과제정보
Project implemented with financial contribution from the Italian National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work: BRIC 2019 ID n. 20/2019.
참고문헌
- European Agency for Safety & Health at Work. Research on work-related stress. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2000.
- Leka S, Jain A., World Health Organization. Health impact of psychosocial hazards at work: an overview. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
- Leka S, Jain A, Iavicoli S, Di Tecco C. An evaluation of the policy context on psychosocial risks and mental health in the workplace in the European Union: achievements, challenges, and the future. Biomed Res Int 2015 Oct 18;2015:213089.
- International Labour Organization. Global commission on the future of work-Work for a brighter future. Geneva: ILO; 2019.
- Schulte PA, Streit JMK, Sheriff F, Delclos G, Felknor SA, Tamers SL, Fendinger S, Grosch J, Sala R. Potential scenarios and hazards in the work of the future: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed and gray literature. Ann Work Expo Health 2020 Oct 8;64(8):786-816. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaa051
- Leka S. The future of working in a virtual environment and occupational safety and health. Discussion paper [Internet]. Bilbao: European Agency for Safety & Health at work. 2021 [cited 2023 Mar 06]. Available from: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/future-working-virtual-environment-and-occupational-safety-and-health.
- European Commission. Peer Review on 'Legislation and practical management of psychosocial risks at work. A critical evaluation of the EU policy context'. Thematic Discussion Paper. Written by Stavroula Leka in collaboration with Sergio Iavicoli and ICF [Internet]. Brussels: European Commission. 2019 Sep cited 2023 Mar 06]. Available from: file:///C:/Users/xf49637/Downloads/Thematic%20Discussion%20KE-02-20-730-EN-N%20(5).pdf.
- European Commission. Interpretative document on the implementation of Council Directive 89/391/EEC in relation to mental health in the workplace [Internet]. Brussels: European Commission. 2014 [cited 2023 Mar 06]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=13880&langId=en.
- European Commission. Report on the implementation of the European social partners - framework agreement on work-related stress. SEC; 2011. 241 p final, Commission staff working paper. [Internet] Brussels: European Commission; 2011 [cited 2023 Mar 06]. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0241/COM_SEC(2011)0241_EN.pdf.
- Iavicoli S, Leka S, Jain A, Persechino B, Rondinone BM, Ronchetti M, Valenti A. Hard and soft law approaches to addressing psychosocial risks in Europe: lessons learned in the development of the Italian approach. J Risk Res 2014 Aug 9;17(7):855-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2013.822911
- INAIL. The methodology for the assessment and management of work-related stress risk. Handbook for companies. In: Compliance with LEGISLATIVE. Decree 81/2008 and subsequent integrations and modifications. Milan: Tipolitografia INAIL; 2018.
- Iavicoli S, Di Tecco C. The management of psychosocial risks at work: state of the art and future perspectives. Med Lav 2020 Oct 31;111(5):335-50.
- European Agency for Safety & Health at Work. European survey of enterprises on new and emerging risks: managing safety and health at work. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2010.
- European Agency for Safety & Health at Work. Second European survey of enterprises on new and emerging risks (ESENER-2). Overview report: managing safety and health at work.. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2016.
- Di Tecco C, Jain A, Valenti A, Iavicoli S, Leka S. An evaluation of the impact of a policy-level intervention to address psychosocial risks on organisational action in Italy. Saf Sci 2017 Dec 1;100:103-9.
- European Agency for Safety & Health at Work. Third European survey of enterprises on new and emerging risks (ESENER 2019): overview report how European workplaces manage safety and health. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2022.
- Jain A, Torres LD, Teoh K, Leka S. The impact of national legislation on psychosocial risks on organisational action plans, psychosocial working conditions, and employee work-related stress in Europe. Soc Sci Med 2022;302:114987.
- Nielsen K, Randall R. Opening the black box: a framework for evaluating organizational-level occupational health interventions. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 2013;22(5):601-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.690556
- Nielsen K, Miraglia M. What works for whom in which circumstances? On the need to move beyond the 'what works?'question in organizational intervention research. Hum Relat 2017 Jan;70(1):40-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716670226
- Lamontagne AD, Keegel T, Louie AM, Ostry A, Landsbergis PA. A systematic review of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature, 1990-2005. Int J Occup Environ Health 2007 Jul-Sep;13(3):268-80. https://doi.org/10.1179/oeh.2007.13.3.268
- Holman D, Johnson S, O'Connor E. Stress management interventions: improving subjective psychological well-being in the workplace. Handbook of well-beingvol. 2. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers; 2018.
- Montano D, Hoven H, Siegrist J. Effects of organisational-level interventions at work on employees' health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2014 Dec;14(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1
- Tappura S, Jaaskelainen A, Pirhonen J. Creation of satisfactory safety culture by developing its key dimensions. Saf Sci 2022 Oct 1;154:105849.
- Dollard MF, Bakker AB. Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. J Occup Health Psychol 2010 Sep;83(3):579-99.
- Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Job demands-resources theory: taking stock and looking forward. J Occup Health Psychol 2017 Jul;22(3):273-85. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
- Schaufeli WB, Taris TW. A critical review of the job demands-resources model: implications for improving work and health. Bridging occupational, organizational and public health: a transdisciplinary approach. In: Bauer GF, Hammig O, editors. Bridging occupational, organizational and public health. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 43-68.
- Eurofound. Sixth. European working conditions survey - overview report (2017 update). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017.
- Eurofound. Working conditions and workers' health. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2019.
- R Core Team. R. A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2021 [cited 2023 Mar 06]. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
- Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications; 2015 Nov 3.
- Morata-Ramirez MD, Holgado-Tello FP. Construct validity of Likert scales through confirmatory factor analysis: a simulation study comparing different methods of estimation based on Pearson and polychoric correlations. Int J Soc Sci Stud 2013;1(1):54-61.
- Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd edition). New York: Routledge; 2016.
- Lai K. Estimating standardized SEM parameters given nonnormal data and incorrect model: methods and comparison. Struct Equation Model A Multidisciplinary J 2018;25(4):600-20. Lai K. Estimating standardized SEM parameters given nonnormal data and incorrect model: Methods and comparison. Struct Equ Modeling. 2018 Jul 4;25(4):600-20.
- International Labour Organization. Workplace Stress: a collective challenge. Geneva: ILO; 2016.
- Persechino B, Valenti A, Ronchetti M, Rondinone BM, Di Tecco C, Vitali S, Iavicoli S. Work-related stress risk assessment in Italy: a methodological proposal adapted to regulatory guidelines. Saf Health Work 2013 Jun;4(2):95-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.05.002
- Di Tecco C, Ronchetti M, Ghelli M, Russo S, Persechino B, Iavicoli S. Do Italian companies manage work-related stress effectively? A process evaluation in implementing the INAIL methodology. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:197156.
- Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 2003 Oct;88(5):879.
- Srivastava S. Verifiability is a core principle of science. Behav Brain Sci 2018 Jan;41:e150.