DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modified Urethral Graciloplasty Cross-Innervated by the Pudendal Nerve for Postprostatectomy Urinary Incontinence: Cadaveric Simulation Surgery and a Clinical Case Report

  • Hisashi Sakuma (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ichikawa General Hospital, Tokyo Dental College) ;
  • Masaki Yazawa (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine) ;
  • Makoto Hikosaka (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Center for Child Health and Development) ;
  • Yumiko Uchikawa-Tani (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital) ;
  • Masayoshi Takayama (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nasu Red Cross Hospital) ;
  • Kazuo Kishi (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2022.05.11
  • Accepted : 2022.11.30
  • Published : 2023.11.15

Abstract

An artificial sphincter implanted in the bulbous urethra to treat severe postprostatectomy urinary incontinence is effective, but embedding-associated complications can occur. We assessed the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of urethral graciloplasty cross-innervated by the pudendal nerve. A simulation surgery on three male fresh cadavers was performed. Both ends of the gracilis muscle were isolated only on its vascular pedicle with proximal end of the obturator nerve severed and transferred to the perineum. We examined whether the gracilis muscle could be wrapped around the bulbous urethra and whether the obturator nerve was long enough to suture with the pudendal nerve. In addition, surgery was performed on a 71-year-old male patient with severe urinary incontinence. The postoperative 12-month outcomes were assessed using a 24-hour pad test and urodynamic study. In all cadaveric simulations, the gracilis muscles could be wrapped around the bulbous urethra in a γ-loop configuration. The length of the obturator nerve was sufficient for neurorrhaphy with the pudendal nerve. In the clinical case, the postoperative course was uneventful. The mean maximum urethral closure pressure and functional profile length increased from 40.7 to 70 cm H2O and from 40.1 to 45.3 mm, respectively. Although urinary incontinence was not completely cured, the patient was able to maintain urinary continence at night. Urethral graciloplasty cross-innervated by the pudendal nerve is effective in raising the urethral pressure and reducing urinary incontinence.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Clinical Anatomy Laboratory at Keio University, School of Medicine for their cooperation.

References

  1. Foley FE. An artificial sphincter; a new device and operation for control of enuresis and urinary incontinence. J Urol 1947;58(04):250-259 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69552-1
  2. Van der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JNYoung Academic Urologists Functional Urology Group. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol 2013;63(04):681-689
  3. Kumar A, Litt ER, Ballert KN, Nitti VW. Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence-what do patients choose? J Urol 2009;181(03):1231-1235 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.022
  4. Deming CL. Transplantation of the gracilis muscle for incontinence of urine. JAMA 1926;86:822-825 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1926.02670380012007
  5. Pickrell K, Georgiade N, Crawford H, Maguire C, Boone A. Gracilis muscle transplant for correction of urinary incontinence in male children. Ann Surg 1956;143(06):764-779 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-195606000-00005
  6. Williams NS, Hallan RI, Koeze TH, Watkins ES. Construction of a neorectum and neoanal sphincter following previous proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1989;76(11):1191-1194
  7. Janknegt RA, Baeten CG, Weil EH, Spaans F. Electrically stimulated gracilis sphincter for treatment of bladder sphincter incontinence. Lancet 1992;340(8828):1129-1130 https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)93153-E
  8. Janknegt RA, Heesakkers JP, Weil EH, Baeten CG. Electrically stimulated gracilis sphincter (dynamic graciloplasty) for treatment of intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a pilot study on feasibility and side effects. J Urol 1995;154(05):1830-1833 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66794-6
  9. van Aalst VC, Werker PM, Stremel RW, et al. Electrically stimulated free-flap graciloplasty for urinary sphincter reconstruction: a new surgical procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102(01):84-91 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199807000-00013
  10. Hikosaka M, Yazawa M, Sakuma H, Uchikawa Y, Takayama M, Kishi K. Anatomic basis of anorectal reconstruction by dynamic graciloplasty with pudendal nerve anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2015;58(01):104-108 https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000268
  11. Uchikawa-Tani Y, Yazawa M, Sakuma H, Hikosaka M, Takayama M, Kishi K. Reconstruction of the urethral sphincter with dynamic graciloplasty in a male rabbit model. Urol Int 2016;96(02):217-222 https://doi.org/10.1159/000442474
  12. Guo H, Sa Y, Xu Y, Wang L, Fei X. Adynamic graciloplasty with a pedicled gracilis muscle flap wrapped around bulbar urethra for treatment of male acquired urinary incontinence. Urology 2016;91:208-214 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.073
  13. Bessede T, Sooriakumaran P, Takenaka A, Tewari A. Neural supply of the male urethral sphincter: comprehensive anatomical review and implications for continence recovery after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2017;35(04):549-565 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1901-8
  14. Zvara P, Carrier S, Kour NW, Tanagho EA. The detailed neuroanatomy of the human striated urethral sphincter. Br J Urol 1994;74(02):182-187 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1994.tb16583.x
  15. Desautel MG, Kapoor R, Badlani GH. Sphincteric incontinence: the primary cause of post-prostatectomy incontinence in patients with prostate cancer. Neurourol Urodyn 1997;16(03):153-160 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(1997)16:3<153::AID-NAU4>3.0.CO;2-D
  16. Ficazzola MA, Nitti VW. The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings. J Urol 1998;160(04):1317-1320 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62525-4
  17. Dubbelman YD, Bosch JL. Urethral sphincter function before and after radical prostatectomy: Systematic review of the prognostic value of various assessment techniques. Neurourol Urodyn 2013;32(07):957-963 https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22355
  18. Strasser H, Ninkovic M, Hess M, Bartsch G, Stenzl A. Anatomic and functional studies of the male and female urethral sphincter. World J Urol 2000;18(05):324-329 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003450000145
  19. Murakami G, Nakajima F, Sato TJ, Tsugane MH, Taguchi K, Tsukamoto T. Individual variations in aging of the male urethral rhabdosphincter in Japanese. Clin Anat 2002;15(04):241-252 https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10015
  20. Burnett AL, Mostwin JL. In situ anatomical study of the male urethral sphincteric complex: relevance to continence preservation following major pelvic surgery. J Urol 1998;160(04):1301-1306 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62521-7
  21. Shi GG, Wang H, Wang L, Zhang ZX, Wang H. Two different gracilis loops in graciloplasty of congenital fecal incontinence: comparison of the therapeutic effects. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015;30(10):1391-1397 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2274-y
  22. Vukovich JG, McKenna PH, Grice GP, Docimo SG. A heterotopic autoinnervated urinary neosphincter. J Urol 1995;153(06):2010-2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67392-0
  23. Martinez Portillo FJ, Osmonov DK, Seif C, et al. Restoration of external urethral sphincter function after pudendal nerve end-to-end anastomosis in the male rabbit. J Urol 2004;171(04):1715-1719 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000116124.58457.b4
  24. Foehring RC, Sypert GW, Munson JB. Motor-unit properties following cross-reinnervation of cat lateral gastrocnemius and soleus muscles with medial gastrocnemius nerve. II. Influence of muscle on motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 1987;57(04):1227-1245 https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1987.57.4.1227
  25. Thomas PE, Ranatunga KW. Factors affecting muscle fiber transformation in cross-reinnervated muscle. Muscle Nerve 1993;16(02):193-199 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880160213
  26. Frey M, Happak W, Girsch W, Bittner RE, Gruber H. Histomorphometric studies in patients with facial palsy treated by functional muscle transplantation: new aspects for the surgical concept. Ann Plast Surg 1991;26(04):370-379
  27. Sato T, Konishi F, Kanazawa K. Functional perineal colostomy with pudendal nerve anastomosis following anorectal resection: a cadaver operation study on a new procedure. Surgery 1997;121(05):569-574 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(97)90113-6
  28. Giovanoli P, Koller R, Meuli-Simmen C, et al. Functional and morphometric evaluation of end-to-side neurorrhaphy for muscle reinnervation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106(02):383-392 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200008000-00021
  29. Morley SE. Combining an end to side nerve to masseter transfer with cross face nerve graft for functional upgrade in partial facial paralysis-an observational cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021;74(07):1446-1454 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.11.015
  30. Pirro N, Konate I, Sielezneff I, Di Marino V, Sastre B. Anatomic bases of graciloplasty using end-to-side nerve pudendal anastomosis. Surg Radiol Anat 2005;27(05):409-413 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-005-0001-z
  31. Sato T, Konishi F, Kanazawa K. End-to-side pudendal nerve anastomosis for the creation of a new reinforcing anal sphincter in dogs. Surgery 2000;127(01):92-98 https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2000.103158