한국환경생태학회지 (Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology)

  • 제37권6호
  • /
  • Pages.499-507
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1229-3857(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-131X(eISSN)
한국환경생태학회 (Korean Society of Environment and Ecology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

북한산국립공원 내 토지매수 청구 제도 활용 요인 분석

Analyzing Factors Affecting the Use of Landowner's Purchase Requisition Policy in Bukhansan National Park

  • 투고 : 2023.08.29
  • 심사 : 2023.11.13
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 토지매수 청구 제도에 의한 국립공원 내 사유지 매수 현황을 분석하여, 토지매수 청구 제도의 유용성과 한계, 정책 시사점을 도출하였다. 토지매수 청구 제도가 도입된 2006년부터 2021년까지 국가가 매수한 사유지 데이터를 활용하여, 토지 소유자의 매수 청구 결정에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 로지스틱 회귀분석을 통해 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 사유지의 지목이 임야이고, 사유지 면적 중 공원자연보존지구 면적이 높으며, 공원 경계까지 거리가 멀고, 단위면적당 공시지가가 낮은 사유지가 매수 청구에 의해 매수될 확률이 높았다. 이 결과는 토지 소유자 관점에서 보면 재산권 행사가 어려운 사유지일수록 매수 청구될 확률이 높다는 뜻이고, 공원 관리자의 관점에서 보면 보전 가치가 높은 사유지가 매수 청구될 확률이 높다는 의미이다. 즉, 토지매수 청구 제도를 활용하여 사유지 매수를 진행해도 보전가치가 높은 토지를 매수할 수 있어, 높은 자연환경 보전 효과를 기대할 수 있다. 로지스틱 회귀모형은 또한 북한산국립공원 내 사유지 중 401m2의 사유지가 향후 매수 청구될 확률이 높을 것으로 예측하였다. 토지매수 청구 제도는 국립공원 내 토지 소유자의 민원 해소에 효과적인 제도임에도 현재 활용도가 매우 낮은데, 본 연구에서는 실증 분석 결과를 바탕으로 제도의 활용도를 높일 수 있는 정책 방안을 제시하였다.

This study conducted an empirical analysis on a land purchase requisition policy in Bukhansan National Park to draw the efficacy, limitations and implications of this policy. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors that affected the landowners' decision on applying for land purchase requisition using the government's records on acquisition of private lands in the park since 2006 when this policy began to be implemented. Results illustrate that the probability that a landowner applied for purchase requisition increased if the land was classified as forest, if a large proportion of the land was designated as the nature conservation district, if it was located farther from park boundary, and if it had higher appraised value per square meter. These results indicate that as the landowners had less chance to utilize their lands, they more likely apply for purchase requisition. These results also imply that the government can achieve a high conservation performance level if private lands are acquire by the land acquisition requisition policy. The logistic regression model also predict that 401m2 of the private lands in Bukhansan National Park will likely be purchase-requested in future. Despites its usefulness in mitigating landowners' complaints in national parks, the land purchase requisition policy has not been widely utilized. Based on these empirical results, this study provides policy implications to facilitate the ulitization of this policy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho, W.(2019) Development impact based on area adjustment of feasibility review in Bukhansan National Park planning. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 35: 305-312. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2021.35.3.305
  2. Cho, W., K.S. Ki, K.K. Oh, D.P. Kim, C.Y. Sung and S.G. Park(2014) A strategy for adopting a national park conservation agreement to enhance management partnership with local communities. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology Conference 42: 115-116. (in Korean with English abstract)
  3. Choi, H.J.(2018) A study on the system of purchase claim rights on the real estate public law. Ilkam Real Estate Law Review 16: 201-231. (in Korean with English abstract)
  4. Choi, Y.B.(2001) A comparative study of Korea and U.S. on the national park management-Focused on the facility development and property conflicts in the national park jurisdiction-. Korean Institute of Forest Recreation and Welfare 5: 85-93.
  5. Cox, D.R.(1958) The regression analysis of binary sequences. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodo logical) 20: 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1958.tb00292.x
  6. Disselhoff, T.(2015) Alternative ways to support private land conservation report to the European Commission. Ref. No. E.3-PO/07.020300/2015/ENV, European Commission, Berlin, German, 72pp.
  7. Gujarati, D.(2004) Basic econometrics(4th ed.). McGrow, Boston, United States, 1002pp.
  8. Jeon, K.C., J. Nam and W. Cho(2018) Effect of land use change and price from the area adjustment of national park in Korea-A case study of Woraksan National Park-. Korean Journal of Environ ment and Ecology 32: 639-645. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2018.32.6.639
  9. Kim, H. and S.I. Choi(2016) A study on trouble-shooting of issue of private land within Mudeungsan National Park in Korea-Focused on the pasture site-. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 21: 17-26. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.34272/forest.2017.21.1.002
  10. Kim, J.M., G.G. Lee and S.H. Jo(2005) Alternative solutions to mitigate conflicts on private land for reasonable management of national parks in Korea. Journal of Korea Planning Association 40: 47-57. (in Korean with English abstract)
  11. Kim, M.Y., N.H. Kim, K.T. Lee and J.C. Shin(2020) A study on the price determinants of forest land. Journal of the Residential Environment Institute of Korea 18: 35-48. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.22313/reik.2020.18.1.35
  12. Korea Environment Institute(2022) A study on reforming a private land management policy in national parks. Korea Environment Institute, Sejong, Korea, 167pp. (in Korean)
  13. Korea National Park Service(2020a) Making a mid- and long-term plan for acquisition of private lands in core areas in national parks: A final report. Korea National Park Service, Wonju, Korea, 251pp. (in Korean)
  14. Korea National Park Service(2020b) 2020 national park basic statistics. Korea National Park Service, Wonju, Korea, 225pp. (in Korean)
  15. Korea National Park Service(2023) 2023 national park basic statistics. Korea National Park Service, Wonju, Korea, 220pp. (in Korean)
  16. Lambert Jr, J.F.(1986) Private landholdings in the national parks: Examples from Yosemite National Park and Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Harvard Environmental Law Review 6: 35-60.
  17. Lee, J.S.H. and C.O. Oh(2021) Effects of the perceived trustworthi ness of the government and connectedness to nature on payments for ecosystem services: A case study of national parks in South Korea. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 36: 10446.
  18. Sax, J.L.(1980) Buying scenery: Land acquisitions for the national park service. Duke Law Journal 1980: 709-740. https://doi.org/10.2307/1372277
  19. Yoon, I.(2022) Trends and implications of the amendment of the legislation on conservation of natural environment-Focusing on the discussion of biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services-. Environmental Law Review 44: 33-59.