Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society (한국학교수학회논문집)

The Korean School Mathematics Society (한국학교수학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the performance verbs in achievement standard of 2022 revised elementary mathematics curriculum based on revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives

Bloom의 신교육목표분류학에 기반한 2022 개정 초등수학 교육과정의 성취기준에 포함된 수행동사의 분석

  • Received : 2023.11.14
  • Accepted : 2023.12.04
  • Published : 2023.12.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study classified performance verbs that appeared in the achievement standards of the 2022 revised elementary mathematics curriculum based on Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. The results of this study are as follows. First, the total number of achievement standards is 121. And the number of performance verbs included in these achievement standards was 171. Second, the number of performance verbs for each grade group was in the order of understand and speak in the 1st and 2nd grade groups. And in the 3rd to 4th grade group, the order is understand, explain and calculate. In the 5th and 6th grade group, the number of performance verbs was in the order of understand and know. Third, in all grade groups, the number of topics was in the order of understand, application, and memory. It was found that understanding was more concentrated than the others.

Bloom의 신교육목표분류체계에 기반해서 2022 개정 초등수학 교육과정의 성취기준에 포함된 수행동사를 분류하고, 이를 분석한 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 2022 개정 초등수학 교육과정에서 성취기준의 총 개수는 121개이고, 이 성취기준들에 포함된 수행동사의 개수는 171개이었다. 둘째, 각 학년군별로 수행동사의 개수는 1~2학년군에서 '이해한다', '말할 수 있다'의 순이었다. 그리고 3~4학년군에서는 '이해한다', '설명할 수 있다', '계산을 할 수 있다'의 순으로, 5~6학년군에서 수행동사의 개수는 '이해한다', '알 수 있다' 등의 순으로 나타났다. 셋째, 모든 학년군에서 인지과정 차원의 유목별 분포는 '이해하다', '적용하다', '기억하다 등의 순이었는데, '이해하다' 는 다른 유목들에 비해서 집중되어 있는 것으로 나타났다. 위와 같은 결과로부터 교육과정의 개발 시에 성취기준에 포함된 수행동사를 보다 구체적으로 구현할 필요가 있으며, 이는 수학교육 연구에서 교육과정 분야의 중요한 연구 주제임을 시사점으로 제시한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics curriculum (# 2015-74 supplement 8). Ministry of Education.
  2. Ministry of Education (2022a). Mathematics curriculum (# 2022-33 supplement 8). Ministry of Education.
  3. Kwon, J., Jung, H., & Jung, S. (2023). International comparison of performance verbs included in achievement standards of mathematics curriculum: Focusing on South Korea, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Communications of Mathematical Education, 37(2), 105-134. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2023.37.2.105
  4. Kim, H., & Shin, H. (2020). Analysis for characteristics of changes in achievement standards according to curriculum of mathematics in elementary school. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 24(4), 323-342.
  5. Park, G., & Park, H. (2023). A study on 2015 national curriculum of middle school history. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 26(1), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2023.26.1.57
  6. Park, K., Lee, H., Park, S., Kang, E., Kim, S. H., Yim, H., Kim, S. Y., Jang, H., Kang, T., Kwon, J., Kim, M., Bang, J., Lee, H., Yim, M., Lee, M., Kim, H., Yoon, S., Kee, K., Lee, K., Jo, H., Kwon, Y., Kwon, O., Shin, D., Kang, H., Kim, J., DO, J., Park, J., Seo, B., An, H., Oh, T., Lee, K., Lee, K., Lee, M., Lee, S., Lee, E., Lee, J., Jeon, I., Choi, J., Han, J., Hwang, S., Park, M., Kim, W., & Kang, S. (2015). A study on developing 2015 revised mathematics curriculum II. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity research report BD15120005.
  7. Park, K. S. (2013). An analysis of modes in the learning-content achievement standards of Korean 2011 elementary mathematics curriculum: Focused on 'Understand,' 'Know,' and 'Meaning'. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 23(4), 517-531.
  8. Shin, J., & Cho, C. (2008). The statement of geography instruction objectives and the creation of evaluation questions based on revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Journal of Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(2), 129-144.
  9. Ahn, J., Jeon, Y., Youn, M., & Lee, J. (2014). A comparative analysis of the 2009 revised curriculum for mathematics in Korea and the common core state standard for mathematics(CCSSM) in the U.S. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 17(4), 437-464.
  10. Lee, K., Kim, S., Kim, N., Lee, M., Cho, S., Jee, Y., Choi, Y., Na, K., Do, J, Sun, W., Lee, J., Lim, M., Choi, J., Tak, B., Rim, H., Kim, B., Kim, B., Na, M., Suh, B., Lee, Y, Jung, J., Kang, H., Ko, H., Jang, J., Kang, H., Ku, N., Gwon, S., Kim, D., Kim, Y., Kim, H., Kim, J., Kim, H., Park, J., Yang, J., Lee, K., Lee, S., Jun, S., Jun, J., Jung, J., Jo, J., Ju, M., Ju, Y., Choi, K., Choi, Y., & Hong, Y. (2022). Study of development on 2015 revised mathematics curriculum. Korea Foundation for Advancement of Science & Creativity research report 11-B552111-000034-01.
  11. Lee, M., & Lee, J. (2023). Analysis of the 2022 revised elementary mathematics curriculum based on Bloom's revised taxonomy of educational objectives. Study of Mathematics and Science, 46, 1-19.
  12. Lee, H. Y. (2017). Study and international comparison on the meaning of 'core ideas' in mathematics curriculum. School Mathematics, 19(3). 495-511.
  13. Lee, H. Y. (2020). Exploring improvement of curriculum on analysis of the connectivity between competencies, skills and achievement standards in 2015 revised mathematics curriculum for elementary school. The Mathematical Education, 59(4), 357-371. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2020.59.4.357
  14. Cho, W., & Kim, S. (2020). Analysis of achievement standards of 2015 revised high school mathematics curriculum based on Bloom's revised taxonomy of educational objectives. Journal of Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(1), 381-402.
  15. Choi, J., Choi, K., & Park, K. (2014). A critical review of handling the concave polygons in elementary 4th grade mathematics textbooks accordingto 2009 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 17(4), 613-627.
  16. Hwang, H., Kim, D., Lee, D., Song, M., Shin, H., Jang, H., Kim, S., Ko, H., Kim, S., Lee, H., Bang, S., Park, H., Lee, J., Kim, Y., Do, J., Kim, H., Jeon, C., & Choi, H. (2011). A study on the mathematics curriculum according to the 2009 revised curriculum. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity policy report 2011-11.
  17. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2005). 교육과정 수업평가를 위한 새로운 분류학-Bloom 교육목표분류학의 개정(강현석, 강이철, 권대훈, 박영무, 이원희, 조영남, 주동범, 최호성 공역). 서울: 아카데미프레스 (원저 2001년 출판).
  18. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2