Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

The Korean Neurosurgical Society (대한신경외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Location of Ulnar Nerve Branches to the Flexor Carpi Ulnaris during Surgery for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

  • Won Seok, Lee (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hee-Jin, Yang (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital) ;
  • Sung Bae, Park (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital) ;
  • Young Je, Son (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital) ;
  • Noah, Hong (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital) ;
  • Sang Hyung, Lee (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital)
  • Received : 2022.06.06
  • Accepted : 2022.09.06
  • Published : 2023.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : Cubital tunnel syndrome, the most common ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy, is usually managed by simple decompression or anterior transposition. One of the concerns in transposition is damage to the nerve branches around the elbow. In this study, the location of ulnar nerve branches to the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) was assessed during operations for cubital tunnel syndrome to provide information to reduce operation-related complications. Methods : A personal series (HJY) of cases operated for cubital tunnel syndrome was reviewed. Cases managed by transposition and location of branches to the FCU were selected for analysis. The function of the branches was confirmed by intraoperative nerve stimulation and the location of the branches was assessed by the distance from the center of medial epicondyle. Results : There was a total of 61 cases of cubital tunnel syndrome, among which 31 were treated by transposition. Twenty-one cases with information on the location of branches were analyzed. The average number of ulnar nerve branches around the elbow was 1.8 (0 to 3), only one case showed no branches. Most of the cases had one branch to the medial head, and one other to the lateral head of the FCU. There were two cases having branches without FCU responses (one branch in one case, three branches in another). The location of the branches to the medial head was 16.3±8.6 mm distal to the medial epicondyle (16 branches; range, 0 to 35 mm), to the lateral head was 19.5±9.5 mm distal to the medial epicondyle (19 branches; range, -5 to 30 mm). Branches without FCU responses were found from 20 mm proximal to the medial condyle to 15 mm distal to the medial epicondyle (five branches). Most of the branches to the medial head were 15 to 20 mm (50% of cases), and most to the lateral head were 15 to 25 mm (58% of cases). There were no cases of discernable weakness of the FCU after operation. Conclusion : In most cases of cubital tunnel syndrome, there are ulnar nerve branches around the elbow. Although there might be some cases with branches without FCU responses, most branches are to the FCU, and are to be saved. The operator should be watchful for branches about 15 to 25 mm distal to the medial epicondyle, where most branches come out.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was partly supported by a clinical research fund of Seoul National University Boramae Hospital.

References

  1. Doyle JR : Surgical Anatomy of the Hand and Upper Extremity. Philadelphia : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003, p204 
  2. Dugan SH, Lundgren M, Inouye S, Molen JV, Freemyer-Brown A : Variation in the origin of the first motor branch of the ulnar nerve to the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle. FASEB J 34(S1) : 1, 2020  https://doi.org/10.1096/fsb2.21134
  3. Marur T, Akkin SM, Alp M, Demirci S, Yalcin L, Ogut T, et al. : The muscular branching patterns of the ulnar nerve to the flexor carpi ulnaris and flexor digitorum profundus muscles. Surg Radiol Anat 27 : 322-326, 2005  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-005-0325-8
  4. Ogata K, Manske PR, Lesker PA : The effect of surgical dissection on regional blood flow to the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel. Clin Orthop Relat Res (193) : 195-198, 1985 
  5. Palmer BA, Hughes TB : Cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 35 : 153-163, 2010  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.11.004
  6. Park IJ, Kim HM, Lee JY, Jeong C, Kang Y, Hwang S, et al. : Cubital tunnel syndrome caused by anconeus epitrochlearis muscle. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 61 : 618-624, 2018  https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2018.0033
  7. Paulos R, Leclercq C : Motor branches of the ulnar nerve to the forearm: an anatomical study and guidelines for selective neurectomy. Surg Radiol Anat 37 : 1043-1048, 2015  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1448-1
  8. Tubbs RS, Custis JW, Salter EG, Blount JP, Oakes WJ, Wellons JC 3rd : Quantitation of and landmarks for the muscular branches of the ulnar nerve to the forearm for application in peripheral nerve neurotization procedures. J Neurosurg 104 : 800-803, 2006  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2006.104.5.80
  9. Watchmaker GP, Lee G, Mackinnon SE : Intraneural topography of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel facilitates anterior transposition. J Hand Surg Am 19 : 915-922, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-5023(94)90090-6