DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reliability evaluation of periodontal disease oral health information on YouTube

동영상 공유 플랫폼에서 치주질환 구강건강정보의 신뢰도 평가

  • Received : 2023.11.16
  • Accepted : 2023.11.30
  • Published : 2023.12.30

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to assess the form, reliability, and quality of information related to periodontal diseases shared on YouTube. Methods: On october 23, 2023, we conducted searches on YouTube using four keywords related to periodontal diseases. The searches retrieved a total of 394 videos from the first five pages for each keyword. Of these, 151 were included in the analysis. Videos were categorized based on the source and usefulness of the information, and their reliability and quality were assessed. Results: Analysis of the information sources revealed that medical websites or TV channels (45.7%) were the most prevalent, whereas commercial websites (2.0%) were the least prevalent. Videos uploaded by physician or hospitals (3.08±0.48) and medical websites or TV channels (3.01±0.94) demonstrated higher reliability. Videos categorized as having good and excellent quality were predominantly from physician or hospital sources (88.2%). Useful information related to periodontal diseases was available in 85.4% of videos, with physician or hospital sources contributing the highest proportion of useful information (52.7%). Conclusions: Videos from physician or hospital sources provide high-quality useful and reliable information. To ensure the provision of more useful and accurate information, the involvement and interest of experts are deemed essential.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi EM, Park SH. Association between relative handgrip strength and periodontitis: mediating effect of high sensitivity c-reactive protein. Korean Public Health Research 2023;49(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.22900/kphr.2023.49.1.001
  2. Lee JH, Hwang TY. Effects of multiple chronic diseases on periodontal disease in Korean adults. JAMCH 2018;43(4):224-33. https://doi.org/10.5393/JAMCH.2018.43.4.224
  3. Li A, Chen Y, Schuller AA, van der Sluis LWM, Tjakkes GE. Dietary inflammatory potential is associated with poor periodontal health: a population-based study. J Clin Periodontol 2021;48(7):907-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13472
  4. Cho HJ. Major oral health indicators in mature and middle age. J Korean Dent Assoc 2019;58(1):38-44. https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2019.58.1.004
  5. Gabarron E, Fernandez-Luque L, Armayones M, Lau AY. Identifying measures used for assessing quality of YouTube videos with patient Health information: a review of current literature. Interact J Med Res 2013;2:e6. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.2465
  6. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Informatics J 2015;21(3):173-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458213512220
  7. Insight Korea. Falling in love with YouTube in Korea [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 30]. Available from: https://www.insightkorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=112386.
  8. Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A. Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation: literature review. JMIR Med Educ 2018;4(1):e3. https://doi.org/10.2196/mededu.8527
  9. Kim ES. Medical YouTube videos and evaluation. Korean J Gastroenterol 2018;72(6):275-6. https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2018.72.6.275
  10. Jo CK, Lee SY, Kim MJ. Utility evaluation of information from YouTube on breastfeeding for preterm babies. J Korean Soc Neonato 2019;26(4):185-90. https://doi.org/10.5385/nm.2019.26.4.185
  11. Koo BS, Kim D, Jun JB. Reliability and quality of Korean YouTube videos for education regarding gout. J Korean Med Sci 2021;36(45):e303. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e303
  12. Onder ME, Zengin O. YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis. Rheumatol Int 2021;41(7):1321-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04813-7
  13. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53(2):105-11. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.2.105
  14. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis-a wakeup call?. J Rheumatol 2012;39(5):899-903. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.111114
  15. Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet FK. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjogren's syndrome?. Oral Dis 2016;22(3):196-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12404
  16. Azer SA, AlOlayan TI, AlGhamdi MA, AlSanea MA. Inflamma-tory bowel disease: an evaluation of health information on the internet. World J Gastroenterol 2017;23(9):1676-96. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1676
  17. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018;43(22):E1334-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691
  18. Hur KY, Ha ES, Kim DH, Song WJ, Mun JH. Quality evaluation of Korean YouTube videos as a source of information on malignant melanoma. Korean J Dermatol 2022;60(3):143-50.
  19. Lee JY, Lee HJ, Cha DH, Lee JH, Lee HJ. Qualitative evaluation of YouTube videos on conservative treatment after ankle sprain and analysis of Correlation with preference. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2022;57(4):326-32. https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2022.57.4.326