DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

HPAI-resistant Ri chickens exhibit elevated antiviral immune-related gene expression

  • Thi Hao Vu (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Jubi Heo (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Yeojin Hong (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Suyeon Kang (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Ha Thi Thanh Tran (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research) ;
  • Hoang Vu Dang (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research) ;
  • Anh Duc Truong (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research) ;
  • Yeong Ho Hong (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University)
  • Received : 2022.09.16
  • Accepted : 2022.12.05
  • Published : 2023.01.31

Abstract

Background: Highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIVs) is an extremely contagious and high mortality rates in chickens resulting in substantial economic impact on the poultry sector. Therefore, it is necessary to elucidate the pathogenic mechanism of HPAIV for infection control. Objective: Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) can effectively avoid the limitations of subjective screening for differential gene expression. Therefore, we performed GSEA to compare HPAI-infected resistant and susceptible Ri chicken lines. Methods: The Ri chickens Mx(A)/BF2(B21) were chosen as resistant, and the chickens Mx(G)/BF2(B13) were selected as susceptible by genotyping the Mx and BF2 genes. The tracheal tissues of HPAIV H5N1 infected chickens were collected for RNA sequencing followed by GSEA analysis to define gene subsets to elucidate the sequencing results. Results: We identified four differentially expressed pathways, which were immune-related pathways with a total of 78 genes. The expression levels of cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12), chemokines (CCL4 and CCL5), type interferons and their receptors (IFN-β, IFNAR1, IFNAR2, and IFNGR1), Jak-STAT signaling pathway genes (STAT1, STAT2, and JAK1), MHC class I and II and their co-stimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86, CD40, DMB2, BLB2, and B2M), and interferon stimulated genes (EIF2AK2 and EIF2AK1) in resistant chickens were higher than those in susceptible chickens. Conclusions: Resistant Ri chickens exhibit a stronger antiviral response to HPAIV H5N1 compared with susceptible chickens. Our findings provide insights into the immune responses of genetically disparate chickens against HPAIV.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the "Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development" (Project No. PJ015612), Rural Development Administration, and Chung-Ang University Graduate Research Scholarship in 2021, Republic of Korea.

References

  1. Sanchez Rojas O, Pizarro Medina K, Obschatko E, Estefanell G, Mora Blancas E, Urbina A. OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Paris: World Organisation for Animal Health; 2014.
  2. Kabir SML. Avian flu (H5N1): Threat of "global pandemic" is growing and it's impact on the developing countries' economy. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2010;4:1192-1194.
  3. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(43):15545-15550. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102
  4. Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn923
  5. Shi J, Walker MG. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) for interpreting gene expression profiles. Curr Bioinform. 2007;2(2):133-137. https://doi.org/10.2174/157489307780618231
  6. Vu TH, Hong Y, Truong AD, Lee J, Lee S, Song KD, et al. Cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions in the highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus-infected lungs of genetically disparate Ri chicken lines. Anim Biosci. 2022;35(3):367-376. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0163
  7. Grimm D, Staeheli P, Hufbauer M, Koerner I, Martinez-Sobrido L, Solorzano A, et al. Replication fitness determines high virulence of influenza A virus in mice carrying functional Mx1 resistance gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(16):6806-6811. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701849104
  8. Lee SH, Vidal SM. Functional diversity of Mx proteins: variations on a theme of host resistance to infection. Genome Res. 2002;12(4):527-530. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.20102
  9. Seyama T, Ko JH, Ohe M, Sasaoka N, Okada A, Gomi H, et al. Population research of genetic polymorphism at amino acid position 631 in chicken Mx protein with differential antiviral activity. Biochem Genet. 2006;44(9-10):437-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-006-9040-3
  10. Boonyanuwat K, Thummabutra S, Sookmanee N, Vatchavalkhu V, Siripholvat V, Mitsuhashi T. Influences of MHC Class II haplotypes on avian influenza traits in Thai indigenous chicken. J Poult Sci. 2006;43(2):120-125. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.43.120
  11. Vu TH, Hong Y, Truong AD, Lee S, Heo J, Lillehoj HS, et al. The highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus induces the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway in the trachea of two Ri chicken lines. Anim Biosci. 2022;35(7):964-974. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0420
  12. Lee J, Hong Y, Vu TH, Lee S, Heo J, Truong AD, et al. Influenza A pathway analysis of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1) infection in genetically disparate Ri chicken lines. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2022;246:110404.
  13. Iwasaki A, Pillai PS. Innate immunity to influenza virus infection. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(5):315-328. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3665
  14. Wei L, Jiao P, Yuan R, Song Y, Cui P, Guo X, et al. Goose Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7), myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) and antiviral molecules involved in anti-H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus response. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2013;153(1-2):99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2013.02.012
  15. Loo YM, Gale M Jr. Immune signaling by RIG-I-like receptors. Immunity. 2011;34(5):680-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2011.05.003
  16. Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell. 2010;140(6):805-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022
  17. Swain SL, McKinstry KK, Strutt TM. Expanding roles for CD4+ T cells in immunity to viruses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(2):136-148. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3152
  18. Barjesteh N, Abdelaziz KT, Sharif S. The role of IRF7 and NF-κB pathways in the induction of antiviral responses in chicken tracheal epithelial cells following exposure to TLR3 and 4 ligands. J Immunol. 2016;196(Suppl 1):216.8.
  19. Randall RE, Goodbourn S. Interferons and viruses: an interplay between induction, signalling, antiviral responses and virus countermeasures. J Gen Virol. 2008;89(Pt 1):1-47. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.83391-0
  20. De Silva Senapathi U, Abdul-Cader MS, Amarasinghe A, van Marle G, Czub M, Gomis S, et al. The in ovo delivery of CpG oligonucleotides protects against infectious bronchitis with the recruitment of immune cells into the respiratory tract of chickens. Viruses. 2018;10(11):635.
  21. Garcia MA, Gil J, Ventoso I, Guerra S, Domingo E, Rivas C, et al. Impact of protein kinase PKR in cell biology: from antiviral to antiproliferative action. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70(4):1032-1060. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00027-06