Journal of Research and Publication Ethics (연구윤리)

Korea Distribution Science Association (한국유통과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ethical Issues on Environmental Health Study

  • Hyein WOO (Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Program in Environmental Education, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2023.02.28
  • Accepted : 2023.03.31
  • Published : 2023.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Adequate public input and participation in environmental health research must be provided to ensure accurate results from studies involving human exposure to potentially hazardous substances. By addressing these ethical issues associated with environmental health research, this study can help reduce risks for individuals participating in studies and whole communities affected by their impactful findings. Research design, data and methodology: The current research should have followed the rule of qualitative textual research, searching and exploring the adequate prior resources such as books and peer-reviewed journal articles so that the current author could screen proper previous works which are acceptable for the content analysis. Results: The current research has figured out four ethical issues to improve environmental health study as follows: (1) Lack of Guidance for Collecting and Utilizing Data Ethically, (2) Insufficient Consideration Is Given to Vulnerable Populations When Conducting Studies, (3) Unclear Standards Exist for Protecting the Privacy Of Participant's Personal Information, and (4) Conducting Socially and Religiously Acceptable Research in Various Communities. Conclusions: This research concludes that future researchers should consider implementing anonymization techniques where possible so that findings are still accessible, but the risk posed by disclosing identifying information remains minimized during the analysis/publication stages.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the research grant of the KODISA Scholarship Foundation in 2023.

References

  1. Akerlof, K. L., Delamater, P. L., Boules, C. R., Upperman, C. R., & Mitchell, C. S. (2015). Vulnerable populations perceive their health as at risk from climate change. International journal of environmental research and public health, 12(12), 15419-15433. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121214994
  2. Benevolenza, M. A., & DeRigne, L. (2019). The impact of climate change and natural disasters on vulnerable populations: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 29(2), 266-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1527739
  3. Brody, J. G., Morello-Frosch, R., Brown, P., Rudel, R. A., Altman, R. G., Frye, M., ... & Seryak, L. M. (2007). Improving Disclosure and Consent: "Is It Safe?": New Ethics for Reporting Personal Exposures to Environmental Chemicals. American Journal of Public Health, 97(9), 1547-1554. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.094813
  4. Collier, Z. A., Kennedy, A. R., Poda, A. R., Cuddy, M., Moser, R. D., MacCuspie, R. I., Harmon, A. R., Plourde, K. J., Haines, C. J., & Stevens, J. A. (2015). Tiered guidance for risk-informed environmental health and safety testing of nanotechnologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 17(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2856-6
  5. Conti, I., Simioni, C., Varano, G., Brenna, C., Costanzi, E., & Neri, L. M. (2021). Legislation to limit environmental plastic and microplastic pollution and their influence on human exposure. Environmental Pollution, 288, 117708.
  6. Farashahi, M., Hafsi, T., & Molz, R. (2005). Institutionalized norms of conducting research and social realities: a research synthesis of empirical works from 1983 to 2002. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00104.x
  7. Flory, J., & Emanuel, E. (2004). Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. Jama, 292(13), 1593-1601. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.13.1593
  8. Haynes, E. N., Beidler, C., Wittberg, R., Meloncon, L., Parin, M., Kopras, E. J., ... & Dietrich, K. N. (2011). Developing a bidirectional academic-community partnership with an Appalachian-American community for environmental health research and risk communication. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119(10), 1364-1372. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1003164
  9. Israel, B. A., Parker, E. A., Rowe, Z., Salvatore, A., Minkler, M., Lopez, J., ... & Halstead, S. (2005). Community-based participatory research: lessons learned from the Centers for Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research. Environmental health perspectives, 113(10), 1463-1471. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7675
  10. Kagan, R. S. (2003). Food allergy: an overview. Environmental health perspectives, 111(2), 223-225. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.5702
  11. Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2020). The consequences of data fabrication and falsification among researchers. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 1(2), 7-10. https://doi.org/10.15722/JRPE.1.2.202009.7
  12. Karie, N. M., Sahri, N. M., Yang, W., Valli, C., & Kebande, V. R. (2021). A review of security standards and frameworks for IoTbased smart environments. IEEE Access, 9, 121975-121995. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3109886
  13. Keune, H. (2012). Critical complexity in environmental health practice: simplify and complexify. Environmental Health, 11(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-1
  14. Lavery, J. V., Upshur, R. E. G., Sharp, R. R., & Hofman, K. J. (2003). Ethical issues in international environmental health research. International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 206(4-5), 453-463. https://doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00242
  15. Moeller, D. W. (2011). Environmental health. Harvard University Press.
  16. Murthy, S., Bakar, A. A., Rahim, F. A., & Ramli, R. (2019, May). A comparative study of data anonymization techniques. In 2019 IEEE 5th Intl Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud (BigDataSecurity), IEEE Intl Conference on High Performance and Smart Computing,(HPSC) and IEEE Intl Conference on Intelligent Data and Security (IDS) (pp. 306-309). IEEE.
  17. Newing, H. (2010). Conducting research in conservation: social science methods and practice. Routledge.
  18. Ragas, A. M. J. (2011). Trends and challenges in risk assessment of environmental contaminants. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 8(3), 195-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2011.597769
  19. Rodham, K., & Gavin, J. (2006). The ethics of using the internet to collect qualitative research data. Research Ethics, 2(3), 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610600200303
  20. Sexton, K., & Adgate, J. L. (1999). Looking at environmental justice from an environmental health perspective. Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology, 9(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500021
  21. Sharp, R. R. (2003). Ethical issues in environmental health research. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111(14), 1786-1788. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6778
  22. Soskolne, C. L. (1997). Ethical, social, and legal issues surrounding studies of susceptible populations and individuals. Environmental Health Perspectives, 105(suppl 4), 837-841.
  23. Sugiura, L., Wiles, R., & Pope, C. (2017). Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics, 13(3-4), 184-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116650720
  24. Yassi, A., Kjellstrom, T., De Kok, T., & Guidotti, T. (2001). Basic environmental health. Oxford University Press, USA.