DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Knowledge Representation Using Fuzzy Ontologies: A Survey

  • V.Manikandabalaji (Department of Computer Science, A.V.V.M.Sri Pushpam College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University) ;
  • R.Sivakumar (Department of Computer Science, A.V.V.M.Sri Pushpam College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University)
  • Received : 2022.12.05
  • Published : 2023.12.30

Abstract

In recent decades, the growth of communication technology has resulted in an explosion of data-related information. Ontology perception is being used as a growing requirement to integrate data and unique functionalities. Ontologies are not only critical for transforming the traditional web into the semantic web but also for the development of intelligent applications that use semantic enrichment and machine learning to transform data into smart data. To address these unclear facts, several researchers have been focused on expanding ontologies and semantic web technologies. Due to the lack of clear-cut limitations, ontologies would not suffice to deliver uncertain information among domain ideas, conceptual formalism supplied by traditional. To deal with this ambiguity, it is suggested that fuzzy ontologies should be used. It employs Ontology to introduce fuzzy logical policies for ambiguous area concepts such as darkness, heat, thickness, creaminess, and so on in a device-readable and compatible format. This survey efforts to provide a brief and conveniently understandable study of the research directions taken in the domain of ontology to deal with fuzzy information; reconcile various definitions observed in scientific literature, and identify some of the domain's future research-challenging scenarios. This work is hoping that this evaluation can be treasured by fuzzy ontology scholars. This paper concludes by the way of reviewing present research and stating research gaps for buddy researchers.

Keywords

References

  1. Zhang, X., Hu, B., Chen, J. and Moore, P.: Ontology-based context modeling for emotion recognition in an intelligent web. World Wide Web 16(4), 497-513 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-012-0181-5
  2. Tudorache, T.: Ontology engineering: Current state, challenges, and future directions. Semantic Web 11(1), 125-138 (2020).  https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-190382
  3. Sattar, A., Surin, E.S.M., Ahmad, M.N., Ahmad, M. and Mahmood, A.K..: Comparative analysis of methodologies for domain ontology development: A systematic review. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl 11(5), 99-108 (2020). 
  4. Shvaiko, P. and Euzenat, J. Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering 25(1), 158-176 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2011.253
  5. Zhang, L., Chen, H., Zhang, Y. and Chen, T.: Fine construction of HIV protein ontology. 3rd International Conference on Information Systems Engineering (ICISE). IEEE (2018). 
  6. Sarker, I.H., Hoque, M.M., Uddin, M. and Alsanoosy, T.:Mobile data science and intelligent apps: concepts, ai-based modeling and research directions. Mobile Networks and Applications 26(1), 285-303 (2021).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01650-z
  7. Fernandez, M., Cantador, I., Lopez, V., Vallet, D., Castells, P. and Motta, E.: Semantically enhanced information retrieval: An ontology-based approach. Journal of Web Semantics 9(4), 434-452 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2010.11.003
  8. Samani, Z.R. and Shamsfard, M.: The state of the art in developing fuzzy ontologies: A survey." arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02290 (2018). 
  9. Abulaish, M. and Dey, L.: A fuzzy ontology generation framework for handling uncertainties and non uniformity in domain knowledge description. International Conference on Computing: Theory and Applications (ICCTA'07). IEEE (2007). 
  10. Borgwardt, S., Distel, F. and Penaloza, R.: Decidable Godel description logics without the finitely-valued model property. Fourteenth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (2014). 
  11. Bobillo, F. and Straccia, U.: Fuzzy ontology representation using OWL 2. International journal of approximate reasoning 52(7), 1073-1094 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2011.05.003
  12. Devadoss, N. and Ramakrishnan, S.: Knowledge representation using fuzzy ontologies-a review. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies 6(5), 4304-4308 (2015). 
  13. Straccia, U.: All about fuzzy description logics and applications. Reasoning Web International Summer School. Springer (2015). 
  14. Abanda, F.H., Kamsu-Foguem, B. and Tah, J.H.M.: BIM-New rules of measurement ontology for construction cost estimation. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 20(2), 443-459 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2017.01.007
  15. Cross, V.V.: Fuzzy ontologies: The state of the art. IEEE Conference on Norbert Wiener in the 21st Century (21CW), IEEE (2014). 
  16. Huitzil, I., Molina-Solana, M., Gomez-Romero, J. and Bobillo, F.: Minimalistic fuzzy ontology reasoning: An application to Building Information Modeling. Applied Soft Computing 103, 107158 (2021). 
  17. Szwed, P.: Application of fuzzy ontological reasoning in an implementation of medical guidelines. 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI). IEEE (2013).