DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Students' cognition and a teacher's questioning strategies in the error-finding activity of the concept of irrational numbers

무리수 개념의 오류 찾기 활동에서 학생 인식과 교사의 발문 전략

  • Received : 2023.01.06
  • Accepted : 2023.01.29
  • Published : 2023.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine not only students' cognition in the mathematical error-finding activity of the concept of irrational numbers, but also the students' learning stance regarding the use of errors and a teacher's questioning strategies that lead to changes in the level of mathematical discourse. To this end, error-finding individual activities, group activities, and additional interviews were conducted with 133 middle school students, and students' cognition and the teacher's questioning strategies for changes in students' learning stance and levels of mathematical discourse were analyzed. As a result of the study, students' cognition focuses on the symbolic representation of irrational numbers and the representation of decimal numbers, and they recognize the existence of irrational numbers on a number line, but tend to have difficulty expressing a number line using figures. In addition, the importance of the teacher's leading and exploring questioning strategy was observed to promote changes in students' learning stance and levels of mathematical discourse. This study is valuable in that it specified the method of using errors in mathematics teaching and learning and elaborated the teacher's questioning strategies in finding mathematical errors.

본 연구는 무리수 개념의 수학 오류 찾기 활동에서 학생의 인식뿐 아니라, 오류 활용에 관한 학생의 학습 태도와 수학적 담론 수준의 변화를 초래하는 교사의 발문 전략을 살펴보는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 133명의 중학교 학생을 대상으로 오류 찾기 개인별 활동, 모둠 활동과 추가 면담을 수행하여, 학생의 인식과 학생의 학습 태도와 수학적 담론 수준의 변화를 위한 교사의 발문 전략을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 학생들의 인식은 무리수의 기호 표상과 소수 표상에 집중하며 수직선 위의 무리수의 존재성은 인식하지만 도형을 활용한 수직선 표현에는 어려움을 겪는 경향이 있었다. 또한 학생의 학습 태도와 수학적 담론 수준의 변화를 촉진하기 위해 교사의 유도적-탐구적 발문 전략의 중요성을 관찰할 수 있었다. 본 연구는 수학 교수·학습에서 오류의 활용 방법을 구체화하고, 수학 오류 찾기에서 교사의 발문 전략을 정교화하였다는 점에서 가치가 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the College of Education, Korea University Grant in 2022; This work was a revision of Na's master thesis (2023).

References

  1. Adler, J., & Ronda, E. (2019). Mathematical discourse in instruction matters. In J. Adler & A. Sfard (Eds.), Research for educational change: transforming researchers' insights into improvement in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 44-81). Routledge.
  2. Artzt, A. F., Armour-Thomas, E., & Curcio, F. R. (2015). Becoming a reflective mathematics teacher : a guide for observations and selfassessment(Park, S., Shin, J. & Jang, I. Trans.) Kyungmoonsa. (Origin published in 2008)
  3. Boaler, J., & Brodie, K. (2004). The importance, nature and impact of teacher questions. Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 774-783). Toronto, Canada.
  4. Borasi, R. (1987). Exploring mathematics through the analysis of errors. For the Learning of Mathematics, 7(3), 2-8.
  5. Borasi, R. (1996). Reconceiving Mathematics Instruction: A Focus on Errors. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  6. Cho, J. W., Park, M., Lee, K., & Lee, E. (2016). Characteristics of teachers' queationing to formulate an effective mathematics discourse. School Mathematics, 18(1), 193-214.
  7. Choe, S. H., Nam, G. C., & Ryu, H. (2013). Development of instruction material for understanding students to correction of misconception. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 23(2), 117-133.
  8. Choi, E., & Kang, H. (2016). Pre-service teachers' understanding of the concept and representations of irrational numbers. School Mathematics, 18(3), 647-666.
  9. Choi, S., Ha, J., & Kim, D. (2016a). An anaylsis of student engagement strategy and questioning strategy in peer mentoring teaching method. Journal of the Korean School Mathematic Society, 19(2), 153-176.
  10. Choi, S., Ha, J., & Kim, D. (2016b). A communicational approach to mathematical process appeared in a peer mentoring teaching method. Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(3), 375-392. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2016.30.3.375
  11. Clements, M. A. (1980). Analyzing children's errors on written mathematical tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369157
  12. Franke, M. L., Webb, N. M., Chan, A. G., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students' mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109339906
  13. Hwang, H. J., & Kim, M. S. (2014). A case study on student self-evaluation of wrong answers in school mathematics. Communication of Mathematics Education, 28(2), 255-279. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2014.28.2.255
  14. Jo, Y. D., & Ko, H. K. (2015). Analysis of errors by response assessments of Korean middle school students on the 2013 national assessment of educational achievement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 25(3), 281-302.
  15. Kang, J. G. (2016). Difficulties and alternative ways to learn irrational number concept in terms of notation. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 19(1), 63-82.
  16. Kang, H., & Choi, E. (2017). Teacher knowledge necessary to analyze student's errors and difficulties about the concept of irrational numbers. School Mathematics, 19(2), 319-343.
  17. Kim, A. R. (2019). The effects of the discussion using errors on mathematical problem solving abilities and mathematical disposition[Master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education].
  18. Kim, B. M. (2005a). A cognitive psychological study on students' mathematical misconceptions and errors[Doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University].
  19. Kim, B. M. (2005b). Cognitive psychological approaches for classification of students' mathematical errors on the basis of experiential structuralism. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 15(4), 461-488.
  20. Kim, B. M. (2009). An analysis of applicability of the conceptional growth learning of students' mathematical errors. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 13(2), 393-415. http://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2009.13.2.393
  21. Kim, S. (2009). Effect of self-evaluation to identify cause of wrong answers on achievement. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 22(1), 29-56.
  22. Kim, S. (2011). An external validation of the self-evaluation of wrong answers: with 11th grade mathematics and english classes. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 24(2), 209-230.
  23. Kim, Y. H. (2001). Analysis of error on the process of solving the linear inequality[Master's thesis, Kongju National University].
  24. Lee, D. H., & Park, B. (2001). A study in intuition and its fallacy in mathematics education. The Mathematical Education, 40(1), 15-25.
  25. Lee, C. H. (2002). History and errors in mathematics. Journal for History of Mathematics, 15(3), 35-48.
  26. Lee, C. H., & Kim, B. M. (2006). The effects of 'error detection-correction instruction' on learning linear equations. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 10(2), 461-483.
  27. Lee, S. B. (2013). Perspective secondary mathematics teachers' understanding of irrational numbers. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 16(3), 499-518.
  28. Lim, J. H., & Choi, C. W. (2016). Effects on the application by finding errors in the learning of figure. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 19(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2016.19.1.31
  29. Movshovitz-Hadar, N., Zaslavsky, O., & Inbar, S. (1987). An empirical classification model for errors in high school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(1), 3-14.
  30. Na, Y. (2023). Students' understanding level, the stance of learning, and the level of math discourse in the error finding activity for the concept of irrational numbers[Master's thesis, Korea University]. 
  31. NCTM (2007). Mathematics teaching today. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  32. Newman, M. A. (1977). An analysis of sixth-grade pupil's error on written mathematical tasks. Victorian Institute for Educational Research Bulletin, 39, 31-43.
  33. Park, H. J. (2008). An analysis of the errors of 1st-grade middle school students in mathematical symbols and equations. Journal of Education & Culture, 14(1), 105-133.
  34. Park, J., Ryu, S. K., & Lee, J. K. (2012). The analysis of mathematics error type that appears from the process of solving problem related to real life. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 15(4), 699-718.
  35. Park, Y. H., Park, D. W., & Jung, I. (2004). Study on learner's understanding of the concept of irrational number in middle school. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 7(2), 99-116.
  36. Radatz, H. (1979). Error analysis in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.2307/748380
  37. Zazkis, R., & Sirotic, N. (2010). Representing and defining irrational numbers: exposing the missing link. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 16, 1-27.  https://doi.org/10.1090/cbmath/016/01