Animal Bioscience

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of supplementation and withdrawal of selenium-enriched kale sprouts on productivity and egg selenium concentration of laying hens

  • Anut Chantiratikul (Applied Animal and Aquatic Sciences Research Unit and Department of Agricultural Technology, Faculty of Technology, Mahasarakham University ) ;
  • Pinyada Thongpitak (Applied Animal and Aquatic Sciences Research Unit and Department of Agricultural Technology, Faculty of Technology, Mahasarakham University ) ;
  • Orawan Arunsangseesod (Applied Animal and Aquatic Sciences Research Unit and Department of Agricultural Technology, Faculty of Technology, Mahasarakham University ) ;
  • Eakapol Wangkahart (Applied Animal and Aquatic Sciences Research Unit and Department of Agricultural Technology, Faculty of Technology, Mahasarakham University ) ;
  • Kwanyuen Leamsamrong (Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University) ;
  • Worapol Aengwanich (Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Mahasarakham University) ;
  • Juan Boo Liang (Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Wu Xin (CAS Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Piyanete Chantiratikul (Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University)
  • Received : 2022.02.22
  • Accepted : 2022.08.22
  • Published : 2023.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this trial was to investigate the effect of supplementation and withdrawal of selenium-enriched kale sprouts (SeKS) on productivity and egg Se concentration of laying hens. Selenium from commercial Se-enriched yeast (SeY) was used as a comparative Se source. Methods: One-hundred and eighty 61-week-old laying hens were randomly divided into 5 treatment groups with 4 replicates (9 hens each) in a 2×2+1 Augmented Factorial Experiment in a completely randomized design. The experimental diets were basal diet, basal diet supplemented with 0.2 and 0.4 mg Se/kg from SeKS and SeY, respectively. The 8-week feeding trial was divided into 2 periods, namely the Se supplemental period (week 1 to 4) and the Se withdrawal period (week 5 to 8). Results: Productive performance, egg quality and egg Se concentration of laying hens were not affected by sources of Se (SeKS and SeY) during both, the Se supplemental and withdrawal periods. Egg production and egg Se concentration increased (p<0.05) with increasing levels of Se supplementation. The egg Se concentration increased and reached a peak 1 week after Se supplementation. However, concentration of Se in eggs of hens fed Se from both sources decreased rapidly from the second week of the Se withdrawal period to reach the same egg Se concentration of hens fed the basal diet by the fourth week of the Se withdrawal period. Conclusion: The efficacy of Se from SeKS on productivity and egg Se concentration in laying hens was comparable to commercial SeY. Thus, SeKS can provide an alternate organic Se source for production of Se-enriched eggs.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research project was financially supported by Mahasarakham University. The authors are grateful to Phytobiotics Feed Additive GmbH for providing Se-enriched yeast (Cytoplex-Se 2000), and the Key Collaborative Research Program of the Alliance of International Science Organizations for academic collaboration (ANSO-CR-KP-2021-10).

References

  1. Hariharan S, Dharmaraj S. Selenium and selenoprtoein: it's role in regulation of inflammation. Inflammopharmacology 2020;28:667-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-020-00690-x
  2. Roman, M, Jitaru P, Barbante C. Selenium biochemistry and its role for human health. Metallomics 2014;6:25-54. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3mt00185g
  3. Chantiratikul A, Aengwanich W, Chinrasri O, Chantiratikul P. Plasma selenium concentration and glutathione peroxidase activity in red blood cell of laying hens fed sodium selenite or zinc-L-selenomethionine. Int J Poult Sci 2008;7:692-5. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.692.695
  4. Gjorgovsky N, Kiril F, Vesna L, Tosho K. The effect of different levels of selenium in feed on egg production, egg quality and selenium content in yolk. Lucrari stiintifice-Seria Zootehnie 2012;57:270-4.
  5. Lv L, Li L, Zhang R, Deng Z, Jin T, Du GEffects of dietary supplementation of selenium enriched yeast on egg selenium content and egg production of North China Hens. Pakistan J Zool 2019;51:49-55. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2019.51.1.49.55
  6. Lu J, Qu L, Ma M, et al. Efficacy evaluation of seleniumenriched yeast in laying hens: effects on performance, egg quality, organ development, and selenium deposition. Poult Sci 2020;99:6267-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.07.041
  7. Fisinin VI, Papazyan TT, Surai PF. Producing specialist poultry products to meet human nutrition requirements: selenium enriched eggs. World's Poult Sci J 2008;64:85-98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933907001742
  8. Chinrasri O, Chantiratikul P, Thosaikham W, et al. Effect of selenium-enriched bean sprout and other selenium sources on productivity and selenium concentration in eggs of laying hens. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2009;22:1661-6. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.90220
  9. Jiakui L, Xiaolong W. Effect of dietary organic versus inorganic selenium in laying hens on the productivity, selenium distribution in egg and selenium content in blood, liver and kidney. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2004;18:65-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2004.04.002
  10. Chantiratikul A, Chinrasri O, Chantiratikul P, Noochangsing A, Channarong S, Thosaikham W. Selenium enrichment in sprouts of sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Agric Nat Res 2019;53:608-11. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.anres.2019.53.6.07
  11. Maneetong S, Chookhampaeng S, Chantiratikul A, et al. Hydroponic cultivation of selenium-enriched kale (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra L.) seedling and speciation of selenium with HPLC-ICP-MS. Microchem J 2013;108:87-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2013.01.003
  12. Chinrasri O, Chantiratikul P, Maneetong S, Chookhampaeng S, Chantiratikul A. Productivity and selenium concentrations in egg and tissue of laying quails fed selenium from hydroponically produced selenium-enriched kale sprout (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra L.). Biol Trace Elem Res 2013;155:381-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-013-9824-3
  13. Chantiratikul A, Pakmaruek P, Chinrasri O, et al. Efficacy of selenium from hydroponically produced selenium-enriched kale sprout (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra L.) in broilers. Biol Trace Elem Res 2015;165:96-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-015-0227-5
  14. Chantiratikul A, Chinrasri O, Chantiratikul P. Effect of selenium from selenium-enriched kale sprout versus other selenium sources on productivity and selenium concentrations in egg and tissue of laying hens. Biol Trace Elem Res 2018;182:105-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-017-1069-0
  15. Leamsamrong K, Tongjaroenbuangam W, Maneetong S, Chantiratikul A, Chinrasri O, Chantiratikul P. Physicochemical contents, antioxidant activities, and acute toxicity assessment of selenium-enriched Chinese kale (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra L.) seedlings. J Chem 2019;2019: Article ID 7983038. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7983038
  16. Chantiratikul A, Borisuth L, Chinrasri O, et al. Evaluation of the toxicity of selenium from hydroponically produced selenium-enriched kale sprout in laying hens. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2016;35:116-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2016.02.007
  17. Luang-In V, Saengha W, Buranrat B, Chantiratikul A, Ma NL. Cytotoxicity of selenium-enriched Chinese kale (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra L.) seedlings against Caco-2, MCF-7 and HepG2 cancer cells. Pharmacogn J 2020;12:674-81. https://doi.org/10.5530/pj.2020.12.99
  18. Arnold RL, Olson OE, Carlson CW. Selenium withdrawal and egg selenium content. Poult Sci 1972;51:341-2. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0510341
  19. Chantiratikul A, Chinrasri O, Chantiratikul P. Effect of sodium selenite and zinc-L-selenomethionine on performance and selenium concentrations in eggs of laying hens. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2008;21:1048-52. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70576
  20. Ort JF, Latshaw JD. The toxic level of sodium selenite in the diet of laying chickens. J Nutr 1978;108:1114-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/108.7.1114
  21. National Research Council. Nutrition requirement of poultry. 9thed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 1994.
  22. Seo TC, Spallholz JE, Yun HK, Kim SW. Selenium-enriched garlic and cabbage as a dietary selenium source for broilers. J Med Food 2008;11:687-92. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2007.0053
  23. Bennett DC, Cheng KM. Selenium enrichment of table eggs. Poult Sci 2010;89:2166-72. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00571
  24. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of the AOAC International, 16th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC International; 1999.
  25. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT user's guide: release 6.03 ed. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc; 1996.
  26. Jing CL, Dong XF, Wang ZM, Lui S, Tong JM. Comparative study of DL-selenomethionine vs sodium selenite and selenoyeast on antioxidant activity and selenium status in laying hens. Poult Sci 2015;94:965-75. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev045
  27. Lu J, Qu L, Shen MM, et al. Comparison of dynamic change of egg selenium deposition after feeding sodium selenite or selenium-enriched yeast. Poult Sci 2018;97:3102-8. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey161
  28. Lu J, Qu L, Shen MM, et al. Effect of high-dose selenium-enriched yeast on laying performance, egg quality, clinical blood parameters, organ development, and selenium deposition in laying hens. Poult Sci 2019;98:2522-30. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey597
  29. Han XJ, Qin P, Li WX, et al. Effect of sodium selenite and selenium yeast on performance, egg quality, antioxidant capacity, and selenium deposition of laying hens. Poult Sci 2017;96:3973-80. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex216
  30. Meng T, Liu Y, Wie C, et al. Effects of different selenium sources on laying performance, egg selenium concentration, and antioxidant capacity in laying hens. Biol Trace Ele Res 2019;189:548-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-018-1490-z
  31. Ljali M, Briens M, Rouffineau F, Mercerand F, Geraert PA, Mercier Y. Effect of 2-hydroxy-4-methylselenobutanoic acid as a dietary selenium supplement to improve the selenium concentration of table eggs. J Anim Sci 2013;91:1745-52. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5825
  32. Radwan NL, Salah Eldin TA, El-Zaiat AA, Mostafa MSA. Effect of dietary nano-selenium supplementation on selenium content and oxidative stability in table eggs and productive performance of laying hens. Int J Poult Sci 2015;14:161-76. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2015.161.176
  33. Chantiratikul A, Arunsangseesod O, Wangkahart E, Leamsamrong K, Chantiratikul P. Effect of dietary selenium from selenium-enriched kale sprout, selenomethionine, and sodium selenite on performance and selenium concentrations in the tissues of growing quails. Anim Biosci 2021;34:692-700. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0111
  34. Sirichakwal PP, Puwastein P, Polngam J, Kongkachuichai R. Selenium content of Thai foods. J Food Comp Anal 2005;18: 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2003.10.010
  35. Surai PF, Kochish II, Fisinin VI, Velichko OA. Selenium in poultry nutrition: from sodium selenite to organic selenium sources. J Poult Sci 2018;55:79-93. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0170132
  36. Latshaw JD, Osman M. Distribution of selenium in egg white and yolk after feeding natural and synthetic selenium compounds. Poult Sci 1975;54:1244-52. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0541244
  37. Rayman MP, Infante HG, Sargent M. Food-chain selenium and human health: spotlight on speciation. Br J Nutr 2008; 100:238-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114508922522
  38. Payne RL, Lavergne TK, Southern LL. Effect of inorganic versus organic selenium on hen production and egg selenium concentration. Poult Sci 2005;84:232-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.2.232