Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회논문집)

Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Uncertainty of future runoff projection according to SSP scenarios and hydrologic model parameters

미래 기후변화 시나리오와 수문모형 매개변수에 따른 미래 유량예측 불확실성

  • Kim, Jin Hyuck (Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Song, Young Hoon (Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Chung, Eun-Sung (Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 김진혁 (서울과학기술대학교 건설시스템공학과) ;
  • 송영훈 (서울과학기술대학교 건설시스템공학과) ;
  • 정은성 (서울과학기술대학교 건설시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2022.09.30
  • Accepted : 2022.11.28
  • Published : 2023.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Future runoff analysis is influenced by climate change scenarios and hydrologic model parameters, with uncertainties. In this study, the uncertainty of future runoff analysis according to the shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) scenario and hydrologic model parameters was analyzed. Among the SSP scenarios, the SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios were used, and the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model was used as the hydrologic model. For the parameters of the SWAT model, a total of 11 parameter were optimized to the observed runoff data using SWAT-CUP. Then, uncertainty analysis of future estimated runoff compared to the observed runoff was performed using jensen-shannon divergence (JS-D), which can calculate the difference in distribution. As a result, uncertainty of future runoff was analyzed to be larger in SSP5-8.5 than in SSP2-4.5, and larger in the far future (2061-2100) than in the near future (2021-2060). In this study, the uncertainty of future runoff using future climate data according to the parameters of the hydrologic model is as follows. Uncertainty was greatly analyzed when parameters used observed runoff data in years with low flow rates compared to average years. In addition, the uncertainty of future runoff estimation was analyzed to be greater for the parameters of the period in which the change in runoff compared to the average year was greater.

미래 유량분석은 기후변화 시나리오와 수문모형의 매개변수에 영향을 받고 이에 따른 불확실성이 존재한다. 본 연구에서는 Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) 시나리오와 수문모형 매개변수에 따른 미래 유량 분석의 불확실성을 분석하고자 하였다. SSP 시나리오 중, 대표적으로 사용되는 SSP2-4.5와 SSP5-8.5시나리오를 사용하였으며, 수문모형으로는 Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) 모형을 사용하였다. SWAT 모형의 매개변수는 SWAT-CUP을 이용해 관측된 유량 데이터에 따라 총 11개의 기간에 대해 매개변수 최적화를 각각 수행하였다. 그 후 분포의 차이를 계산 할 수 있는 Jensen-Shannon Divergence (JS-D)를 이용해 과거 유량 대비 미래 추정된 유량의 불확실성 분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과 미래 유량의 불확실성은 SSP5-8.5에서 SSP2-4.5보다 더 크게 분석되었으며, 가까운 미래(2021-2060년) 보다 먼 미래(2061-2100년)에서 더 크게 분석되었다. 강우-유출 분석은 수문모형 매개변수에 따라 88.5%-108.5%까지 차이가 발생하였으며, 이에 따라 미래 유량을 추정하는데 불확실성이 발생하였다. 본 연구에서의 수문 모형의 매개변수에 따른 미래 유량 추정의 불확실성은 평년 대비 유량이 적은 연도의 관측 유량 데이터를 이용한 매개변수를 이용할 시 불확실성이 크게 분석되었다. 또한 평년 대비 유량 변화가 큰 기간의 매개 변수일수록 미래 유량 추정의 불확실성이 크게 분석되었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 K-water의 개방형 혁신 R&D (D-W-004)와 한국연구재단의(유형1-2) 중견연구(2021R1A2C200569912) 연구비 지원에 의해 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. Ahmed, N., Wang, G., Booij, M.J., Xiangyang, S., Hussain, F., and Nabi, G. (2022). "Separation of the impact of landuse/land-cover change and climate change on runoff in the upstream area of the Yangtze River, China." Water Resources Management, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-03021-z
  2. Akstinas, V., Jakimavicius, D., Meilutyte-Lukauskiene, D., Kriauciuniene, J., and Sarauskiene, D. (2020). "Uncertainty of annual runoff projections in Lithuanian rivers under a future climate." Hydrology Research, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 257-271. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2019.004
  3. Arnell, N.W., and Gosling, S.N. (2013). "The impacts of climate change on river flow regimes at the global scale." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 486, pp. 351-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.010
  4. Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R.S., and Williams, J.R. (1998). "Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development 1." JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
  5. Cha, W.Y., Lee, J., Kim, S.D., and Park, Y.K. (2017). "Analysis of indicators of hydrological alteration on the Geumho river basin under AR5 RCP scenarios." Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 317-326. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2017.17.4.317
  6. Chae, S.T., Song, Y.H., Lee, J., and Chung, E.S. (2022). "Prioritizing the target watersheds for permeable pavement to reduce flood damage in urban watersheds considering future climate scenarios." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 159-170. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2022.55.2.159
  7. Chen, C., Gan, R., Feng, D., Yang, F., and Zuo, Q. (2022). "Quantifying the contribution of SWAT modeling and CMIP6 inputting to streamflow prediction uncertainty under climate change." Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 364, 132675.
  8. Chim, K., Tunnicliffe, J., Shamseldin, A.Y., and Bun, H. (2021). "Assessment of land use and climate change effects on hydrology in the upper Siem Reap River and Angkor Temple Complex, Cambodia." Environmental Development, Vol. 39, 100615.
  9. Freeze, R.A., and Harlan, R.L. (1969). "Blueprint for a physically-based, digitally-simulated hydrologic response model." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 237-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(69)90020-1
  10. Giuntoli, I., Villarini, G., Prudhomme, C., and Hannah, D.M. (2018). "Uncertainties in projected runoff over the conterminous United States." Climatic Change, Vol. 150, No. 3, pp. 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2280-5
  11. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014). IPCC climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland.
  12. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2021). "Summary for Policymakers." Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Edited by Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S.L., Pean, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M.I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J.B.R., Maycock, T.K., Waterfield, T., Yelekci, O., Yu, R. and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press. In Press.
  13. Jang, Y., Park, J., and Seo, D. (2018). "Estimations of flow rate and pollutant loading changes of the Yo-Cheon basin under AR5 climate change scenarios using SWAT." Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 221-233. https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2018.32.3.221
  14. Kim, J.H., Sung, J.H., Chung, E.S., Kim, S.U., Son, M., and Shiru, M.S. (2021). "Comparison of Projection in meteorological and hydrological droughts in the cheongmicheon watershed for RCP4. 5 and SSP2-4.5." Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2066.
  15. Kim, J.H., Sung, J.H., Shahid, S., and Chung, E.S. (2022). "Future hydrological drought analysis considering agricultural water withdrawal under SSP scenarios." Water Resources Management, Vol. 36, pp. 2913-2930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03116-1
  16. Kirchner, J.W. (2006). "Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology." Water Resources Research, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004362
  17. Lee, G.H., Yeon, M.H., Kim, Y.H., and Jung, S.H. (2022). "Analysis of the effect of objective functions on hydrologic model calibration and simulation." Journal of Korean Society of Disaster and Security, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-12.
  18. Majtey, A., Lamberti, P.W., Martin, M.T., and Plastino, A. (2005). "Wootters' distance revisited: A new distinguishability criterium." The European Physical Journal D-Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Physics, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 413-419. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2005-00005-1
  19. O'Neill, B.C., Kriegler, E., Ebi, K.L., Kemp-Benedict, E., Riahi, K., Rothman, D.S., van Ruijven, B.J., van Vuuren, D.P., Birkmann, J., Kok, K., Levy, M., and Solecki, W. (2017). "The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century." Global Environmental Change, Vol. 42, pp. 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004
  20. O'Neill, B.C., Tebaldi, C., van Vuuren, D., Eyring, V., Friedlingstein, P., Hurtt, G., Knutti, R., Kriegler, E., Lamarque, J.F., Lowe, J., Meehl, J., Moss, R., Riahi, K., and Sanderson, B.M. (2016). "The scenario model intercomparison project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6." Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, No. 9, pp. 3461-3482. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
  21. Peel, M.C., Srikanthan, R., McMahon, T.A., and Karoly, D.J. (2015). "Approximating uncertainty of annual runoff and reservoir yield using stochastic replicates of global climate model data." Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 1615-1639. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1615-2015
  22. Senent-Aparicio, J., Jimeno-Saez, P., Lopez-Ballesteros, A., Gimenez, J.G., Perez-Sanchez, J., Cecilia, J.M., and Srinivasan, R. (2021). "Impacts of swat weather generator statistics from high-resolution datasets on monthly streamflow simulation over Peninsular Spain." Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, Vol. 35, 100826.
  23. Song, Y.H., Chung, E.S., and Shiru, M.S. (2020). "Uncertainty analysis of monthly precipitation in GCMs using multiple bias correction methods under different RCPs." Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 18, 7508.
  24. Song, Y.H., Chung, E.S., and Shahid, S. (2021a). "Spatiotemporal differences and uncertainties in projections of precipitation and temperature in South Korea from CMIP6 and CMIP5 general circulation models." International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 41, No. 13, pp. 5899-5919. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7159
  25. Song, Y.H., Nashwan, M.S., Chung, E.S., and Shahid, S. (2021b). "Advances in CMIP6 INM-CM5 over CMIP5 INM-CM4 for precipitation simulation in South Korea." Atmospheric Research, Vol. 247, 105261.
  26. Su, B., Huang, J., Mondal, S.K., Zhai, J., Wang, Y., Wen, S., Gao, M., Lv, Y., Jiang, S., Jiang T., and Li, A., (2021). "Insight from CMIP6 SSP-RCP scenarios for future drought characteristics in China." Atmospheric Research, Vol. 250, 105375.
  27. Teweldebrhan, A.T., Burkhart, J.F., and Schuler, T.V. (2018). "Parameter uncertainty analysis for an operational hydrological model using residual-based and limits of acceptability approaches." Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 5021-5039. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5021-2018
  28. Vasiliades, L., Loukas, A., and Liberis, N. (2011). "A water balance derived drought index for Pinios River Basin, Greece." Water Resources Management, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 1087-1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9665-1
  29. Xie, K., Liu, P., Zhang, J., Wang, G., Zhang, X., and Zhou, L. (2021). "Identification of spatially distributed parameters of hydrological models using the dimension-adaptive key grid calibration strategy." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 598, 125772.
  30. Yasuda, T., Nakajo, S., Kim, S., Mase, H., Mori, N., and Horsburgh, K. (2014). "Evaluation of future storm surge risk in East Asia based on state-of-the-art climate change projection." Coastal Engineering, Vol. 83, pp. 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.10.003
  31. Yonaba, R., Biaou, A.C., Koita, M., Tazen, F., Mounirou, L.A., Zoure, C.O., Queloz, P., Karambiri, H., and Yacouba, H. (2021). "A dynamic land use/land cover input helps in picturing the Sahelian paradox: Assessing variability and attribution of changes in surface runoff in a Sahelian watershed." Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 757, No. 25, 143792.
  32. Zeng, S., Zhan, C., Sun, F., Du, H., and Wang, F. (2015). "Effects of climate change and human activities on surface runoff in the Luan River Basin." Advances in Meteorology, Vol. 2015, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/740239
  33. Zhang, R., Cheng, L., Liu, P., Huang, K., Gong, Y., Qin, S., and Liu, D. (2021). "Effect of GCM credibility on water resource system robustness under climate change based on decision scaling." Advances in Water Resources, Vol. 158, 104063.
  34. Zhao, Y., Xu, K., Dong, N., and Wang, H. (2022). "Projection of climate change impacts on hydropower in the source region of the Yangtze River based on CMIP6." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 606, 127453.