the hydraulic & hydrologic conditions, and 73 in the marine environment. The highest number of Agreed Terms and Conditions and data demands were found in the water quality for the evaluation item and establishment of reduction measures, specifically establishment of non-point source pollution reduction measures, for the stage. The numbers were judged to be linked to the relative importance of the items and the primary purpose of environmental impact assessment. The derivation of data demand through the analysis of Agreed Terms and Conditions in the environmental impact assessment can contribute to the advancement of the preparation of environmental impact assessment reports and is expected to increase data utilization by various decision-makers by establishing a systematic database.

환경영향평가에 대한 문제점으로 인한 개선 필요성이 제기되고, 데이터 기반의 환경영향평가의 중요성이 증가하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 환경영향평가의 수환경 분야(수질, 수리·수문, 해양환경)의 협의 내용 분석을 통해 데이터 수요를 도출하였다. 수환경 분야의 환경영향평가 협의 내용 총 400건(4,180문장)을 평가항목(수질, 수리수문, 해양환경) 및 환경영향평가 단계(현황조사 추가, 영향예측 및 평가, 저감대책 수립, 사후환경영향조사)별로 분류 후 유형화하였고, 해당하는 협의 내용 유형 별 데이터 수요를 연계하였다. 협의 내용 유형화 결과 수질 분야 18개, 수리·수문 분야 14개, 해양환경 분야 17개의 유형으로 분류되었으며, 데이터 수요 연계 결과 수질 분야 254개, 수리·수문 분야 102개, 해양환경 분야 74개의 데이터 수요가 도출되었다. 평가항목으로는 수질 분야, 환경영향평가 단계 상으로는 저감대책 수립 분야에서의 협의 내용 유형 및 데이터 수요가 가장 높은 빈도로 나타났으며, 세부 협의 내용 유형으로는 비점오염 저감 대책이 가장 많은 빈도로 나타났다. 이는 항목의 상대적 중요도와, 환경영향평가의 주요 목적과 연계된 것으로 판단되었다. 환경영향평가 협의 내용 분석을 통한 데이터 수요의 도출은 환경영향평가서 작성의 고도화에 기여할 수 있으며, 환경영향평가 데이터 체계화를 통해 다양한 의사결정자의 데이터 활용도를 높일 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 결과물은 환경부의 재원으로 한국환경산업기술원의 ICT기반 환경영향평가 의사결정 지원 기술개발사업의 지원을 받아 연구되었습니다(2020002990009).

References

  1. Ban YU, Joo KS, Jeong HK, Hwang GH. 2010. Improvement of EIS Documentation and Counsultation Process through Expert Survey Method. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 19(2): 141-151. [Korean Literature]
  2. Chang H, Jeon HJ. 2013. The Improvement for Geo-spatial Information Utilization of Environment Impact Assessment Supporting System. Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science 21(1): 45-52. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.7319/kogsis.2013.21.1.045
  3. Cho NW, Maeng JH, Lee MJ. 2017. Use of Environmental Geospatial Information to Support Environmental Impact Assessment Follow-Up Management. Korea Journal of Remote Sensing 33(5-3): 799-807. [Korean Literature]
  4. Choi YY, Cho HJ, Hwang JH, Kim YJ, Lim NO, Lee JY, Lee JH, Sung MJ, Jeon SW, Sung HC. 2021. Complaint-based Data Demands for Advancement of Environmental Impact Assessment. 2021. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 24(6): 49-65. [Korean Literature]
  5. Jang JY, Cho NW, Lee MJ. 2019. Standardization Plan for Activation of Environmental Impact Assessment based on Spatial Information. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing 35(3): 433-446. [Korean Literature]
  6. Jeon JC, Jung JH, Kim YS, Kim LH. 2018. A Review of Research Trend Related to NPS and Suggestion for Research Direction in the Future. Journal of Wetlands Research 20(1): 80-93. [Korean Literature]
  7. Jung BG. 2009. A Note on the Problems and Alternative Improvement of Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea - Evaluation in an Engineer's Viewpoint. Public Law Journal 10(2): 327-349. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.31779/plj.10.2.200906.013
  8. Kim JO, Joo YJ. 2021. Review of Environmental Impact Assessment Re-consulting System - A Comparative Analysis of Korea and Foreign Countries. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 30(5): 328-338. [Korean Literature]
  9. Kim MK, Lee SD. 2021. Survey on the Perception of Stakeholders on the EIA System in Korea. Journal of Environment Impact Assessment 30(1): 49-60. [Korean Literature]
  10. Korea Environment Corporation. 2020. Watershed Management Manual. Korea Environment Corporation. [Korean Literature]
  11. Lee GG, Lee SH, Kim GH, Lee JH. 2011. Improve of Biotope-Area-Ratio-IndiAtor and Appraisal System AppliAble to Environmental Impact Assessment Projects. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 14(5): 113-125. [Korean Literature]
  12. Lee MC. 2000. A study on the History and the Future Improvement of Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 9(1): 47-59. [Korean Literature]
  13. Ministry of Environment. 2020. The first Master Plans for National Water Management. Ministry of Environment. [Korean Literature]
  14. Park JH, Choi JG. 2018. A study on the Improvement of the EIA Items and the Operating System Based on the Analysis of EIA Item Usage. Journal of Environment Impact Assessment 27(1): 1-16. [Korean Literature]
  15. Park SJ, Lee DK, Jeong SG. 2021. A study on the Land-Use Related Assessment Factors in Korean Environmental Impact Assessment. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 30(5): 297-304. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2021.30.5.297
  16. Yang JH, Park SH, Kim TH, Hwang SI. 2016. Study on the soil related assessment factors in Korean Environmental Impact Assessment. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 25(1): 41-50. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2016.25.1.41
  17. Yi YK, Yi PI. 1997. Content Analysis of Mitigation Measures in Environmental Impact Statement. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 6(2): 165-180. [Korean Literature]
  18. Yu JE, Kim YJ, Sung HC, Lee KI, Choi JY, Jeon SW. 2020. Method for Calculating the Pollution Load Amount of Agricultural Non-Point Sources Using Land Cover Map. Journal of Environmental Science International 29(12): 1249-1260. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2020.29.12.1249