DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

General Anesthesia and Endoscopic Upper Gastrointestinal Tumor Resection

전신 마취와 내시경적 상부위장관 종양절제술

  • Seung Hyun Kim (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 김승현 (연세대학교 의과대학 마취통증의학교실)
  • Received : 2023.10.31
  • Accepted : 2023.11.08
  • Published : 2023.12.20

Abstract

Appropriate sedation and analgesia are crucial for successful endoscopic procedures, patient safety, and satisfaction. Endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal tumors requires a deep sedation level because the procedure is lengthy and induces moderate to severe pain. Continuous patient consciousness assessment and vigilant vital signs monitoring are required for deep sedation. General anesthesia may unintentionally occur even during deep sedation for endoscopic tumor resection, which may cause unexpected complications, especially in high-risk patients. Previous studies have revealed that general anesthesia increases the en bloc resection rate and decreases the procedure time. Complications, such as perforation, aspiration pneumonia, and cardiopulmonary instability, including hypoxemia, hypotension, and arrhythmia, occurred more frequently in patients with sedation compared to those with general anesthesia. Therefore, general anesthesia demonstrated potential benefits in endoscopic treatment results and patient safety. General anesthesia should be considered a useful alternative for sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic gastrointestinal tumor resection. However, more high-quality prospective studies are required to determine the safety and effectiveness of general anesthesia in endoscopic upper gastrointestinal tumor resection because most studies comparing general anesthesia and sedation in these procedures have been retrospectively conducted and the results were inconsistent.

Keywords

References

  1. Gotoda T, Yamamoto H, Soetikno RM. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol 2006;41:929-942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-006-1954-3
  2. Chung IK, Lee JH, Lee SH, et al. Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:1228-1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.027
  3. Kim JJ, Lee JH, Jung HY, et al. EMR for early gastric cancer in Korea: a multicenter retrospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;66:693-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.04.013
  4. Yachimski P, Hur C. Upper endoscopy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and upper gastrointestinal bleeding: results of a decision analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2009;54:701-711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-008-0403-y
  5. Woodbridge PD. Changing concepts concerning depth of anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1957;18:536-550. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-195707000-00002
  6. Smith ZL, Mullady DK, Lang GD, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating general endotracheal anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care and the incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP in high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2019;89:855-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.001
  7. Smith ZL, Das KK, Kushnir VM. Anesthesia-administered sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: monitored anesthesia care or general endotracheal anesthesia? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2019;32:531-537. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000741
  8. Chang JI, Kim TJ, Hwang NY, et al. Clinical outcomes and adverse events of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection of the mid to upper stomach under general anesthesia and monitored anesthetic care. Clin Endosc 2022;55:77-85. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.002
  9. Yurtlu DA, Aslan F, Ayvat P, et al. Propofol-based sedation versus general anesthesia for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e3680. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003680
  10. Rong QH, Zhao GL, Xie JP, Wang LX. Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal or gastric carcinomas under general anesthesia. Med Princ Pract 2013;22:280-284. https://doi.org/10.1159/000344002
  11. Song BG, Min YW, Cha RR, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection under general anesthesia for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is associated with better clinical outcomes. BMC Gastroenterol 2018;18:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0813-z
  12. Hamada K, Kawano K, Yamauchi A, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal neoplasms under general anesthesia. Clin Endosc 2019;52:252-257. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.151
  13. Kim SH, Choi YS, Lee SK, Oh H, Choi SH. Comparison of general anesthesia and conscious sedation in procedure-related complications during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 2020;34:3560-3566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07663-9
  14. Yagi Kuwata N, Gotoda T, Suzuki S, Mukai S, Itoi T, Moriyasu F. Reasonable decision of anesthesia methods in patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal carcinoma: a retrospective analysis in a single Japanese institution. Turk J Gastroenterol 2016;27:91-96. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2015.150186
  15. Park CH, Kim H, Kang YA, et al. Risk factors and prognosis of pulmonary complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasia. Dig Dis Sci 2013;58:540-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2376-0
  16. Togo M, Akazawa Y, Akashi T, et al. Comprehensive prospective analysis of the factors contributing to aspiration pneumonia following endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasms. Acta Med Okayama 2020;74:407-413. https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/60800
  17. Ng A, Smith G. Gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration of gastric contents in anesthetic practice. Anesth Analg 2001;93:494-513. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200108000-00050
  18. Sakai T, Planinsic RM, Quinlan JJ, Handley LJ, Kim TY, Hilmi IA. The incidence and outcome of perioperative pulmonary aspiration in a university hospital: a 4-year retrospective analysis. Anesth Analg 2006;103:941-947. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000237296.57941.e7