Acknowledgement
This study was financially supported by Chonnam National University (Grant number: 2022-0105).
References
- Baek, D. H., & Lee, K. H. (2017). A study on the qualitative differences analysis between multiple solutions in terms of mathematical creativity. School Mathematics, 19(3), 481-494.
- Bahr, D. L., & Bahr, K. (2017). Engaging all students in mathematical discussions. Teaching Children Mathematics, 23(6), 350-359. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.23.6.0350
- Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathematiques, 1970-1990. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms : Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171
- Cho, Y. J., & Shin, H. K. (2010). Analysis of pattern of mathematical interaction occurring in the elementary school mathematics class. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 14(3), 681-700.
- Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119-142. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025002119
- Cothran, D. J., & Ennis, C. D. (2000). Building bridges to student engagement: Communicating respect and care for students in urban high schools. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 33(2), 106-117.
- De Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. Cambridge University Press.
- Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. (2012). Student engagement: What is it and why does it matter? In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschy, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97-131). Springer.
- Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
- Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M. T., Linn, J. S., Hofkens, T. L., Sugn, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009
- Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence. A. Parsons & S. Milgram (Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
- Ha, S. S. (2008). A study on the understanding of the concept of implication [Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University]. http://dcollection.snu.ac.kr:80/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000039997
- Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2002). Authentic activities and online learning. In A. Goody, J. Herrington, & M. Northcote (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th HERDSA annual conference (pp. 562-567). HERDSA.
- Jang, S. B. (2018). Effects of open-ended problems on underachievers. The Journal of Curriculum and Instruction Studies, 11(1), 1-31.
- Jeong, E. I. (2012). Exploring the factors that influence college students' class participation: Focus on autonomy support, academic self-efficacy, and task value. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 24(2), 355-378. http://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2012.24.2.355
- Jo, M. J. (2020). A case study on an individualized instructional programs by analyzing the factors of poor learning in mathematics [Master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education]. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15647923&outLink=K
- Jung, Y. S., & Choi, H. S. (2006). Factors influencing learner participation in web-based online discussion. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 12(4), 51-75.
- Kang, S. M., & Kim, M. K. (2014). Constructing norms in elementary mathematics classrooms. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 17(2), 207-234.
- Kang, W., Kim, S. M., Park, M. G., Paek, S. Y., Oh, Y. Y., & Chang, H. (2014). Theory of teaching elementary mathematics. Kyungmoon Publishers.
- Kim, B. M., & Kim, Y. M. (2021). Analysis of collaborative problem solving and student-engaged instruction in middle school mathematics. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(21), 499-517. http://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.21.499
- Kim, E. H., & Park, M. G. (2011). An analysis on the responses and the behavioral characteristics between mathematically promising students and normal students in solving open-ended mathematical problems. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 15(1), 19-38.
- Kim, N. G., Kim, S. J. , Song, D. H., Oh, M. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2022). A study on analyzing solution spaces of open-ended tasks in elementary mathematics. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 25(1), 81-100. http://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2022.25.1.81
- Kim, N. H., & Kim, J. B. (2011). The relationship between student-teacher attachment relationship and academic achievement mediated by basic psychological needs and academic engagement: differences in the meaning and roles of teacher support and student-teacher attachment relationship. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(4), 763-789.
- Kim, Y. C. (2013). Qualitative research methodology. Academy Press.
- Kim, Y. J., & Na, G. S. (2009). A Study on the mathematical communication focused on the students' level of mathematical understanding. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 13(2), 141-161.
- Ko, E. S., Park, M. S., & Lee, E. J. (2016). Prospective elementary teachers' perceptions on assessment in mathematics. School Mathematics, 18(1), 61-83.
- Ko, J. W., Kim, H. J., & Kim, M. S. (2011). The impact of students' college experiences on students' cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes, and instructional satisfaction. The Korean Educational Administration Society, 29(4), 169-194.
- Kwon, O. N., Cho, Y. M., Park, J. S., & Park, J. H. (2005). Cultivating mathematical creativity through open-ended approaches : Development of a program and effectiveness analysis. The Mathematical Education, 44(2), 307-323.
- Lee, C. Y. (2012). A study for improving mathematics instruction through open problems in the elementary school. The Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 307-322.
- Lee, D. H. (2008). A study on the results of use of open-ended problems for evaluation in elementary mathematics. The Mathematical Education, 47(4), 421-436.
- Lee, D. H. (2014). A study on the measurement in mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. School Mathematics, 16(1), 1-17.
- Lee, D. J. (2004). Inquiry into learners' sense of community in online learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology, 20(3), 53-73. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.20.3.51
- Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman & B. Koichu (Eds.) Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129-145). Sense Publishers.
- Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.11.001
- Ministry of Education (2022). Mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice 2022-33 [8th Separated Book]. https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=141&boardSeq=93458&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=040401&opType=N
- NCSM & NCTM (2020). Moving forward: Mathematics learning in the era of COVID-19. https://www.nctm.org/Research-and-Advocacy/Moving-Forward---NCSM-and-NCTM-Joint-Statement/
- NCTM (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.
- Nam S. I., Ryu S. R., Kwon, S. R., Shin, J. S., Park, S. S., Park, M. G., Choi, G. B., Kwon, J. R., & Lee, J. H. (2017). Theory of elementary mathematics education. Kyungmoon Publishers.
- Pang, J. S., & Jeong, H. J. (2006). Elementary school teachers' understanding and practice on learner-centered instruction : Focused on mathematical communication. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 6(1), 297-321.
- Park, D. W. (2014). Students' understanding of material implications. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 17(4), 805-816.
- Park, J. H., & Kim, A. R. (2021). A survey on implementing mathematics teaching and learning based on 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 25(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2021.25.2.121
- Park, S. Y. (2004). Student and teacher variables improving student engagement. The Journal of Educational Administration, 22(2), 91-108.
- Park, W. J., & Jeon, P. K. (2003). An analysis of small-group children's consensus patterns in open-ended problem solving. Education of Elementary School Mathematics, 7(2), 117-129.
- Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves : The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-585. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
- Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Baroody, A. E., Larsen, R. A. A., Curby, T. W., & Abruy, T. (2015). To what extent do teacher-student interaction quality and student gender contribution to fifth graders' engagement in mathematics learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 170-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037252
- Rowland, T., Thawaites, A., & Jared, L. (2011). Triggers of contingency in mathematics teaching. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proc. 35th conf. of the Int. Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 73-80). PME.
- Seo, D. Y. (1999). Investigations on the possibility of teaching of implication in elementary school. School Mathematics, 1(1), 95-107.
- Seo, Y. M., & Park, M. G. (2021). The effects of open-ended mathematical problem solving learning on mathematical creativity and attitudes of elementary students. Communications of Mathematics Education, 35(3), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2021.35.3.277
- Shin, I. S., & Kim, S. M. (2006). An analysis on behavior characteristics between gifted students and talented students in open-end mathematical problem solving. Communcations of Mathematical Education, 20(1), 33-59.
- Shulman, L. S. (2005). To dignify the profession of the teacher : The carnegie foundatin celebrates 100 Years. The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(5), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.37.5.22-29
- Skilling, K., Bobis, J., Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., & Way, J. (2016). What secondary teachers think and do about student engagement in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(4), 545-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-016-0179-x
- Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children's behaviral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
- Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. NCTM.
- Taylor, S. S., & Statler, M. (2013). Material matters : Increasing emotional engagement in learning. Journal of Management Education, 38(4), 586-607. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562913489976
- Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher's role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516-551. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308320292
- Wang, K. S., Jung, H. Y., & Kim, G. Y. (2004). Development of a mathematics instruction model and its application on the social constructivism. The Journal of Elementary Education, 17(2), 389-418.
- Yoon, J. E., Cho, H. M., & Kwon, O. N. (2016). Analyzing students' engagement factors in flipped mathematics class. The Mathematical Education, 55(3), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2016.55.3.299