한국학교수학회논문집 (Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society)

  • 제26권4호
  • /
  • Pages.285-306
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1229-0890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-4350(eISSN)
한국학교수학회 (The Korean School Mathematics Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

현장 적용성을 고려한 수학불안 관련 수학학습 상담 및 코칭 모델(R-UTF) 개발

Development of a math-learning counseling and coaching model (R-UTF) related to math anxiety, considering field applicability

  • 투고 : 2023.10.04
  • 심사 : 2023.11.20
  • 발행 : 2023.12.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 2022 교육과정에서 강조한 수학학습 맞춤형 교육(교육부, 2022b, p. 11)의 대안으로 수학클리닉에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있다. 이를 위한 현장에 실현가능한 프로그램을 개발하고자 정의적 영역 중 수학불안 감소를 위해 첫째, 교원연수 프로그램에 참여한 교사들을 대상으로 수학불안 감소 처치프로그램을 자신들의 학생들에게 사용하고 그 후기를 발표한 초, 중등교사들의 반응을 분석하여서 수정 본을 구성하였고, 둘째, 앞서 교사들의 반응에 따라 보완된 모델을 학생들에게 적용한 결과물을 산출함으로써 수학불안 처치를 위한 수학학습 상담 및 코칭 모델을 최종으로 모색하였다. 본 연구는 현장 적용을 위한 모델개발에서 기초적으로 시도하는 과정으로써 전문가 자문 집단에 의한 전문가 협의회를 통해 전 과정을 점검하였다. 특히 수정과 개발의 반복이 가능한 설계실험에 따라 교사연수에 참여한 교사들의 반응에 의해 수정한 모델을 다시 학생들에게 적용한 결과물을 산출하였기로 현장 적용성이 크게 높아질 것으로 기대한다. 연구결과로는 상담에서 코칭으로 나아가는 수학학습과정에서 복합적 처치를 위한 진단과 투여가 용이하므로 학습유형별 맞춤형 교육이 실현되는 장점이 부각되었다.

Recently, the 2022 curriculum included a section on math learning clinics for the personalized education, so in order to develop a program that is feasible in the field, first, responses of elementary and middle school teachers in a teacher training program using a treatment program to reduce math anxiety among the affective areas, was analyzed and a revised model was constructed, and secondly, a math learning counseling and coaching model for treating math anxiety was finally sought by revising the results of applying the revised model to students according to the results from the first phase. This study was a basic attempt at developing a model for field application, and the entire process was inspected using a professional council by an expert advisory group. In particular, it is expected that field applicability will be greatly increased as the results of applying the revised model to students based on the responses of teachers who participated in the teacher training were produced. As a result of the study, the advantage of literally realizing personalized education was highlighted as it is easy to diagnose and administer complex treatments in the mathematics learning process that progresses from counseling to coaching.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 2022년 단국대학교 교내연구비로 지원되었습니다. 자료 수집에 도움을 주신 수원외국어고등학교 한세호 박사에게 심심한 감사를 드립니다.

참고문헌

  1. Choi-Koh, S., & Lee, C. (2016). A brain-based study with two groups of high math anxiety and low math anxiety through the non-psychological remedy program of functional tasks. The Mathematical Education, 55(3), 383-396. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2016.55.3.383
  2. Ministry of Education (2022a). The first comprehensive plan for basic academic skills guarantee(2023~2027). Ministry of Education.
  3. Ministry of Education (2022b). The general guideline of the national curriculum for elementary and secondary education (# 2022-33 supplement 8). Ministry of Education.
  4. Kim, K., Lee, Y., & Wang, E. (2002). A meta-analysis on the efficacy of group counseling conducted in Korea. The Korean Journal of Counseling, 3(1), 47-62.
  5. Kim, D. (2011). The coaching method of reading for underachievers. Journal of CheongRam Korean Language Education, 43, 187-224. https://doi.org/10.26589/jockle..43.201106.187
  6. Kim, R. (2021). Analysis of changes in mathematical anxiety of elementary school students: A longitudinal study. Communications of Mathematical Education, 35(1), 1-14.
  7. Kim, J., & Ko, H. (2022). CARE model-based math learning coaching model development study. Communications of Mathematical Education, 36(4), 511-533.
  8. Kim, J., Ko, H., Huh, N., & Hwang, H. (2017). A study of the assessment model for math clinic program. Communications of Mathematical Education, 31(3), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2017.31.3.313
  9. Kim, H., & Choi-Koh, S. (2019). Development and application of K-UTF program for mathematical anxiety reduction. Journal of Education & Culture, 25(5), 789-812.
  10. Kim, H., & Ko, H. (2018). A case study on math clinical counseling based on connection with class. Communications of Mathematical Education, 32(2), 113-129.
  11. Park, J., Ku, J., Park, S., Park, J., Park, H., Baek, J., Ryu, S., Lee, G., Lee, S., & Joo, H. (2022). Analysis of changes in cognitive and affective characteristics by achievement level of secondary education from 2019 to 2021. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, Research Report ORM 2022-68-23.
  12. Park, H., & Cho, W. (2017). A Case analysis on the treatment of mathematics anxiety utilizing a program to change students' thought of mathematics. Communications of Mathematical Education, 31(1), 17-48. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2017.31.1.17
  13. Suh, W. (2009). A study on the comparison between christian coaching and counseling, and on the effect of integrative application. Korean Journal of Christian Counseling, 18, 33-60.
  14. Shin, E., & Lee, I. (2010). Effectgs of the learning coaching program for the elementary underachievers. Asian Journal of Education, 11(4), 145-165.
  15. Lew, K. (2017). The effect of mathematics anxiety of upper-grades elementary school students' mathematic achievement according to the grades and gender. Journal of the Korea Institute of Youth Facility and Environment, 15(2), 111-119.
  16. Yoo, J. (2009). On the separativeintergrative approaches of counseling and coaching. Korean Journal of Christian Counseling, 18, 95-120.
  17. Lee, S., Han, S., & Yi, S. (2007). Mathematics anxiety by mathematical learning style and the grade in school: Elementary school students. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 28(6), 1-16.
  18. Lee, J. (2008). Application plan of coaching method for instruction consulting. The Journal of Elementary Education, 21(2), 307-332.
  19. Jung, J., & Kim, S. (2008). A study on the factors of mathematics anxiety of mathematical underachievers in the elementary school. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 11(2), 315-335.
  20. Cho, J., & Tak, J. (2018). The effect of the learning coaching program based on growth mindset for the high school underachievers. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 25(11), 325-347. https://doi.org/10.21509/KJYS.2018.11.25.11.325
  21. Choe, S., Park, S., & Hwang, H. (2014). Analysis of the current situation of affective characteristics of Korean students based on the results of PISA and TIMSS. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 17(1), 23-43.
  22. Choi, Y., Park, S., & Son, E. (2016). Experiences of pre-service teacher's self-directed learning coaching. The Korean Journal of the Human Development, 23(3), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.15284/kjhd.2016.23.3.243
  23. Ha, J., & Kim, P. (2017). The effects of brain-based learning coaching for underachievers: Focusing on cognitive processing styles. Korean Journal of Thinking Development, 13(1), 49-67.
  24. Han, S., & Choi-Koh, S. (2016). The changes of mathematics anxiety shown brain-based measurement through a remedy program for high school students. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 26(2), 205-224.
  25. Boaler, J. (2017). 스탠퍼드 수학공부법: 스스로 답을 찾는 힘(송명진, 박용하 역). 와이즈베리 (원저 2015년 출판).
  26. Bonds, C. W., Bonds, L. G., & Peach, W. (1992). Metacognition: Developing independence in learning. The Clearing House, 66(1), 56-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.1992.9955930
  27. Choi-Koh, S., & Ryoo, B. (2019). Differences of math anxiety groups based on two measurements, MASS and EEG. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 39(5), 659-677.
  28. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiment in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
  29. Collins, G. (2004). Christian counseling: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). Thomas Nelson Publishers.
  30. Hamlin, R. G., Ellinger, A. D., & Beattie, R. S. (2008). The emergent 'coaching industry': A wake-up call for HRD professionals. Human Resource Development International, 11(3), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860802102534
  31. Hamman, D., Berthelot, J., Saia, J., & Crowley, E. (2000). Teachers' coaching of learning and its relation to students' strategic learning. Journal of Educational psychology, 92(2), 342-348. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.342
  32. OECD (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world-first results from PISA 2003. OECD.
  33. Ko, H., & Yi, H. (2011). Development and validation of mathematics anxiety scale for students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(6), 509-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9150-4
  34. Levinson, H. (1996). Executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48(2), 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.48.2.115
  35. Margaret, W. (2014). 왜 나는 늘 불안한걸까(김좌준 역). 소울메이트 (원저 2008년 출판).
  36. Tobias, S. (1995). Overcoming math anxiety (Revised and Expended). W.W.Norton & Co.
  37. Turnbull, J. (2014). 교사를 위한 학습코칭(이영만 역). 학지사 (원저 2009년 출판).
  38. Whitmore, J. (2004). Something really has to change:'change management'as an imperative rather than a topic. Journal of Change Management, 4(1), 5-14.